Suppr超能文献

改善英国肉牛和绵羊农场新生仔畜存活率的兽医干预措施:一项定性研究。

Veterinary Interventions to Improve Neonatal Survival on British Beef and Sheep Farms: A Qualitative Study.

作者信息

Adam Katherine E, Bruce Ann, Corbishley Alexander

机构信息

Innogen Institute, Science Technology and Innovation Studies, School of Social and Political Science, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.

Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Sciences and the Roslin Institute, University of Edinburgh, Midlothian, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Front Vet Sci. 2021 Feb 4;8:619889. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2021.619889. eCollection 2021.

Abstract

Neonatal lamb and calf deaths are a major issue in UK agriculture. Consistent mortality rates over several decades, despite scientific advances, indicate that socioeconomic factors must also be understood and addressed for effective veterinary service delivery to improve lamb and calf survival. This qualitative study utilised semi-structured interviews with vets and farmers to explore the on-farm mechanisms and social context, with a particular focus on the role of the vet, to manage and reduce neonatal losses in beef calves and lambs on British farms. Data were analysed using a realist evaluation framework to assess how the mechanisms and context for veterinary service delivery influence survival as the outcome of interest. A lack of a clear outcome definition of neonatal mortality, and the financial, social and emotional impact of losses on both vets and farmers, are barriers to recording of losses and standardisation of acceptable mortality levels at a population level. Despite this, there appears to be an individual threshold on each farm at which losses become perceived as problematic, and veterinary involvement shifts from preventive to reactive mechanisms for service delivery. The veterinarian-farmer relationship is central to efforts to maximise survival, but the social and economic capital available to farmers influences the quality of this relationship. Health inequalities are well-recognised as an issue in human healthcare and the findings indicate that similar inequalities exist in livestock health systems.

摘要

新生羔羊和犊牛死亡是英国农业中的一个主要问题。尽管科学取得了进步,但几十年来死亡率一直居高不下,这表明为了有效提供兽医服务以提高羔羊和犊牛的存活率,还必须了解和解决社会经济因素。这项定性研究通过对兽医和农民进行半结构化访谈,探讨农场层面的机制和社会背景,特别关注兽医的作用,以管理和减少英国农场肉牛犊和羔羊的新生期损失。使用现实主义评估框架对数据进行分析,以评估兽医服务提供的机制和背景如何影响作为关注结果的存活率。缺乏对新生期死亡率的明确结果定义,以及损失对兽医和农民造成的经济、社会和情感影响,是在种群层面记录损失和确定可接受死亡率标准的障碍。尽管如此,每个农场似乎都有一个个体阈值,当损失被视为问题时,兽医的参与就会从预防性机制转向反应性机制。兽医与农民的关系对于实现最大存活率的努力至关重要,但农民可获得的社会和经济资本会影响这种关系的质量。健康不平等在人类医疗保健中是一个公认的问题,研究结果表明,畜牧健康系统中也存在类似的不平等现象。

相似文献

1
Veterinary Interventions to Improve Neonatal Survival on British Beef and Sheep Farms: A Qualitative Study.
Front Vet Sci. 2021 Feb 4;8:619889. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2021.619889. eCollection 2021.
3
Broken biosecurity? Veterinarians' framing of biosecurity on dairy farms in England.
Prev Vet Med. 2016 Sep 15;132:20-31. doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2016.06.001. Epub 2016 Jun 4.
4
Motivations and Barriers for Veterinarians When Facilitating Fertility Management on UK Dairy Farms.
Front Vet Sci. 2021 Sep 29;8:709336. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2021.709336. eCollection 2021.
6
Veterinary herd health management-Experience among farmers and farm managers in Swedish dairy production.
Prev Vet Med. 2018 Jul 1;155:45-52. doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2018.04.012. Epub 2018 Apr 23.
7
Combining sentiment analysis and text mining with content analysis of farm vet interviews on mental wellbeing in livestock practice.
PLoS One. 2024 May 22;19(5):e0304090. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0304090. eCollection 2024.
8
Farmer views on calving difficulty consequences on dairy and beef farms.
Animal. 2017 Feb;11(2):318-326. doi: 10.1017/S1751731116001567. Epub 2016 Jul 27.
9
Trust, feasibility, and priorities influence Swedish dairy farmers' adherence and nonadherence to veterinary advice.
J Dairy Sci. 2019 Nov;102(11):10360-10368. doi: 10.3168/jds.2019-16470. Epub 2019 Sep 5.
10
Factors influencing veterinary surgeons' decision-making about dairy cattle vaccination.
Vet Rec. 2016 Oct 22;179(16):410. doi: 10.1136/vr.103822. Epub 2016 Sep 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Improving triplet lamb survival: management practices used by commercial farmers.
Front Vet Sci. 2024 Jul 30;11:1394484. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2024.1394484. eCollection 2024.
2
Access to veterinary care: evaluating working definitions, barriers, and implications for animal welfare.
Front Vet Sci. 2024 Jan 18;11:1335410. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2024.1335410. eCollection 2024.

本文引用的文献

1
Farmers' Perceptions of Preventing Antibiotic Resistance on Sheep and Beef Farms: Risk, Responsibility, and Action.
Front Vet Sci. 2020 Aug 13;7:524. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2020.00524. eCollection 2020.
4
Antimicrobial use practices, attitudes and responsibilities in UK farm animal veterinary surgeons.
Prev Vet Med. 2018 Dec 1;161:115-126. doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2018.10.021. Epub 2018 Oct 30.
5
'': retaining vets in UK farm animal practice-thematic analysis of free-text survey responses.
Vet Rec. 2019 Jan 26;184(4):121. doi: 10.1136/vr.105066. Epub 2018 Nov 19.
6
Saturation in qualitative research: exploring its conceptualization and operationalization.
Qual Quant. 2018;52(4):1893-1907. doi: 10.1007/s11135-017-0574-8. Epub 2017 Sep 14.
10
Reducing Antimicrobial Usage in Pig Production without Jeopardizing Production Parameters.
Zoonoses Public Health. 2017 Feb;64(1):63-74. doi: 10.1111/zph.12283. Epub 2016 Jun 30.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验