• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

循环加载对角度螺钉通道系统反向扭矩值的影响。

Effect of cyclic loading on reverse torque values of angled screw channel systems.

机构信息

Graduate student, Advanced Prosthodontics Residency Program, Division of Restorative and Prosthetic Dentistry, The Ohio State University College of Dentistry, Columbus, Ohio.

Emeritus Professor, Division of Restorative and Prosthetic Dentistry, The Ohio State University College of Dentistry, Columbus, Ohio.

出版信息

J Prosthet Dent. 2022 Sep;128(3):458-466. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2020.12.020. Epub 2021 Feb 19.

DOI:10.1016/j.prosdent.2020.12.020
PMID:33612334
Abstract

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM

The angled screw channel concept has become popular. However, research is lacking as to how reverse torque values of nonaxially tightened implant crowns compare with axially tightened cement-retained crowns restored on angle-correcting abutments when subjected to long-term cyclic loading.

PURPOSE

The purpose of this in vitro study was to evaluate the ability of different 25-degree angled screw channel hexalobular systems to apply the target torque value on their screws, the effect of cyclic loading on their reverse torque values, and their survival compared with crowns cemented on conventional 0-degree screw channel abutments.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A total of 28 implants were divided into 4 groups. Twenty-one angled screw channel crowns were fabricated at a 25-degree angle correction by using angled titanium (Ti) bases by 3 manufacturers DY (Dynamic Tibase), DE (AngleBase), and ASC (Angulated Screw Channel) (n=7). The fourth group, UB (Universal Base, Control), had cement-retained crowns with 25-degree custom-milled, angled zirconia abutments that were cemented onto their respective Ti bases (n=7). All implants were embedded in epoxy resin blocks and tightened to manufacturer recommended values: 35 Ncm for ASC, UB, and DE and 25 Ncm for DY. Initial torque values (ITV1) were recorded. After 24 hours, the reverse torque values (24hr-RTV1) were recorded. A new set of screws was then used for each group, and the initial torque values (ITV2) were recorded. Specimens were loaded at 2 Hz for 5 million cycles under a 200-N load, and reverse torque values (RTV2) were recorded. ANOVA (α=.05) was used to compare differences in the means of deviation of initial torque values and means of reverse torque values followed by a Tukey-Kramer post hoc analysis (α=.05). Preload efficiency was calculated for each system (RTV2/ITV2), and a survival analysis was performed by using the Lifetest procedure.

RESULTS

A significant difference in the means of deviation of initial torque values of the groups with 25-degree torque application (DY, DE, and ASC) was found when compared with UB at 0 degrees. ASC and DE had lower initial torque values than UB (P<.001 and P=.003 for ASC ITV1 and ITV2, P<.001 and P=.006 for DE ITV1 and ITV2). A significant difference was found in mean reverse torque values both for after 24 hours and after cyclic loading among all groups (P<.001). A significant difference was found between mean reverse torque values before and after cyclic loading for each group (P<.001). Preload efficiency was 43.8% for DY, 46.8% for DE, 54.2% for ASC, and 48.5% for UB. No significant difference was found in the time-to-failure survival among groups (P>.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The hexalobular system of DY delivered comparable initial torque values to its target value at 25 degrees, similar to how UB (control group) delivered at 0 degrees. ASC and DE scored lower initial torque values than their target value compared with UB. The DY abutment, which had a lower manufacturer recommended torque value, had lower reverse torque values compared with those of other groups. Time-to-failure survival of all groups was similar. Fractures at the zirconia to titanium base connection were seen with ASC crowns.

摘要

问题陈述

倾斜螺丝通道概念已经流行起来。然而,关于在长期循环加载下,非轴向拧紧的种植体冠与轴向拧紧的、用粘结剂固位的在角度校正基台上的修复体的反向扭矩值如何比较,研究还很缺乏。

目的

本体外研究的目的是评估不同的 25 度倾斜螺丝通道六方系统在其螺丝上施加目标扭矩值的能力、循环加载对其反向扭矩值的影响,以及与传统 0 度螺丝通道基台粘结的冠的存活率。

材料和方法

总共 28 个种植体被分为 4 组。通过 3 个制造商 DY(Dynamic Tibase)、DE(AngleBase)和 ASC(Angulated Screw Channel)制作了 21 个 25 度角度校正的倾斜螺丝通道冠,角度为 25 度(n=7)。第四组,UB(Universal Base,对照),有 25 度定制研磨的、带角度的氧化锆基台的粘结剂固位冠,用粘结剂固位在各自的 Ti 基台上(n=7)。所有种植体都嵌入环氧树脂块中,并拧紧到制造商建议的扭矩值:ASC、UB 和 DE 的扭矩值为 35 Ncm,DY 的扭矩值为 25 Ncm。记录初始扭矩值(ITV1)。24 小时后,记录反向扭矩值(24hr-RTV1)。然后为每个组使用新的一组螺丝,并记录初始扭矩值(ITV2)。在 200-N 负载下以 2 Hz 的频率加载 500 万次循环,记录反向扭矩值(RTV2)。使用方差分析(α=.05)比较初始扭矩值偏差均值和反向扭矩值均值的差异,然后进行 Tukey-Kramer 事后分析(α=.05)。为每个系统计算预载效率(RTV2/ITV2),并使用 Lifetest 程序进行生存分析。

结果

与 0 度的 UB 相比,具有 25 度扭矩应用的组(DY、DE 和 ASC)的初始扭矩值偏差均值有显著差异。ASC 和 DE 的初始扭矩值低于 UB(ASC ITV1 和 ITV2 的 P<.001 和 P=.003,DE ITV1 和 ITV2 的 P<.001 和 P=.006)。所有组的 24 小时后和循环加载后的平均反向扭矩值均有显著差异(P<.001)。每个组的平均反向扭矩值在循环加载前后均有显著差异(P<.001)。DY 的预载效率为 43.8%,DE 的预载效率为 46.8%,ASC 的预载效率为 54.2%,UB 的预载效率为 48.5%。各组的失效时间存活率无显著差异(P>.05)。

结论

DY 的六方系统在 25 度时提供了与目标值相当的初始扭矩值,与 UB(对照组)在 0 度时提供的初始扭矩值相似。与 UB 相比,ASC 和 DE 的初始扭矩值低于其目标值。制造商推荐扭矩值较低的 DY 基台的反向扭矩值低于其他组。所有组的失效时间存活率相似。ASC 冠出现了氧化锆与钛基台连接处的断裂。

相似文献

1
Effect of cyclic loading on reverse torque values of angled screw channel systems.循环加载对角度螺钉通道系统反向扭矩值的影响。
J Prosthet Dent. 2022 Sep;128(3):458-466. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2020.12.020. Epub 2021 Feb 19.
2
Effects of cyclic loading on loss of abutment screw torque of angled screw channel single implant crowns on narrow diameter implants.循环加载对窄直径种植体上带角度螺丝通道的单颗种植体牙冠基台螺丝扭矩丧失的影响
J Prosthet Dent. 2023 Nov;130(5):741.e1-741.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2023.08.004. Epub 2023 Sep 9.
3
Abutment screw torque changes with straight and angled screw-access channels.基台螺丝扭矩会随直型和斜型螺丝通道而改变。
J Prosthet Dent. 2021 Apr;125(4):675-681. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2020.01.018. Epub 2020 May 18.
4
Effect of crown height on the screw joint stability of zirconia screw-retained crowns.牙冠高度对氧化锆螺丝固位冠螺钉连接稳定性的影响。
J Prosthet Dent. 2022 Dec;128(6):1328-1334. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2021.02.027. Epub 2021 Apr 8.
5
Removal torque and force to failure of non-axially tightened implant abutment screws.非轴向紧固种植体基台螺钉的去除扭矩和断裂力。
J Prosthet Dent. 2019 Feb;121(2):322-326. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2018.02.014. Epub 2018 Aug 20.
6
Screw stability of CAD-CAM titanium and zirconia abutments on different implants: An in vitro study.CAD-CAM 钛和氧化锆基台在不同种植体上的螺钉稳定性:一项体外研究。
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2021 Jun;23(3):373-379. doi: 10.1111/cid.13001. Epub 2021 May 2.
7
Effect of internal connection type and screw channel angle on the screw stability of anterior implant-supported zirconia crowns.内部连接类型和螺丝通道角度对前牙种植体支持氧化锆冠螺钉稳定性的影响。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2023 Nov;34(11):1248-1256. doi: 10.1111/clr.14165. Epub 2023 Aug 14.
8
Mechanical integrity of cement- and screw-retained zirconium-lithium silicate glass-ceramic crowns to Morse taper implants.水泥和螺钉固位氧化锆锂硅玻璃陶瓷冠的机械完整性与莫氏锥度种植体的结合。
J Prosthet Dent. 2018 Nov;120(5):721-731. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2018.01.028. Epub 2018 Aug 7.
9
Displacement and performance of abutments in narrow-diameter implants with different internal connections.不同内连接的细径种植体基台的位移和性能。
J Prosthet Dent. 2022 Jan;127(1):100-106. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2020.11.008. Epub 2021 Jan 4.
10
Influence of three types of abutments on preload values before and after cyclic loading with structural analysis by scanning electron microscopy.扫描电子显微镜结构分析对循环加载前后三种基台的预紧力值的影响。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2013 May-Jun;28(3):e161-70. doi: 10.11607/jomi.2481.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of Aesthetic, Mechanical Outcome, and Bone Loss in Angulated Screw Channels (ASCs) and Cement-Retained Implant-Supported Prosthesis: A Case-Control Study.成角螺钉通道(ASC)与骨水泥固位种植体支持式修复体的美学、力学结果及骨吸收比较:一项病例对照研究
Dent J (Basel). 2024 Jul 24;12(8):233. doi: 10.3390/dj12080233.
2
The mechanical complications and behavior of angulated dental implant abutment systems versus conventional abutments, a narrative review.角度式牙种植体基台系统与传统基台的机械并发症及性能:一篇叙述性综述
Saudi Dent J. 2024 Aug;36(8):1072-1077. doi: 10.1016/j.sdentj.2024.06.002. Epub 2024 Jun 4.
3
Influence of screw channel angulation on reverse torque value and fracture resistance in monolithic zirconia restorations after thermomechanical cycling: an in-vitro study.
热机械循环后单块氧化锆修复体中螺旋通道角度对逆向扭矩值和抗折强度的影响:一项体外研究。
BMC Oral Health. 2024 Mar 26;24(1):389. doi: 10.1186/s12903-024-04171-3.
4
Implant abutment using hand drivers versus torque wrench.使用手动螺丝刀与扭矩扳手植入基台。
Bioinformation. 2023 Feb 28;19(2):221-225. doi: 10.6026/97320630019221. eCollection 2023.
5
Retention of zirconia crowns to titanium bases with straight versus angled screw access channels: an invitro study.直型与斜型螺丝通道对氧化锆全瓷冠固位钛基底的影响:一项体外研究。
BMC Oral Health. 2023 Jul 7;23(1):458. doi: 10.1186/s12903-023-03177-7.
6
Reverse Torque Value of Angulated Screw Channel Abutment before and after Cyclic Loading: An In Vitro Study.角度螺丝通道基台在循环加载前后的反向扭矩值:一项体外研究
J Funct Biomater. 2023 Feb 24;14(3):124. doi: 10.3390/jfb14030124.
7
Clinical and Laboratory Outcomes of Angled Screw Channel Implant Prostheses: A Systematic Review.角形螺钉通道种植体修复体的临床和实验室结果:一项系统评价
Eur J Dent. 2022 Jul;16(3):488-499. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1740298. Epub 2022 Feb 21.
8
The Application of Angulated Screw-Channels in Metal-Free, Implant-Supported Restorations: A Retrospective Survival Analysis.成角螺丝通道在无金属、种植体支持修复中的应用:一项回顾性生存分析
Materials (Basel). 2021 Nov 19;14(22):7006. doi: 10.3390/ma14227006.