• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估肝硬化患者疾病知识的工具:构建与效度

Instrument to evaluate the knowledge of patient with cirrhosis on his disease: construction and validity.

作者信息

Stelmach Mariana, de Almeida Medeiros Kayo Augusto, Carvalho Bárbara Justo, Pipek Leonardo Zumerkorn, de Mesquita Gustavo Heluani Antunes, Nii Fernanda, Martines Diego Ramos, Iuamoto Leandro Ryuchi, D'Albuquerque Luiz Augusto Carneiro, Meyer Alberto, Andraus Wellington

机构信息

Departamento de Gastroenterologia, Hospital das Clínicas HCFMUSP, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo, Avenida Doutor Arnaldo, 455, São Paulo, Brazil.

Faculdade de Medicina FMUSP, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.

出版信息

BMC Gastroenterol. 2021 Feb 23;21(1):83. doi: 10.1186/s12876-021-01665-0.

DOI:10.1186/s12876-021-01665-0
PMID:33622249
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7903789/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The application of measurement instruments is a strategy to evaluate the patient's knowledge about the disease. This study aims to build an instrument that evaluates the patient's knowledge about liver cirrhosis.

METHOD

This study includes three phases. The first one was the construction of the instrument based on a literature review. In the second phase, five experts were participated in the evaluation of the instrument, to check the validity of the content. Quantitative and qualitative analyzes were made. The tool used was the CVI (Content Validity Index) and it was used the semantic study of the questions. The third phase was the process of the restructuring the instrument.

RESULTS

The final version of the instrument consisted of 36 questions. The instrument was evaluated in 91.7 by the average CVI and 94.4% by the universal CVI.

CONCLUSIONS

The questions are properly structured and clear, therefore, understandable. Thus, the final instrument presented satisfactory content validity, so that, it reached the aim of this study.

摘要

背景

测量工具的应用是评估患者对疾病认知的一种策略。本研究旨在构建一种评估患者对肝硬化认知的工具。

方法

本研究包括三个阶段。第一阶段是基于文献综述构建工具。在第二阶段,五名专家参与了对该工具的评估,以检查内容的有效性。进行了定量和定性分析。使用的工具是CVI(内容效度指数),并对问题进行了语义研究。第三阶段是对工具进行重组的过程。

结果

该工具的最终版本由36个问题组成。该工具的平均CVI评分为91.7%,通用CVI评分为94.4%。

结论

问题结构合理且清晰,因此易于理解。因此,最终工具呈现出令人满意的内容效度,从而达到了本研究的目的。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e5e3/7903789/be2aa50d9d7f/12876_2021_1665_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e5e3/7903789/be2aa50d9d7f/12876_2021_1665_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e5e3/7903789/be2aa50d9d7f/12876_2021_1665_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Instrument to evaluate the knowledge of patient with cirrhosis on his disease: construction and validity.评估肝硬化患者疾病知识的工具:构建与效度
BMC Gastroenterol. 2021 Feb 23;21(1):83. doi: 10.1186/s12876-021-01665-0.
2
Development and validation of Simulation Scenario Quality Instrument (SSQI).《模拟情景质量工具(SSQI)的开发与验证》。
BMC Med Educ. 2023 Dec 19;23(1):972. doi: 10.1186/s12909-023-04935-5.
3
[Content validity in the development and adaptation processes of measurement instruments].[测量工具开发与改编过程中的内容效度]
Cien Saude Colet. 2011 Jul;16(7):3061-8. doi: 10.1590/s1413-81232011000800006.
4
The measurement of collaboration within healthcare settings: a systematic review of measurement properties of instruments.医疗机构内协作的测量:对测量工具属性的系统评价
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):138-97. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-2159.
5
Screening for masticatory disorders in older adults (SMDOA): An epidemiological tool.老年人咀嚼障碍筛查(SMDOA):一种流行病学工具。
J Prosthodont Res. 2020 Jul;64(3):243-249. doi: 10.1016/j.jpor.2019.07.011. Epub 2019 Aug 9.
6
[Psychometric characteristics of questionnaires designed to assess the knowledge, perceptions and practices of health care professionals with regards to alcoholic patients].[旨在评估医护人员对酒精依赖患者的知识、认知及实践情况的调查问卷的心理测量学特征]
Encephale. 2004 Sep-Oct;30(5):437-46. doi: 10.1016/s0013-7006(04)95458-9.
7
Head and neck cancer: validation of a data collection instrument.头颈癌:一种数据收集工具的验证
Rev Bras Enferm. 2018 Jul-Aug;71(4):1899-1906. doi: 10.1590/0034-7167-2017-0227.
8
Oral health in childhood: construction and validation of an instrument on knowledge, attitude, and practice of caregivers.儿童口腔健康: caregiver 知识、态度和实践的工具的构建和验证。
Cien Saude Colet. 2023 Aug;28(8):2203-2214. doi: 10.1590/1413-81232023288.07042023.
9
Development and Content Validity of the Self-Care of Oral Anticancer Agents Index (SCOAAI).口服抗肿瘤药物自我护理指数(SCOAAI)的制定和内容效度。
Semin Oncol Nurs. 2023 Jun;39(3):151402. doi: 10.1016/j.soncn.2023.151402. Epub 2023 Mar 16.
10
Development and validation of a new tool to measure the facilitators, barriers and preferences to exercise in people with osteoporosis.一种用于测量骨质疏松症患者运动的促进因素、障碍和偏好的新工具的开发与验证。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2017 Dec 19;18(1):540. doi: 10.1186/s12891-017-1914-5.

本文引用的文献

1
Creation and validation of a checklist for blood transfusion in children.儿童输血检查表的创建与验证
Rev Bras Enferm. 2018 Nov-Dec;71(6):3020-3026. doi: 10.1590/0034-7167-2018-0098.
2
Head and neck cancer: validation of a data collection instrument.头颈癌:一种数据收集工具的验证
Rev Bras Enferm. 2018 Jul-Aug;71(4):1899-1906. doi: 10.1590/0034-7167-2017-0227.
3
Development and psychometric testing of the Knowledge, Attitudes and Practices (KAP) questionnaire among student Tuberculosis (TB) Patients (STBP-KAPQ) in China.
中国学生结核病患者(STBP)知识、态度和实践(KAP)问卷的编制及心理测量学检验。
BMC Infect Dis. 2018 May 8;18(1):213. doi: 10.1186/s12879-018-3122-9.
4
Evaluation of methods used for estimating content validity.评价用于估计内容效度的方法。
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2019 Feb;15(2):214-221. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2018.03.066. Epub 2018 Mar 27.
5
Development and validation of a new tool to measure the facilitators, barriers and preferences to exercise in people with osteoporosis.一种用于测量骨质疏松症患者运动的促进因素、障碍和偏好的新工具的开发与验证。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2017 Dec 19;18(1):540. doi: 10.1186/s12891-017-1914-5.
6
Improving Quality of Care in Patients with Liver Cirrhosis.改善肝硬化患者的医疗质量。
Middle East J Dig Dis. 2017 Oct;9(4):189-200. doi: 10.15171/mejdd.2017.73.
7
Association of Health Literacy With Postoperative Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Major Abdominal Surgery.健康素养与接受大型腹部手术患者术后结局的关联。
JAMA Surg. 2018 Feb 1;153(2):137-142. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2017.3832.
8
Psychometric properties in instruments evaluation of reliability and validity.工具评估中的信度和效度的心理测量特性。
Epidemiol Serv Saude. 2017 Jul-Sep;26(3):649-659. doi: 10.5123/S1679-49742017000300022.
9
Liver Transplantation in Brazil.巴西的肝移植
Liver Transpl. 2016 Sep;22(9):1254-8. doi: 10.1002/lt.24487. Epub 2016 Jul 25.
10
Understanding the Complexities of Cirrhosis.了解肝硬化的复杂性。
Clin Ther. 2015 Aug;37(8):1822-36. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2015.05.507. Epub 2015 Jul 15.