Suppr超能文献

比较腹侧与背侧口腔黏膜移植尿道成形术治疗女性尿道狭窄:一项系统评价和荟萃分析

Comparing ventral and dorsal oral mucosal graft urethroplasty in female urethral stricture: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

作者信息

Ortac Mazhar, Ozervarli M Firat, Ergul Rifat Burak, Aydinoglu Arda Tunc, Bicer Mevlut Melih, Ekerhult Teresa Olsen, Tonyali Senol, Prof Assoc

机构信息

Department of Urology, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul University, Topkapı, Turgut Özal Millet Street, Fatih, 34093 , Istanbul, Turkey.

Department of Urology, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.

出版信息

World J Urol. 2025 Jun 26;43(1):397. doi: 10.1007/s00345-025-05773-4.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Reconstructive surgical options have become an alternative for female urethral stricture. Dorsal and ventral methods using oral mucosa grafts have been described, but their superiority over each other has not been evaluated. In this meta-analysis, the outcomes of dorsal and ventral techniques with oral mucosa graft in female urethroplasty have been compared.

MATERIAL AND METHOD

A systematic search of Pubmed, Scopus and Web of Science databases was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items For Systematic Review And Meta-Analysis statement. Manuscripts published until February 2025 that reported the use of dorsal or ventral surgical approaches with oral mucosa grafts in female urethroplasty included. Success, determined based on the recurrence rate, was analyzed and compared between both groups. Complications were presented in both groups to evaluate the safety of the surgical technique.

RESULTS

A total of 320 studies were identified, with 25 meeting the inclusion criteria. The meta-analysis, including four comparative cohort studies, showed no significant difference in surgical success between the dorsal (62/69 patients) and ventral (93/103 patients) techniques (OR = 0.84, 95% CI: 0.30-2.36, p = 0.74). In the pooled analysis combining both comparative and non-comparative studies, the success rates for the dorsal and ventral techniques were 92.1% (95% CI: 89.1-95.1) and 95.5% (95% CI: 92.8-98.2), respectively, with no significant heterogeneity. A total of 4 cases of stress urinary incontinence complications were reported in the ventral approach, while 2 cases were reported using the dorsal approach. The majority of the studies (21 out of 25) provided Level 4 evidence, with only two randomized controlled trials reaching Level 2.

CONCLUSION

This meta-analysis confirms that both dorsal and ventral approaches are effective for treating female urethral stricture, with high success rates. There was no statistically significant difference in success rates between the ventral and dorsal approaches. Surgical approach selection should depend on patient factors and surgeon expertise to achieve optimal outcomes.

摘要

目的

重建性手术方案已成为女性尿道狭窄的一种替代方法。已描述了使用口腔黏膜移植物的背侧和腹侧方法,但它们之间的优越性尚未得到评估。在这项荟萃分析中,比较了女性尿道成形术中使用口腔黏膜移植物的背侧和腹侧技术的结果。

材料与方法

根据系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目,对PubMed、Scopus和科学网数据库进行了系统检索。纳入截至2025年2月发表的报告在女性尿道成形术中使用背侧或腹侧手术方法并带有口腔黏膜移植物的手稿。根据复发率确定的成功率在两组之间进行分析和比较。列出两组的并发症以评估手术技术的安全性。

结果

共识别出320项研究,其中25项符合纳入标准。该荟萃分析包括四项比较队列研究,结果显示背侧(62/69例患者)和腹侧(93/103例患者)技术在手术成功率方面无显著差异(OR = 0.84,95%CI:0.30 - 2.36,p = 0.74)。在综合比较性和非比较性研究的汇总分析中,背侧和腹侧技术的成功率分别为92.1%(95%CI:89.1 - 95.1)和95.5%(95%CI:92.8 - 98.2),无显著异质性。腹侧入路共报告4例压力性尿失禁并发症,而背侧入路报告2例。大多数研究(25项中的21项)提供了4级证据,只有两项随机对照试验达到2级。

结论

这项荟萃分析证实,背侧和腹侧入路治疗女性尿道狭窄均有效,成功率高。腹侧和背侧入路的成功率在统计学上无显著差异。手术入路的选择应取决于患者因素和外科医生的专业知识,以实现最佳结果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0a07/12202565/d46179aec4ce/345_2025_5773_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验