Agriculture Victoria, 475 Mickleham Road, Attwood, Victoria 3049, Australia.
Agriculture Victoria, 475 Mickleham Road, Attwood, Victoria 3049, Australia.
Sci Total Environ. 2021 Jun 20;774:144795. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.144795. Epub 2021 Jan 26.
Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) are synthetic, organic chemicals that resist environmental breakdown. The properties that made PFAS into an industrial success also led to their persistence and bioaccumulation. As PFAS were widely used for many decades their presence is evident globally, and their persistence and potential for toxicity create concern for human, animal and environmental health. Following the precautionary principle, a reduction in human exposure is generally recommended. The most significant source of human exposure to PFAS is dietary intake (food and water) with additional exposure via dust. As PFAS concentrations have been more frequently studied in aquatic food sources, there is less understanding of exposure via terrestrial animals. To further define human exposure via animal products, it is necessary to determine PFAS concentrations and persistence in terrestrial livestock and game species. Studies assessing ambient concentrations of PFAS have noted that, aside from point sources of contamination, there is generally low input of PFAS into terrestrial agricultural food chains. However, livestock and game species may be exposed to PFAS via contaminated water, soil, substrate, air or food, and the contribution of these exposures to PFAS concentrations in food products is less well studied. This review focuses on perfluoroalkyl substances (PFAAs) and compiles information from terrestrial livestock and game species as a source of dietary exposure in humans, and discusses toxicokinetics and health effects in animals, while identifying future focus areas. Publications describing the transfer of PFAAs to farmed and hunted animals are scarce, and demonstrate large variability in distribution and elimination. We outline several relatively small, short-term studies in cattle, sheep, pigs and poultry. While negative effects have not been noted, the poultry investigations were the only studies to explicitly assess health effects. Comparative information is presented on PFAA concentrations in livestock products and edible tissues of game animals.
全氟和多氟烷基物质(PFAS)是合成的有机化学品,能抵抗环境分解。使 PFAS 成为工业成功的特性也导致了它们的持久性和生物累积性。由于 PFAS 被广泛使用了几十年,它们的存在在全球范围内是显而易见的,它们的持久性和潜在毒性对人类、动物和环境健康构成了关注。根据预防原则,一般建议减少人类接触。人类接触 PFAS 的最主要来源是饮食摄入(食物和水),通过灰尘还会有额外的接触。由于 PFAS 浓度在水生食物来源中被更频繁地研究,因此对通过陆地动物暴露的了解较少。为了进一步确定通过动物产品的人类暴露情况,有必要确定陆地牲畜和狩猎物种中 PFAS 的浓度和持久性。评估 PFAS 环境浓度的研究指出,除了污染的点源外,PFAS 一般很少进入陆地农业食物链。然而,牲畜和狩猎物种可能会通过受污染的水、土壤、基质、空气或食物接触到 PFAS,这些暴露对食品中 PFAS 浓度的贡献研究得还不够充分。本综述重点介绍全氟烷基物质(PFAAs),并从陆地牲畜和狩猎物种中收集信息,作为人类饮食暴露的来源,同时讨论了动物的毒代动力学和健康影响,并确定了未来的重点领域。描述 PFAAs 转移到养殖和狩猎动物的出版物很少,并且表明分布和消除的变异性很大。我们概述了几项关于牛、绵羊、猪和家禽的相对较小、短期的研究。虽然没有注意到负面影响,但家禽调查是唯一明确评估健康影响的研究。还介绍了关于牲畜产品和狩猎动物可食用组织中 PFAA 浓度的比较信息。