Faculty of Medicine, Benha University, Benha, Egypt.
Anesthesia Department, Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt.
Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2024 Apr;28(4):211-227. doi: 10.1007/s11916-023-01208-0. Epub 2024 Jan 12.
The combination of ketamine with propofol and dexmedetomidine has gained popularity for sedation and general anesthesia in different populations. In our meta-nalysis, we helped the anesthesiologists to know the efficiency and the efficacy of both combinations in adult and pediatric patients.
We searched PubMed, CENTRAL, Web of Science, and Scopus from inception to August 1, 2023. Our outcome parameters for efficacy were recovery time, pain score, and physician satisfaction while for safety were the related cardiorespiratory, neurological, and gastrointestinal adverse events.
Twenty-two trials were included with a total of 1429 patients. We found a significantly longer recovery time in the ketadex group of 7.59 min (95% CI, 4.92, 10.26; I = 94%) and a significantly less pain score of - 0.72 (95% CI, - 1.10, - 0.34; I = 0%). Adults had a significantly better physician satisfaction score with the ketofol group, odds ratio of 0.29 (95% CI, 0.12, 0.71; I = 0%). Recovery agitations were higher in the ketofol group with an odds ratio of 0.48 (95% CI, 0.24, 0.98; I = 36%). Furthermore, we found a significant difference between the combinations with a higher incidence in the ketadex group with pooled odds ratio of 1.75 (95% CI, 1.06, 2.88; I = 15%). Ketadex was associated with lower pain scores, hypoxic events and airway obstruction, and emergence agitation. At the same time, ketofol had much more clinician satisfaction which might be attributed to the shorter recovery time and lower incidence of nausea and vomiting. Therefore, we suppose that ketadex is the better combination in periprocedural sedation for both adult and pediatric patients who are not at greater risk for postoperative nausea and vomiting.
氯胺酮与丙泊酚和右美托咪定联合应用于不同人群的镇静和全身麻醉越来越受欢迎。在我们的荟萃分析中,我们帮助麻醉师了解这两种组合在成人和儿科患者中的有效性和疗效。
我们检索了 PubMed、CENTRAL、Web of Science 和 Scopus,检索时间从建库至 2023 年 8 月 1 日。我们将疗效的结局参数定义为恢复时间、疼痛评分和医生满意度,而安全性的结局参数则定义为相关的心肺、神经和胃肠道不良事件。
共纳入 22 项试验,共纳入 1429 例患者。我们发现氯胺酮-右美托咪定组的恢复时间显著延长,为 7.59 分钟(95%CI,4.92 分钟至 10.26 分钟;I²=94%),疼痛评分显著降低,为-0.72(95%CI,-1.10 分钟至-0.34 分钟;I²=0%)。成人中,氯胺酮-丙泊酚组的医生满意度评分显著更高,比值比为 0.29(95%CI,0.12 分钟至 0.71 分钟;I²=0%)。氯胺酮-丙泊酚组的恢复性躁动发生率更高,比值比为 0.48(95%CI,0.24 分钟至 0.98 分钟;I²=36%)。此外,我们发现这两种组合之间存在显著差异,氯胺酮-右美托咪定组的发生率更高,合并比值比为 1.75(95%CI,1.06 分钟至 2.88 分钟;I²=15%)。氯胺酮-右美托咪定组与较低的疼痛评分、低氧事件和气道阻塞以及苏醒躁动相关。与此同时,氯胺酮-丙泊酚组的临床医生满意度更高,这可能归因于其恢复时间更短,恶心和呕吐的发生率更低。因此,我们假设在围手术期镇静中,氯胺酮-右美托咪定在不太可能发生术后恶心和呕吐的成人和儿科患者中是更好的组合。