Department of Family Medicine and Population Health, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
Centre for Population, Family and Health, Department of Sociology, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.
BMJ Open. 2021 Feb 23;11(2):e043866. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-043866.
The COVID-19 pandemic has led to an explosion of online research using rating scales. While this approach can be useful, two of the major challenges affecting the quality of this type of research include selection bias and the use of non-validated scales. Online research is prone to various forms of selection bias, including self-selection bias, non-response bias or only reaching specific subgroups. The use of rating scales requires contextually validated scales that meet psychometrical properties such as validity, reliability and-for cross-country comparisons-invariance across settings. We discuss options to prevent or tackle these challenges. Researchers, readers, editors and reviewers need to take a critical stance towards research using this type of methodology.
COVID-19 大流行导致使用评分量表的在线研究呈爆炸式增长。虽然这种方法可能很有用,但影响此类研究质量的两个主要挑战包括选择偏差和使用未经验证的量表。在线研究容易受到各种形式的选择偏差的影响,包括自我选择偏差、无反应偏差或仅针对特定亚组。使用评分量表需要使用具有心理计量学特性(如有效性、可靠性,并且在跨国比较中在设置上具有不变性)的上下文验证量表。我们讨论了预防或解决这些挑战的方案。研究人员、读者、编辑和审稿人需要对使用这种方法的研究持批评态度。