Suppr超能文献

在线医疗记录不使用:2019 年健康信息国家趋势调查数据分析研究。

Online Medical Record Nonuse Among Patients: Data Analysis Study of the 2019 Health Information National Trends Survey.

机构信息

School of Systems and Enterprises, Stevens Institute of Technology, Hoboken, NJ, United States.

出版信息

J Med Internet Res. 2021 Feb 22;23(2):e24767. doi: 10.2196/24767.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Online medical records are being used to organize processes in clinical and outpatient settings and to forge doctor-patient communication techniques that build mutual understanding and trust.

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to understand the reasons why patients tend to avoid using online medical records and to compare the perceptions that patients have of online medical records based on demographics and cancer diagnosis.

METHODS

We used data from the Health Information National Trends Survey Cycle 3, a nationally representative survey, and assessed outcomes using descriptive statistics and chi-square tests. The patients (N=4328) included in the analysis had experienced an outpatient visit within the previous 12 months and had answered the online behavior question regarding their use of online medical records.

RESULTS

Patients who were nonusers of online medical records consisted of 58.36% of the sample (2526/4328). The highest nonuser rates were for patients who were Hispanic (460/683, 67.35%), patients who were non-Hispanic Black (434/653, 66.46%), and patients who were older than 65 years (968/1520, 63.6%). Patients older than 65 years were less likely to use online medical records (odds ratio [OR] 1.51, 95% CI 1.24-1.84, P<.001). Patients who were White were more likely to use online medical records than patients who were Black (OR 1.71, 95% CI 1.43-2.05, P<.001) or Hispanic (OR 1.65, 95% CI 1.37-1.98, P<.001). Patients who were diagnosed with cancer were more likely to use online medical records compared to patients with no cancer (OR 1.31, 95% CI 1.11-1.55, 95% CI 1.11-1.55, P=.001). Among nonusers, older patients (≥65 years old) preferred speaking directly to their health care providers (OR 1.76, 95% CI 1.35-2.31, P<.001), were more concerned about privacy issues caused by online medical records (OR 1.79, 95% CI 1.22-2.66, P<.001), and felt uncomfortable using the online medical record systems (OR 10.55, 95% CI 6.06-19.89, P<.001) compared to those aged 18-34 years. Patients who were Black or Hispanic were more concerned about privacy issues (OR 1.42, 1.09-1.84, P=.007).

CONCLUSIONS

Studies should consider social factors such as gender, race/ethnicity, and age when monitoring trends in eHealth use to ensure that eHealth use does not induce greater health status and health care disparities between people with different backgrounds and demographic characteristics.

摘要

背景

在线病历正被用于组织临床和门诊环境中的流程,并形成有助于建立医患相互理解和信任的沟通技巧。

目的

我们旨在了解患者回避使用在线病历的原因,并基于人口统计学和癌症诊断来比较患者对在线病历的看法。

方法

我们使用了全国代表性调查健康信息国家趋势调查周期 3 的数据,并使用描述性统计和卡方检验评估结果。分析中包含了在过去 12 个月内有门诊就诊经历且回答了在线行为问题(即使用在线病历情况)的患者(N=4328)。

结果

不使用在线病历的患者占样本的 58.36%(2526/4328)。在线病历使用率最高的是西班牙裔患者(460/683,67.35%)、非西班牙裔黑种人患者(434/653,66.46%)和年龄大于 65 岁的患者(968/1520,63.6%)。年龄大于 65 岁的患者不太可能使用在线病历(比值比 [OR] 1.51,95%置信区间 [CI] 1.24-1.84,P<.001)。白人患者比黑人患者(OR 1.71,95% CI 1.43-2.05,P<.001)或西班牙裔患者(OR 1.65,95% CI 1.37-1.98,P<.001)更有可能使用在线病历。与无癌症患者相比,被诊断患有癌症的患者更有可能使用在线病历(OR 1.31,95% CI 1.11-1.55,P=.001)。在非使用者中,年龄较大的患者(≥65 岁)更倾向于直接与医疗服务提供者交谈(OR 1.76,95% CI 1.35-2.31,P<.001),更担心在线病历引起的隐私问题(OR 1.79,95% CI 1.22-2.66,P<.001),并且使用在线病历系统感到不适(OR 10.55,95% CI 6.06-19.89,P<.001),与 18-34 岁的患者相比。黑种人和西班牙裔患者更担心隐私问题(OR 1.42,1.09-1.84,P=.007)。

结论

在监测电子健康使用趋势时,研究应考虑社会因素,如性别、种族/民族和年龄,以确保电子健康的使用不会在不同背景和人口统计学特征的人群之间造成更大的健康状况和医疗保健差距。

相似文献

3
Online communication between doctors and patients in Europe: status and perspectives.
J Med Internet Res. 2010 Jun 15;12(2):e20. doi: 10.2196/jmir.1281.
4
Who Isn't Using Patient Portals And Why? Evidence And Implications From A National Sample Of US Adults.
Health Aff (Millwood). 2018 Dec;37(12):1948-1954. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2018.05117.
5
eHealth patient-provider communication in the United States: interest, inequalities, and predictors.
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2017 Apr 1;24(e1):e18-e27. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocw087.
8
Online access to doctors' notes: patient concerns about privacy.
J Med Internet Res. 2013 Sep 26;15(9):e208. doi: 10.2196/jmir.2670.
9
Security and Privacy of Online Record Access: A Survey of Adolescents' Views and Experiences in Sweden.
J Adolesc Health. 2024 Nov;75(5):730-736. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2023.12.027. Epub 2024 Feb 12.
10
Frequency and Types of Patient-Reported Errors in Electronic Health Record Ambulatory Care Notes.
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Jun 1;3(6):e205867. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.5867.

引用本文的文献

1
Frequent use of online medical records: analysis of influence factors based on structural equation modeling.
Front Public Health. 2025 Aug 20;13:1609503. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1609503. eCollection 2025.
5
Disparities and Determinants of Online Medical Record Access among Cancer Survivors.
Healthcare (Basel). 2024 Aug 8;12(16):1569. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12161569.
6
Disparities in Patient Portal Use Among Adults With Chronic Conditions.
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Feb 5;7(2):e240680. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.0680.
7
Factors Associated with Online Patient Portal Utilization Experience in an Arkansas Phone Survey.
Telemed J E Health. 2024 Apr;30(4):e1148-e1156. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2023.0490. Epub 2023 Nov 27.
8
Identifying contributors to disparities in patient access of online medical records: examining the role of clinician encouragement.
JAMIA Open. 2023 Jul 7;6(3):ooad049. doi: 10.1093/jamiaopen/ooad049. eCollection 2023 Oct.
10
Disparities in patient portal access by US adults before and during the COVID-19 pandemic.
JAMIA Open. 2022 Dec 16;5(4):ooac104. doi: 10.1093/jamiaopen/ooac104. eCollection 2022 Dec.

本文引用的文献

3
Telehealth transformation: COVID-19 and the rise of virtual care.
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2020 Jun 1;27(6):957-962. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocaa067.
4
Utilizing Digital Health Technologies for Patient Education in Lifestyle Medicine.
Am J Lifestyle Med. 2019 Dec 13;14(2):137-142. doi: 10.1177/1559827619892547. eCollection 2020 Mar-Apr.
7
A systematic review of care management interventions targeting multimorbidity and high care utilization.
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Jan 30;18(1):65. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-2881-8.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验