Department of Otolaryngology/Head and Neck Surgery, School of Medicine.
Division of Speech & Hearing, Department of Allied Health Sciences, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
Otol Neurotol. 2021 Jun 1;42(5):721-725. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000003070.
To compare acute speech recognition with a cochlear implant (CI) alone or electric-acoustic stimulation (EAS) device for place-based maps calculated with an organ of Corti (OC) versus a spiral ganglion (SG) frequency-to-place function.
Eleven adult CI recipients of a lateral wall electrode array.
Postoperative imaging was used to derive place-based maps calculated with an OC versus SG function.
Phoneme recognition was evaluated at initial activation with consonant-nucleus-consonant (CNC) words presented using an OC versus a SG place-based map.
For the 9 CI-alone users, there was a nonsignificant trend for better acute phoneme recognition with the SG map (mean 18 RAUs) than the OC map (mean 9 RAUs; p = 0.071, 95% CI [≤-1.2]). When including the 2 EAS users in the analysis, performance was significantly better with the SG map (mean 21 RAUs) than the OC map (mean 7 RAUs; p = 0.019, 95% CI [≤-6.2]).
Better phoneme recognition with the SG frequency-to-place function could indicate more natural tonotopic alignment of information compared with the OC place-based map.A prospective, randomized investigation is currently underway to assess longitudinal outcomes with place-based mapping in CI-alone and EAS devices using the SG frequency-to-place function.
比较基于耳蜗(OC)与螺旋神经节(SG)频率-位置函数的位置图谱的人工耳蜗(CI)或电-声刺激(EAS)设备的急性言语识别。
11 名接受侧墙电极阵列的成年 CI 接受者。
术后影像学用于得出基于 OC 与 SG 功能的位置图谱。
使用基于 OC 与 SG 位置图谱的辅音-核-辅音(CNC)词评估初始激活时的音位识别。
对于 9 名仅使用 CI 的患者,SG 图谱(平均 18 RAUs)的急性语音识别效果较 OC 图谱(平均 9 RAUs)有显著提高的趋势(p = 0.071,95%CI[-1.2])。当将 2 名 EAS 使用者纳入分析时,SG 图谱(平均 21 RAUs)的表现明显优于 OC 图谱(平均 7 RAUs;p = 0.019,95%CI[-6.2])。
与基于 OC 的图谱相比,SG 频率-位置函数的更好的音位识别可能表明信息具有更自然的音调拓扑排列。目前正在进行一项前瞻性、随机研究,以评估使用 SG 频率-位置函数的 CI 或 EAS 设备的基于位置图谱的纵向结果。