Department of Reconstructive Dentistry and Gerodontology, School of Dental Medicine, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Necmettin Erbakan University, Konya, Turkey.
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2023 Nov;34(11):1248-1256. doi: 10.1111/clr.14165. Epub 2023 Aug 14.
To investigate the effect of implant-abutment connection and screw channel angle on screw stability by comparing a newly introduced and an established connection, before and after cyclic loading.
Implants (N = 44) with Torcfit (TF) or Crossfit (CF) connection were divided to be restored with a straight (CFS and TFS) or an angled screw access channel (CFA and TFA) titanium-base abutment (n = 11). CFA and TFA received screw-retained crowns, whereas CFS and TFS received hybrid zirconia abutments and cement-retained crowns. The initial torque value (ITV) of each complex (ITV ) and removal torque value (RTV) after 24 h (RTV ) were measured. Screws were replaced with new ones, ITVs were recorded again (ITV ), and crowns were cyclically loaded (2.4 million cycles, 98 N) to measure RTVs again (RTV ). Percentage torque loss was calculated. Data were analyzed (α = 0.05).
ITVs were similar among groups (p ≥ .089). CF led to higher RTVs (p ≤ .002), while CFS had higher RTV than CFA (p = .023). After 24 h, CFS had lower percentage torque loss than TF, while CFA had lower percentage torque loss than TFA (p ≤ .011). After cyclic loading, CF led to lower percentage torque (p < .001).
The implant-abutment connection affected the removal torque values. However, no screw loosening occurred during cyclic loading, which indicated a stable connection for all groups. Screw access channel angle did not affect screw stability after cyclic loading.
通过比较新引入的和已建立的连接,在循环加载前后,研究种植体-基台连接和螺丝通道角度对螺丝稳定性的影响。
Torcfit(TF)或 Crossfit(CF)连接的种植体(N=44)分为用直螺丝通道(CFS 和 TFS)或斜螺丝通道(CFA 和 TFA)钛基基台修复(n=11)。CFA 和 TFA 接受螺丝固位冠,而 CFS 和 TFS 接受混合氧化锆基台和水泥固位冠。测量每个复合的初始扭矩值(ITV)和 24 小时后的去除扭矩值(RTV)(RTV)。更换新螺丝,再次记录 ITVs,然后对皇冠进行循环加载(240 万次,98 N),再次测量 RTVs(RTV)。计算扭矩损失百分比。数据分析(α=0.05)。
各组间 ITV 相似(p≥.089)。CF 导致较高的 RTV(p≤.002),而 CFS 的 RTV 高于 CFA(p=0.023)。24 小时后,CFS 的扭矩损失百分比低于 TF,而 CFA 的扭矩损失百分比低于 TFA(p≤.011)。循环加载后,CF 导致较低的扭矩损失百分比(p<0.001)。
种植体-基台连接影响去除扭矩值。然而,在循环加载期间没有发生螺丝松动,这表明所有组的连接都稳定。螺丝通道角度在循环加载后不影响螺丝稳定性。