Rodrigues Isabel B, Adachi Jonathan D, Beattie Karen A, MacDermid Joy C
McMaster University School of Rehabilitation Science, 1400 Main Street Wm, IAHS 308, Hamilton, ON, L8S 4K1, Canada.
Department of Kinesiology, Waterloo University, 200 University Ave W, BMH 1100A/1102, Waterloo, ON, N2L 3G1, Canada.
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2017 Dec 19;18(1):540. doi: 10.1186/s12891-017-1914-5.
Despite the widely known benefits of exercise and physical activity, adherence rates to these activities are poor. Understanding exercise facilitators, barriers, and preferences may provide an opportunity to personalize exercise prescription and improve adherence. The purpose of this study was to develop the Personalized Exercise Questionnaire (PEQ) to identify these facilitators, barriers, and preferences to exercise in people with osteoporosis.
This study comprises two phases, instrument design and judgmental evidence. A panel of 42 experts was used to validate the instrument through quantitative (content validity) and qualitative (cognitive interviewing) methods. Content Validity Index (CVI) is the most commonly used method to calculate content validity quantitatively. There are two kinds of CVI: Item-CVI (I-CVI) and Scale-level CVI (S-CVI).
Preliminary versions of this tool showed high content validity of individual items (I-CVI range: 0.50 to 1.00) and moderate to high overall content validity of the PEQ (S-CVI/UA = 0.63; S-CVI/Ave = 0.91). Through qualitative methods, items were improved until saturation was achieved. The tool consists of 6 domains and 38 questions. The 6 domains are: 1) support network; 2) access; 3) goals; 4) preferences; 5) feedback and tracking; and 6) barriers. There are 35 categorical questions and 3 open-ended items.
Using an iterative approach, the development and evaluation of the PEQ demonstrated high item-content validity for assessing the facilitators, barriers, and preferences to exercise in people with osteoporosis. Upon further validation it is expected that this measure might be used to develop more client-centered exercise programs, and potentially improve adherence.
尽管运动和体育活动的益处广为人知,但这些活动的坚持率却很低。了解运动的促进因素、障碍和偏好可能为个性化运动处方和提高坚持率提供机会。本研究的目的是开发个性化运动问卷(PEQ),以识别骨质疏松症患者运动的这些促进因素、障碍和偏好。
本研究包括两个阶段,即工具设计和判断性证据。由42名专家组成的小组通过定量(内容效度)和定性(认知访谈)方法对该工具进行验证。内容效度指数(CVI)是定量计算内容效度最常用的方法。CVI有两种:项目内容效度指数(I-CVI)和量表水平内容效度指数(S-CVI)。
该工具的初步版本显示单个项目具有较高的内容效度(I-CVI范围:0.50至1.00),PEQ的总体内容效度为中等至高(S-CVI/UA = 0.63;S-CVI/Ave = 0.91)。通过定性方法,对项目进行改进直至达到饱和。该工具由6个领域和38个问题组成。这6个领域是:1)支持网络;2)可及性;3)目标;4)偏好;5)反馈与跟踪;6)障碍。有35个分类问题和3个开放式项目。
采用迭代方法,PEQ的开发和评估表明,在评估骨质疏松症患者运动的促进因素、障碍和偏好方面,该问卷具有较高的项目内容效度。经过进一步验证,预计该测量方法可用于制定更以客户为中心的运动计划,并有可能提高坚持率。