University of South Australia, Clinical and Health Sciences, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia; Environment Protection Authority Victoria, Centre for Applied Sciences, Macleod, Victoria, Australia.
Environment Protection Authority Victoria, Centre for Applied Sciences, Macleod, Victoria, Australia; Arcadis L18, Queen & Collins Tower, 376-390 Collins Street, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Environ Res. 2023 May 15;225:115518. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2023.115518. Epub 2023 Feb 24.
The migration of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) onto agricultural properties has resulted in the accumulation of PFAS in livestock. The environmental determinants of PFAS accumulation in livestock from the grazing environment are poorly understood, resulting in limited capacity to manage livestock exposure and subsequent transfer of PFAS through the food chain. Analytical- (n = 978 samples of soil, water, pasture, and serum matrices), farm management/practice- and livestock physiology data were collated and interrogated from environmental PFAS investigations across ten farms, from four agro-ecological regions of Victoria (Australia). Statistical analysis identified perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS) and perfluorohexane sulfonate (PFHxS) as key analytes of concern for livestock bioaccumulation. PFOS and PFHxS concentrations in livestock drinking water were positively correlated with serum concentrations while other intake pathways (pasture and soil) had weaker correlations. Seasonal trends in PFAS body burden (serum concentrations) were identified and suggested to be linked to seasonal grazing behaviours and physiological water requirements. The data showed for the first time that livestock exposure to PFAS is dynamic and with relatively short elimination half-lives, there is opportunity for exposure management. Meat from cattle, grazed on PFAS impacted sites, may exceed health-based guideline values for PFAS, especially for markets with low limits (like the European Commission Maximum Limits or EC MLs). This study found that sites with mean livestock drinking water concentrations as low as 0.003 μg PFOS/L may exceed the EC ML for PFOS in cattle meat. Risk assessment can be used to prioritise site cleanup and development of management plans to reduce PFAS body burden by considering timing of stock rotation and/or supplementation of primary exposure sources.
PFAS 向农业用地的迁移导致了 PFAS 在牲畜中的积累。从放牧环境来看,牲畜中 PFAS 积累的环境决定因素尚未得到充分理解,这导致管理牲畜暴露和随后通过食物链转移 PFAS 的能力有限。本研究从澳大利亚维多利亚州四个农业生态区的 10 个农场的环境 PFAS 调查中收集和查询了分析(n=978 个土壤、水、牧草和血清基质样本)、农场管理/实践和牲畜生理学数据。统计分析确定全氟辛烷磺酸(PFOS)和全氟己烷磺酸(PFHxS)是牲畜生物累积的关键关注分析物。牲畜饮用水中 PFOS 和 PFHxS 浓度与血清浓度呈正相关,而其他摄入途径(牧草和土壤)相关性较弱。确定了 PFAS 体内负荷(血清浓度)的季节性趋势,并认为这与季节性放牧行为和生理需水有关。该数据首次表明,牲畜接触 PFAS 是动态的,由于相对较短的消除半衰期,有机会进行暴露管理。在受 PFAS 影响的地点放牧的牛的肉可能超过 PFAS 的基于健康的指导值,特别是对于限制较低的市场(如欧盟委员会最大限量或 EC MLs)。本研究发现,牲畜饮用水中平均浓度低至 0.003μg PFOS/L 的地点可能超过牛肉中 PFOS 的 EC ML。风险评估可用于通过考虑牲畜轮换的时间和/或补充主要暴露源来优先进行场地清理和管理计划的制定,以减少 PFAS 体内负荷。