Suppr超能文献

用于优化电声刺激(EAS)的人工耳蜗频谱带宽。

Cochlear implant spectral bandwidth for optimizing electric and acoustic stimulation (EAS).

机构信息

Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Department of Hearing and Speech Sciences, Nashville, TN.

Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Department of Hearing and Speech Sciences, Nashville, TN.

出版信息

Hear Res. 2022 Dec;426:108584. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2022.108584. Epub 2022 Jul 28.

Abstract

Cochlear implantation with acoustic hearing preservation is becoming increasingly prevalent allowing cochlear implant (CI) users to combine electric and acoustic stimulation (EAS) in the implanted ears. Despite a growing EAS population, our field does not have definitive guidance regarding EAS technology optimization and the majority of previous studies investigating hearing aid (HA) and cochlear implant (CI) programming for EAS listeners have been mixed. Thus, the purpose of this exploratory study was to explore the effects of various EAS crossover frequencies-defined as the low-frequency (LF) CI cutoff-relative to the underlying spiral ganglion (SG) characteristic frequency associated with the most distal or apical electrode in the array. Speech recognition in semi-diffuse noise and subjective estimates of listening difficulty were measured for 15 adult CI recipients with acoustic hearing preservation in three listening conditions: 1) CI-alone, 2) bimodal (CI+HA), and best-aided EAS (CIHA+HA). The results showed no effect of LF CI cutoff for any of the three listening conditions such that there was no trend for increased performance or less subjective listening difficulty across LF CI cutoffs, referenced to underlying SG-place frequency. Consistent with past studies, the current results were also consistent with significant speech recognition and subject listening difficulty benefits for both bimodal (CI+HA) and best-aided EAS (CIHA+HA) as compared to CI-alone listening as well as significant additional benefits for best-aided EAS (CIHA+HA) compared to bimodal hearing (CI+HA). Future studies are necessary to investigate the efficacy of SG-place-based fittings for i) large samples of experienced EAS listeners for whom perceptual adaptation has occurred to the frequency mismatch provided by standard CI frequency allocations, and ii) EAS users at or close to CI activation as place-based approaches may ultimately yield greater outcomes, particularly for newly activated CI users for whom SG-place-based approaches may afford a steeper trajectory to performance asymptote.

摘要

保留声学听力的人工耳蜗植入术越来越普遍,使人工耳蜗植入(CI)使用者能够在植入耳中结合电刺激和声学刺激(EAS)。尽管 EAS 人群不断增加,但我们的领域对于 EAS 技术优化没有明确的指导,并且大多数先前研究调查 EAS 听众的助听器(HA)和人工耳蜗(CI)编程的研究结果都不一致。因此,本探索性研究的目的是研究各种 EAS 交叉频率的影响——定义为低频(LF)CI 截止频率——相对于与阵列中最远或最顶端电极相关的基底螺旋神经节(SG)特征频率。在三种听力条件下,对 15 名具有声学听力保留的成年 CI 接受者进行了语音识别在半扩散噪声和主观听力困难估计的测量:1)CI 单独,2)双模(CI+HA),和最佳辅助 EAS(CIHA+HA)。结果表明,LF CI 截止频率对三种听力条件中的任何一种都没有影响,因此,没有随着 LF CI 截止频率的增加而导致性能提高或主观听力困难减少的趋势,这是相对于基底 SG 位置频率而言的。与过去的研究一致,当前的结果也与双模(CI+HA)和最佳辅助 EAS(CIHA+HA)的显著语音识别和主体听力困难益处一致,与 CI 单独听力相比,以及与双模听力(CI+HA)相比,最佳辅助 EAS(CIHA+HA)的显著额外益处。未来的研究有必要调查 SG 位置为基础的 fittings 的效果:i)对于经历过感知适应的经验丰富的 EAS 听众的大型样本,他们已经适应了标准 CI 频率分配提供的频率不匹配,ii)对于接近 CI 激活的 EAS 用户,基于位置的方法可能最终会产生更大的效果,特别是对于新激活的 CI 用户,基于位置的方法可能会为他们提供更陡峭的性能渐近线。

相似文献

1
Cochlear implant spectral bandwidth for optimizing electric and acoustic stimulation (EAS).
Hear Res. 2022 Dec;426:108584. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2022.108584. Epub 2022 Jul 28.
4
Phantom Stimulation for Cochlear Implant Users With Residual Low-Frequency Hearing.
Ear Hear. 2022 Mar/Apr;43(2):631-645. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000001121.
6
An overview of factors affecting bimodal and electric-acoustic stimulation (EAS) speech understanding outcomes.
Hear Res. 2023 Apr;431:108736. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2023.108736. Epub 2023 Mar 5.
7
Binaural cue sensitivity in cochlear implant recipients with acoustic hearing preservation.
Hear Res. 2020 May;390:107929. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2020.107929. Epub 2020 Feb 26.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

1
The Reality of Hearing Preservation in Cochlear Implantation: Who Is Utilizing EAS?
Otol Neurotol. 2021 Jul 1;42(6):832-837. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000003074.
2
Effectiveness of Place-based Mapping in Electric-Acoustic Stimulation Devices.
Otol Neurotol. 2021 Jan;42(1):197-202. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000002965.
4
Effects of noise on integration of acoustic and electric hearing within and across ears.
PLoS One. 2020 Oct 15;15(10):e0240752. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0240752. eCollection 2020.
5
Acceptance and Benefits of Electro-Acoustic Stimulation for Conventional-Length Electrode Arrays.
Audiol Neurootol. 2021;26(1):17-26. doi: 10.1159/000507975. Epub 2020 Jul 28.
6
Binaural cue sensitivity in cochlear implant recipients with acoustic hearing preservation.
Hear Res. 2020 May;390:107929. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2020.107929. Epub 2020 Feb 26.
7
Interaction Between Electric and Acoustic Stimulation Influences Speech Perception in Ipsilateral EAS Users.
Ear Hear. 2020 Jul/Aug;41(4):868-882. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000807.
8
Pitch Matching Adapts Even for Bilateral Cochlear Implant Users with Relatively Small Initial Pitch Differences Across the Ears.
J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2019 Dec;20(6):595-603. doi: 10.1007/s10162-019-00733-3. Epub 2019 Aug 5.
9
Validating a New Tablet-based Tool in the Determination of Cochlear Implant Angular Insertion Depth.
Otol Neurotol. 2019 Sep;40(8):1006-1010. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000002296.
10
The effect of cross-over frequency on binaural hearing performance of adults using electric-acoustic stimulation.
Cochlear Implants Int. 2019 Jul;20(4):190-206. doi: 10.1080/14670100.2019.1590499. Epub 2019 Mar 18.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验