Suppr超能文献

短篇交流:经训练和未经训练的观察者解读的 3 种农场培养系统检测乳腺炎病原体的比较性能。

Short communication: Comparative performance of 3 on-farm culture systems for detection of mastitis pathogens interpreted by trained and untrained observers.

机构信息

Department of Population Medicine and Diagnostic Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853.

Department of Population Medicine and Diagnostic Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853.

出版信息

J Dairy Sci. 2021 Apr;104(4):4936-4941. doi: 10.3168/jds.2020-19166. Epub 2021 Feb 19.

Abstract

On-farm culture (OFC) systems facilitate pathogen-based mastitis management and can facilitate antimicrobial stewardship on dairy farms. Interpretation of the results, however, may present a challenge for those with limited microbiology experience. Here, we compared results of 3 OFC systems interpreted by trained and untrained observers against results of a standard laboratory reference method (aerobic culture and mass spectrometry). Milk samples (280 quarter and 60 composite) were selected from submissions for routine diagnostic testing to Quality Milk Production Services (Cornell University, Ithaca, NY) between August 2017 and January 2018. Samples were cultured simultaneously using the standard laboratory reference method and 3 commercially available OFC systems that varied in detail of pathogen identification (provided in parentheses) as follows: (1) Minnesota Easy Culture System II Bi-plate (University of Minnesota Laboratory for Udder Health, St. Paul; gram-positive, gram-negative), (2) Minnesota Easy Culture System II Tri-plate (gram-positive, gram-negative, some genus level), and (3) FERA Diagnostics and Biologicals AccuMast plate (Ithaca, NY; genus level, some species level). After 18 to 24 h of incubation, OFC plates were interpreted by 1 trained observer (>10 yr of experience in milk microbiology) and 6 untrained observers with no previous milk microbiology training, using only the manufacturers' instructions for guidance. Strength of agreement (κ) between observer groups and the reference method was determined for the available outcomes of each system. Interpreted by the trained observer, agreement was moderate for identifying gram-positive organisms (Bi-plate, κ = 0.56) and substantial for Streptococcus spp. (Tri-plate, κ = 0.64, AccuMast κ = 0.61). Interpretation by untrained observers resulted in fair agreement (κ = 0.29-0.37) for these organisms. Moderate agreement (κ = 0.43-0.59) was found across all 3 OFC for the identification of gram-negative organisms (Bi-plate), non-aureus staphylococci (Tri-plate and AccuMast), Lactococcus spp., and Enterococcus spp. (AccuMast) when interpreted by the trained observer, and fair to moderate agreement was found (κ = 0.31-0.53) among untrained observers. Across all 3 OFC, agreement was almost perfect (κ = 0.80-0.89) for Staphylococcus aureus for the trained observer, and moderate to substantial (κ = 0.56-0.61) for untrained observers. We concluded that all 3 OFC appeared suitable to support pathogen-based mastitis management when operated by trained observers. Training beyond the instruction manual is a prerequisite to make OFC systems useful for pathogen-based mastitis management.

摘要

在农场文化(OFC)系统中,有利于基于病原体的乳腺炎管理,并能促进奶牛场的抗菌药物管理。然而,对于那些微生物学经验有限的人来说,解释结果可能会带来挑战。在这里,我们比较了经过培训和未经培训的观察者对三种 OFC 系统的解释结果,与标准实验室参考方法(有氧培养和质谱法)的结果进行了比较。2017 年 8 月至 2018 年 1 月期间,从 Quality Milk Production Services(康奈尔大学,伊萨卡,NY)提交的常规诊断检测中选择了 280 个 quarters 和 60 个 composite 的牛奶样本。使用标准实验室参考方法和三种商业上可获得的 OFC 系统同时培养样本,这些系统在病原体鉴定的细节上有所不同(括号中提供),如下所示:(1)明尼苏达州简易培养系统 II 双板(明尼苏达州立大学乳房健康实验室,圣保罗;革兰氏阳性菌,革兰氏阴性菌),(2)明尼苏达州简易培养系统 II 三板(革兰氏阳性菌,革兰氏阴性菌,一些属级),和(3)FERA 诊断和生物公司 AccuMast 板(纽约伊萨卡;属级,一些种级)。孵育 18 至 24 小时后,由 1 名受过培训的观察者(超过 10 年牛奶微生物学经验)和 6 名未经培训的观察者(无牛奶微生物学培训经验)根据制造商的说明进行解释。对于每个系统的可用结果,确定了观察者组和参考方法之间的一致性(κ)。经过培训的观察者解释时,鉴定革兰氏阳性菌的一致性为中度(Bi-plate,κ=0.56),鉴定链球菌属的一致性为显著(Tri-plate,κ=0.64,AccuMast κ=0.61)。未经培训的观察者对这些生物体的解释结果为适度一致性(κ=0.29-0.37)。经过培训的观察者发现,所有 3 种 OFC 系统对革兰氏阴性菌(Bi-plate)、非金黄色葡萄球菌(Tri-plate 和 AccuMast)、乳球菌属和肠球菌属(AccuMast)的鉴定均具有中度一致性(κ=0.43-0.59),未经培训的观察者发现一致性为适度至中度(κ=0.31-0.53)。在所有 3 种 OFC 系统中,对于经过训练的观察者,金黄色葡萄球菌的一致性几乎为完美(κ=0.80-0.89),对于未经训练的观察者,一致性为中度至显著(κ=0.56-0.61)。我们得出的结论是,当由经过培训的观察者操作时,所有 3 种 OFC 系统似乎都适合支持基于病原体的乳腺炎管理。培训超出了手册的要求,是使 OFC 系统对基于病原体的乳腺炎管理有用的前提条件。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验