Seattle Pacific University, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Suicide Life Threat Behav. 2021 Feb;51(1):36-46. doi: 10.1111/sltb.12665.
Suicide research is vitally important, yet-like psychology research more broadly-faces methodological challenges. In recent years, researchers have raised concerns about standard practices in psychological research, concerns that apply to suicide research and raise questions about its robustness and validity. In the present paper, we review these concerns and the corresponding solutions put forth by the "open science" community. These include using open science platforms, pre-registering studies, ensuring reproducible analyses, using high-powered studies, ensuring open access to research materials and products, and conducting replication studies. We build upon existing guides, address specific obstacles faced by suicide researchers, and offer a clear set of recommended practices for suicide researchers. In particular, we consider challenges that suicide researchers may face in seeking to adopt "open science" practices (e.g., prioritizing large samples) and suggest possible strategies that the field may use in order to ensure robust and transparent research, despite these challenges.
自杀研究至关重要,但与更广泛的心理学研究一样,它也面临着方法学的挑战。近年来,研究人员对心理学研究的标准实践提出了担忧,这些担忧同样适用于自杀研究,并对其稳健性和有效性提出了质疑。在本文中,我们回顾了这些关注以及“开放科学”社区提出的相应解决方案。这些方案包括使用开放科学平台、预先注册研究、确保可重复的分析、使用高影响力的研究、确保研究材料和产品的开放获取,以及进行复制研究。我们在现有指南的基础上,针对自杀研究人员面临的具体障碍,提出了一套明确的推荐实践方案。特别是,我们考虑了自杀研究人员在采用“开放科学”实践时可能面临的挑战(例如,优先考虑大样本),并提出了一些可能的策略,供该领域在面临这些挑战时使用,以确保研究的稳健性和透明性。