Suppr超能文献

比较氯胺酮-丙泊酚与氯胺酮-右美托咪定两种静脉药物组合用于牙科治疗儿童镇静的疗效。

To Compare the Efficacy of Two Intravenous Combinations of Drugs Ketamine-Propofol vs Ketamine-Dexmedetomidine for Sedation in Children Undergoing Dental Treatment.

作者信息

Joshi Aum B, Shankaranarayan Ubaradka Raveendra, Hegde Amitha, Manju R

机构信息

Department of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry, AB Shetty Memorial Institute of Dental Sciences, Mangaluru, Karnataka, India.

Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, KS Hegde Medical Academy, Mangaluru, Karnataka, India.

出版信息

Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2020 Sep-Oct;13(5):529-535. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1826.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare the efficacy of two intravenous combinations of drugs ketamine-propofol (KP) vs ketamine-dexmedetomidine (KD) for sedation in children undergoing dental treatment.

STUDY DESIGN

Thirty patients were selected, evaluated according to the predetermined criteria and divided in equal numbers of 15 amongst 2 groups KP and KD.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Informed consent was taken, nil per oral (NPO) guidelines were followed and the study drug was administered. Dental procedure was performed. Heart rate (HR), blood pressure (BP) and oxygen saturation (SPO) were monitored continuously throughout the procedure. The modified Ramsay sedation (MRS) score was recorded along with Houpt sedation score. Recovery status was accessed by modified Aldrete's recovery scale.

STATISTICAL ANALYSIS

Student t test was used for comparing HR, BP and SPO. Chi-square test was used to compare MRS, Houpt sedation score and modified Aldrete's recovery scale amongst the two groups KP and KD.

RESULTS

The sedation achieved with both the groups was adequate. Both the drugs produce adequate hemodynamic stability.

CONCLUSION

Ketamine-dexmedetomidine has a better efficacy over the other group, ketamine-propofol.

HOW TO CITE THIS ARTICLE

Joshi AB, Shankaranarayan UR, Hegde A, To Compare the Efficacy of Two Intravenous Combinations of Drugs Ketamine-Propofol vs Ketamine-Dexmedetomidine for Sedation in Children Undergoing Dental Treatment. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2020;13(5):529-535.

摘要

目的

比较氯胺酮-丙泊酚(KP)与氯胺酮-右美托咪定(KD)两种静脉联合用药方案用于牙科治疗儿童镇静的疗效。

研究设计

选取30例患者,根据预定标准进行评估,并将其平均分为两组,即KP组和KD组,每组15例。

材料与方法

获取知情同意书,遵循禁食指南,给予研究药物。进行牙科治疗。在整个治疗过程中持续监测心率(HR)、血压(BP)和血氧饱和度(SPO)。记录改良Ramsay镇静评分(MRS)以及Houpt镇静评分。采用改良Aldrete恢复量表评估恢复情况。

统计分析

采用Student t检验比较HR、BP和SPO。采用卡方检验比较两组(KP组和KD组)的MRS、Houpt镇静评分和改良Aldrete恢复量表。

结果

两组均实现了充分的镇静效果。两种药物均产生了足够的血流动力学稳定性。

结论

氯胺酮-右美托咪定比另一组药物氯胺酮-丙泊酚具有更好的疗效。

如何引用本文

Joshi AB, Shankaranarayan UR, Hegde A, 比较氯胺酮-丙泊酚与氯胺酮-右美托咪定两种静脉联合用药方案用于牙科治疗儿童镇静的疗效。《国际临床儿科牙科学杂志》2020年;13(5):529 - 535。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ab2c/7887178/1ea39ce0b5ea/ijcpd-13-529-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验