Suppr超能文献

解析女性尿道狭窄之谜:管理方式的系统评价和荟萃分析。

Deciphering the enigma of female urethral strictures: A systematic review and meta-analysis of management modalities.

机构信息

Department of Urology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh, India.

Department of Community and Family Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh, India.

出版信息

Neurourol Urodyn. 2021 Jan;40(1):65-79. doi: 10.1002/nau.24584. Epub 2020 Dec 8.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the management methods of female urethral stricture (FUS) and analyze the outcomes of surgical treatments. A meta-analysis was done in an attempt to identify the best approach of urethroplasty and the graft-of-choice.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A systematic search of Pubmed/Medline and Embase databases was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items For Systematic Review And Meta-Analysis statement, for articles reporting on FUS management in the last decade. The Newcastle-Ottawa scale was used to assess the quality of 28 included non-randomized studies. The data on FUS management was summarized and pooled success rates (taken as symptom improvement and no need for further instrumentation) were compared. The secondary outcome was to establish a diagnostic modality of choice and define a "successful-outcome" of repair.

RESULTS

The outcome was separately reported for 554 women undergoing surgical intervention for FUS in the literature. The criteria defining FUS were varied. A combination of tests was used for diagnosis as none was singularly conclusive. A total of 301 patients had previous urethral instrumentations. The pooled success rate of urethral dilatation (234 women) was 49% at a mean follow-up of 32 months; flap urethroplasty (108 cases) was 92% at a mean follow-up of 42 months; buccal mucosal graft (BMG) urethroplasty (133 cases) was 89% at a mean follow-up of 19 months; vaginal graft augmentation (44 cases) was 87% at a mean follow-up of 15 months; and labial graft reconstruction (19 cases) was 89% at a mean follow-up of 18.4 months. The dorsal approach of graft augmentation met with 88% (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.79-0.95) success compared with 95% (95% CI 0.86-1) for the ventral approach.

CONCLUSION

FUS is a rare condition requiring a meticulous diagnostic workup using multiple tests. All urethroplasties have shown better pooled success rates (86%-93%) compared with dilatation (49%). BMG is equally effective as vaginal graft urethroplasty.

摘要

目的

评估女性尿道狭窄(FUS)的处理方法,并分析手术治疗的结果。通过荟萃分析试图确定尿道成形术的最佳方法和首选移植物。

材料和方法

根据系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目,对过去十年中报告 FUS 处理的 Pubmed/Medline 和 Embase 数据库进行了系统搜索。使用纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表评估 28 项非随机研究的质量。总结 FUS 处理数据并汇总成功率(视为症状改善且无需进一步器械治疗),比较结果。次要结果是建立首选诊断方法并定义修复的“成功结果”。

结果

文献中分别报道了 554 名接受手术治疗 FUS 的女性的结果。定义 FUS 的标准各不相同。由于没有单一的诊断方法具有结论性,因此联合使用了多种测试进行诊断。共有 301 名患者之前接受过尿道器械治疗。尿道扩张(234 例女性)的总体成功率为 49%,平均随访 32 个月;皮瓣尿道成形术(108 例)的成功率为 92%,平均随访 42 个月;颊黏膜移植物(BMG)尿道成形术(133 例)的成功率为 89%,平均随访 19 个月;阴道移植物增强术(44 例)的成功率为 87%,平均随访 15 个月;阴唇移植物重建术(19 例)的成功率为 89%,平均随访 18.4 个月。与 95%(95%置信区间 0.86-1)相比,移植物增强的背侧入路成功率为 88%(95%置信区间 0.79-0.95)。

结论

FUS 是一种罕见的疾病,需要使用多种测试进行细致的诊断。所有尿道成形术的总体成功率(86%-93%)均优于扩张术(49%)。BMG 与阴道移植物尿道成形术同样有效。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验