Suppr超能文献

爱尔兰农民对实施农场紧急屠宰以管理急性受伤牛只的看法。

Farmers Views on the Implementation of On-Farm Emergency Slaughter for the Management of Acutely Injured Cattle in Ireland.

作者信息

McDermott Paul, McKevitt Aideen, Santos Flavia H, Hanlon Alison J

机构信息

Department of Environment, Climate Change and Agriculture, Mayo County Council, Castlebar, F23 WF90 Castlebar, Co. Mayo, Ireland.

School of Veterinary Medicine, University College Dublin, D04 W6F6 Belfield, Dublin, Ireland.

出版信息

Animals (Basel). 2023 Jan 28;13(3):450. doi: 10.3390/ani13030450.

Abstract

Four management options for acutely injured cattle in Ireland exist: treatment, unless cattle are severely injured; on-farm emergency slaughter (OFES); casualty slaughter (CS) if the animal is certified fit for transport; or euthanasia. OFES is designed to prevent transport of welfare-compromised cattle. An online survey of farmers in Ireland was carried out between April and July 2021 and focused on events during 2020. A theoretical framework of capacity, willingness, and opportunity was used to explore farmers' perceptions. Responses from 94 farmers (49 dairy and 45 beef) were analysed; not all respondents answered all questions. Respondents indicated that the incidence of acutely injured cattle in Ireland is low. A majority reported not having an acutely injured animal for greater than 36 months. Most respondents had a positive attitude towards OFES for animal welfare reasons and were aware of relevant regulations and guidelines. Barriers to OFES included a lack of availability of OFES, and dairy farmers indicated that it had a similar financial impact as euthanasia. A parallel study with veterinarians indicated a higher incidence of acutely injured cattle in Ireland; the current results may be due to the demographic or the sensitivity of the topic. Nationwide electronic data capture on the cause of mortality could support improvements in the management of acutely injured cattle and enable surveillance of the proportion of these cattle undergoing OFES, euthanasia, or CS.

摘要

爱尔兰针对急性受伤牛有四种管理方案

除非牛伤势严重,否则进行治疗;农场紧急屠宰(OFES);若动物经认证适合运输,则进行伤亡屠宰(CS);或者实施安乐死。OFES旨在防止福利受损的牛被运输。2021年4月至7月对爱尔兰农民进行了一项在线调查,重点关注2020年期间的事件。采用能力、意愿和机会的理论框架来探究农民的看法。对94位农民(49位奶农和45位肉牛养殖户)的回复进行了分析;并非所有受访者都回答了所有问题。受访者表示,爱尔兰急性受伤牛的发生率较低。大多数人报告称,超过36个月没有出现过急性受伤的牛。大多数受访者出于动物福利原因对OFES持积极态度,并且了解相关法规和指南。OFES的障碍包括OFES服务难以获得,奶农表示其对财务的影响与安乐死类似。一项与兽医开展的平行研究表明,爱尔兰急性受伤牛的发生率更高;目前的结果可能是由于人口统计学因素或该主题的敏感性。对死亡原因进行全国范围的电子数据采集,有助于改进急性受伤牛的管理,并能监测这些牛接受OFES、安乐死或CS的比例。

相似文献

7
Occurrence and reasons for on-farm emergency slaughter of cattle in Norway.挪威农场内牛紧急屠宰的发生情况及原因
Front Vet Sci. 2022 Dec 1;9:1067489. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2022.1067489. eCollection 2022.

本文引用的文献

1
Occurrence and reasons for on-farm emergency slaughter of cattle in Norway.挪威农场内牛紧急屠宰的发生情况及原因
Front Vet Sci. 2022 Dec 1;9:1067489. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2022.1067489. eCollection 2022.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验