• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

感知压力量表在巴西低收入大学生中的效度

Validity of Perceived Stress Scale in Brazilian low-income college students.

作者信息

Rosa Ana Clara Arrais, Silva Lorrane Cristine Conceição da, Azevedo Jacyara Christina Carvalho, Oliveira Rhavenna Thais Silva, Ferreira Ruhena Kelber Abrão, Parra Maíra Tristão, Carvalho Heráclito Barbosa, Moraes Augusto César Ferreira de, Nascimento-Ferreira Marcus Vinícius

机构信息

Universidade Federal do Tocantins. Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ensino em Ciência e Saúde. Palmas, TO, Brasil.

Instituto de Ensino Superior do Sul do Maranhão. Imperatriz, MA, Brasil.

出版信息

Rev Saude Publica. 2025 Mar 31;59:e4. doi: 10.11606/s1518-8787.2025059005974. eCollection 2025.

DOI:10.11606/s1518-8787.2025059005974
PMID:40172472
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11967336/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

We tested the reliability and validity of the Perceived Stress Scale, an online questionnaire, among college students from low-income Brazilian regions.

METHODS

We assessed 195 college students from a region with a Gini index of 0.56 for the validity study and a subsample of 117 students for the reliability study, where we evaluated the Perceived Stress Scale with the 14 original items. We also applied the shortened version of the Brief Symptom Inventory with 18 items (BSI-18). The psychometric properties analyzed, including temporal stability, internal consistency, and structural and convergent validity, were assessed using Spearman's correlation coefficient, Cronbach's alpha coefficient, unsupervised machine learning, and confirmatory factor analysis.

RESULTS

The questionnaire showed acceptable reliability (temporal stability [rho ≥ 0.32] and internal consistency [alpha ≥ 0.79]). In construct validity, we identified two clusters, "helplessness" and "self-efficacy", as structure solutions for our sample via unsupervised machine learning. An acceptable fit for the two-factor structure of the scale was indicated by multiple indices (chi-square/degrees of freedom [χ2/df] = 119/76; Tucker-Lewis Index [TLI] = 0.916; Comparative Fit Index [CFI] = 0.930; root mean square error of approximation [RMSEA] = 0.054; standardized root mean-squared residual [SRMR] = 0.078)) on confirmatory factor analysis. Moreover, convergent validity was supported by significant correlations of the BSI-18 Global Severity Index score with perception of helplessness (rho = 0.71) and self-efficacy (rho = -0.42).

CONCLUSION

The Perceived Stress Scale, which is an online tool, is a reliable and valid self-report tool for college students.

摘要

目的

我们在来自巴西低收入地区的大学生中测试了在线问卷感知压力量表的信度和效度。

方法

我们评估了来自基尼系数为0.56地区的195名大学生用于效度研究,以及117名学生的子样本用于信度研究,在信度研究中我们用14个原始项目评估了感知压力量表。我们还应用了包含18个项目的简明症状量表简版(BSI-18)。使用斯皮尔曼相关系数、克朗巴赫α系数、无监督机器学习和验证性因子分析评估了包括时间稳定性、内部一致性以及结构和收敛效度在内的心理测量特性。

结果

该问卷显示出可接受的信度(时间稳定性[rho≥0.32]和内部一致性[alpha≥0.79])。在结构效度方面,通过无监督机器学习,我们为样本确定了两个聚类,即“无助感”和“自我效能感”作为结构解决方案。验证性因子分析的多个指标表明该量表的两因素结构具有可接受的拟合度(卡方/自由度[χ2/df]=119/76;塔克-刘易斯指数[TLI]=0.916;比较拟合指数[CFI]=0.930;近似误差均方根[RMSEA]=0.054;标准化残差均方根[SRMR]=0.078)。此外,BSI-18全球严重程度指数得分与无助感感知(rho=0.71)和自我效能感(rho=-0.42)的显著相关性支持了收敛效度。

结论

感知压力量表作为一种在线工具,是一种适用于大学生的可靠且有效的自我报告工具。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2389/11967336/14126513c851/1518-8787-rsp-59-e4-gf01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2389/11967336/14126513c851/1518-8787-rsp-59-e4-gf01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2389/11967336/14126513c851/1518-8787-rsp-59-e4-gf01.jpg

相似文献

1
Validity of Perceived Stress Scale in Brazilian low-income college students.感知压力量表在巴西低收入大学生中的效度
Rev Saude Publica. 2025 Mar 31;59:e4. doi: 10.11606/s1518-8787.2025059005974. eCollection 2025.
2
The Chinese version of the general benefit finding scale (GBFS): Psychometric properties in a sample of college students.一般效益发现量表(GBFS)中文版:大学生样本中的心理测量学特性。
PLoS One. 2024 May 7;19(5):e0300064. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0300064. eCollection 2024.
3
Short version of the Problem Areas in Diabetes scale(PAID-13) in Brazilian patients with diabetes: a structural and criterion validity study.巴西糖尿病患者糖尿病问题领域简短量表(PAID - 13):一项结构效度和效标效度研究
Sao Paulo Med J. 2025 Mar 14;143(2):e2024109. doi: 10.1590/1516-3180.2024.0109.R1.03072024. eCollection 2025.
4
Psychometric properties of the online Satisfaction with Life Scale in university students from a low-income region.低收入地区大学生在线生活满意度量表的心理测量特性
Psicol Reflex Crit. 2023 May 17;36(1):12. doi: 10.1186/s41155-023-00254-2.
5
Construct validity and reliability of Amharic version of DASS-21 scale among Ethiopian Defense University College of Health Science students.埃塞俄比亚国防大学健康科学学院学生使用阿姆哈拉语版 DASS-21 量表的建构效度和信度。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Aug 9;24(1):914. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11267-7.
6
[Maslach Burnout Inventory - Student Survey: Portugal-Brazil cross-cultural adaptation].[马氏倦怠量表-学生版:葡萄牙-巴西跨文化适应性研究]
Rev Saude Publica. 2012 Oct;46(5):816-24. doi: 10.1590/s0034-89102012000500008.
7
The future disposition Inventory-24: reliability and validity estimates in a large sample of Chinese University students.未来处置问卷-24:在一大群中国大学生样本中的信度和效度估计。
BMC Psychiatry. 2018 Sep 17;18(1):299. doi: 10.1186/s12888-018-1875-8.
8
The Chinese version of the Perceived Stress Questionnaire: development and validation amongst medical students and workers.中文版的感知压力问卷:医学生和医务人员的编制与验证。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2020 Mar 13;18(1):70. doi: 10.1186/s12955-020-01307-1.
9
Construct validity and reliability Amharic version of perceived stress scale (PSS-10) among Defense University students.防御大学学生感知压力量表(PSS-10)的阿法尔语版的建构效度和信度。
BMC Psychiatry. 2022 Nov 9;22(1):691. doi: 10.1186/s12888-022-04345-9.
10
Translation and cultural adaption of MacLeod Clark professional identity scale among Chinese therapy students.麦克劳德·克拉克职业认同量表在中国治疗专业学生中的翻译与文化调适
PLoS One. 2025 Jan 28;20(1):e0318101. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0318101. eCollection 2025.

本文引用的文献

1
24 h movement behavior and metabolic syndrome study protocol: A prospective cohort study on lifestyle and risk of developing metabolic syndrome in undergraduate students from low-income regions during a pandemic.24小时运动行为与代谢综合征研究方案:一项关于低收入地区大学生在疫情期间的生活方式及患代谢综合征风险的前瞻性队列研究。
Front Epidemiol. 2022 Sep 29;2:1010832. doi: 10.3389/fepid.2022.1010832. eCollection 2022.
2
Exploring Unsupervised Machine Learning Classification Methods for Physiological Stress Detection.探索用于生理应激检测的无监督机器学习分类方法。
Front Med Technol. 2022 Mar 11;4:782756. doi: 10.3389/fmedt.2022.782756. eCollection 2022.
3
Three Versions of the Perceived Stress Scale: Psychometric Evaluation in a Nationally Representative Sample of Chinese Adults during the COVID-19 Pandemic.
三种感知压力量表版本:在 COVID-19 大流行期间对中国成年人全国代表性样本的心理计量学评估。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Aug 5;18(16):8312. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18168312.
4
The pandemic of online research in times of COVID-19.COVID-19 时期的在线研究大流行。
BMJ Open. 2021 Feb 23;11(2):e043866. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-043866.
5
Measuring stress in Australia: validation of the perceived stress scale (PSS-14) in a national sample.澳大利亚压力测量:全国样本中感知压力量表(PSS-14)的验证。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2020 Apr 15;18(1):100. doi: 10.1186/s12955-020-01343-x.
6
Psychometric properties of the perceived stress scale in a community sample of Chinese.中文社区样本中感知压力量表的心理测量特性。
BMC Psychiatry. 2020 Mar 20;20(1):130. doi: 10.1186/s12888-020-02520-4.
7
Scale development: ten main limitations and recommendations to improve future research practices.量表开发:提高未来研究实践的十个主要局限性及建议
Psicol Reflex Crit. 2017 Jan 25;30(1):3. doi: 10.1186/s41155-016-0057-1.
8
Identifying population segments for effective intervention design and targeting using unsupervised machine learning: an end-to-end guide.使用无监督机器学习识别有效干预设计和目标定位的人群细分:端到端指南。
Gates Open Res. 2019 Oct 21;3:1503. doi: 10.12688/gatesopenres.13029.2. eCollection 2019.
9
Machine learning in medicine: a practical introduction.医学中的机器学习:实用入门
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2019 Mar 19;19(1):64. doi: 10.1186/s12874-019-0681-4.
10
German language questionnaires for assessing implementation constructs and outcomes of psychosocial and health-related interventions: a systematic review.评估心理社会和健康相关干预措施的实施结构和结果的德语语言问卷:系统评价。
Implement Sci. 2018 Dec 12;13(1):150. doi: 10.1186/s13012-018-0837-3.