培训早期职业研究人员使用元研究来改进科学：一种参与者引导的“边做边学”方法。
Training early career researchers to use meta-research to improve science: A participant-guided "learn by doing" approach.
机构信息
QUEST-Quality | Ethics | Open Science | Translation, Charité -Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin Institute of Health (BIH), Berlin, Germany.
出版信息
PLoS Biol. 2021 Feb 24;19(2):e3001073. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3001073. eCollection 2021 Feb.
Abstract
Meta-research, or the science of science, is a powerful technique that scientists can use to improve science, however most scientists are unaware that meta-research exists and courses are rare. This initiative demonstrates the feasibility of a participant-guided "learn by doing" approach, in which a multidisciplinary, global team of early career researchers learned meta-research skills by working together to design, conduct and publish a meta-research study.
摘要
元研究，或科学的科学，是一种强大的技术，科学家可以用它来改进科学，但是大多数科学家不知道元研究的存在，而且课程也很少。这项倡议展示了一种参与者指导的“边做边学”方法的可行性，在这种方法中，一个多学科、全球化的早期职业研究人员团队通过共同设计、进行和发表一项元研究来学习元研究技能。
相似文献
1
Training early career researchers to use meta-research to improve science: A participant-guided "learn by doing" approach.培训早期职业研究人员使用元研究来改进科学：一种参与者引导的“边做边学”方法。
PLoS Biol. 2021 Feb 24;19(2):e3001073. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3001073. eCollection 2021 Feb.
2
The Multidisciplinary Translational Team (MTT) Model for Training and Development of Translational Research Investigators.用于培训和发展转化研究人员的多学科转化团队（MTT）模式
Clin Transl Sci. 2015 Oct;8(5):533-41. doi: 10.1111/cts.12281. Epub 2015 May 23.
3
FameLab USA: Improving Science Communication Skills for Early Career Scientists.美国 FameLab：提高早期职业科学家的科学传播技能。
Astrobiology. 2019 Apr;19(4):614-623. doi: 10.1089/ast.2017.1809. Epub 2019 Mar 11.
4
Implementing and Evaluating a Mentor Training to Improve Support for Early-Career Scholars in Tobacco Regulatory Science.实施和评估导师培训以改善对烟草监管科学领域早期职业学者的支持。
Nicotine Tob Res. 2020 May 26;22(6):1041-1045. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntz083.
5
Graduate Education for the Future: New Models and Methods for the Clinical and Translational Workforce.面向未来的研究生教育：临床与转化人才培养的新模式与新方法。
Clin Transl Sci. 2015 Dec;8(6):787-92. doi: 10.1111/cts.12359. Epub 2015 Dec 8.
6
The Next Generation Scientist program: capacity-building for future scientific leaders in low- and middle-income countries.下一代科学家计划：为中低收入国家未来的科学领袖提供能力建设。
BMC Med Educ. 2018 Oct 10;18(1):233. doi: 10.1186/s12909-018-1331-y.
7
Training the translational scientist.培养转化型科学家。
Sci Transl Med. 2010 Dec 22;2(63):63mr2. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.3001632.
8
Undergraduate research experiences support science career decisions and active learning.本科研究经历有助于做出科学职业决策并促进主动学习。
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2007 Winter;6(4):297-306. doi: 10.1187/cbe.07-06-0039.
9
Reimagining Institutional Research Training: Coordinating a Highly Interactive Community of Young Investigators Prepared to Excel.重新构想机构研究培训：协调一个准备脱颖而出的高度互动的青年研究人员社区。
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2020 Sep 7;15(9):1361-1363. doi: 10.2215/CJN.14741219. Epub 2020 Apr 3.
10
Design and Implementation of a Career Development Program for Physician-Scientists: Lessons Learned.医师科学家职业发展计划的设计与实施：经验教训。
Urogynecology (Phila). 2022 Aug 1;28(8):479-485. doi: 10.1097/SPV.0000000000001210. Epub 2022 May 30.
引用本文的文献
1
Curcumin and multiple health outcomes: critical umbrella review of intervention meta-analyses.姜黄素与多种健康结局：干预性荟萃分析的批判性伞状评价
Front Pharmacol. 2025 Jun 5;16:1601204. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2025.1601204. eCollection 2025.
2
Sports Metaresearch: An Emerging Discipline of Sport Science and Medicine.体育元研究：体育科学与医学的一个新兴学科。
Sports Med. 2025 Apr;55(4):845-856. doi: 10.1007/s40279-025-02181-x. Epub 2025 Apr 1.
3
On the value of meta-research for early career researchers: A commentary.关于元研究对早期职业研究人员的价值：一篇评论。
JCPP Adv. 2024 Apr 24;4(2):e12235. doi: 10.1002/jcv2.12235. eCollection 2024 Jun.
4
Shortcut citations in the methods section: Frequency, problems, and strategies for responsible reuse.方法部分的快捷引文：负责任地重复使用的频率、问题和策略。
PLoS Biol. 2024 Apr 2;22(4):e3002562. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3002562. eCollection 2024 Apr.
5
Eleven strategies for making reproducible research and open science training the norm at research institutions.在研究机构中推广可重复性研究和开放科学培训的十一种策略。
Elife. 2023 Nov 23;12:e89736. doi: 10.7554/eLife.89736.
6
Blind spots on western blots: Assessment of common problems in western blot figures and methods reporting with recommendations to improve them.免疫印迹中的盲区：对免疫印迹图谱和方法报告中常见问题的评估，并提出改进建议。
PLoS Biol. 2022 Sep 12;20(9):e3001783. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3001783. eCollection 2022 Sep.
7
Finding the best fit for improving reproducibility: reflections from the QUEST Center for Responsible Research.寻找提高可重复性的最佳契合点：负责任研究 QUEST 中心的反思。
BMC Res Notes. 2022 Aug 3;15(1):270. doi: 10.1186/s13104-022-06108-x.
8
Recommendations for empowering early career researchers to improve research culture and practice.促进早期职业研究者赋权以改善研究文化和实践的建议。
PLoS Biol. 2022 Jul 7;20(7):e3001680. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3001680. eCollection 2022 Jul.
9
Creating clear and informative image-based figures for scientific publications.为科学出版物创建清晰且信息量丰富的基于图像的图表。
PLoS Biol. 2021 Mar 31;19(3):e3001161. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3001161. eCollection 2021 Mar.
本文引用的文献
1
Creating clear and informative image-based figures for scientific publications.为科学出版物创建清晰且信息量丰富的基于图像的图表。
PLoS Biol. 2021 Mar 31;19(3):e3001161. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3001161. eCollection 2021 Mar.
2
Why we need to report more than 'Data were Analyzed by t-tests or ANOVA'.为何我们需要报告的不仅仅是“采用 t 检验或 ANOVA 进行数据分析”。
Elife. 2018 Dec 21;7:e36163. doi: 10.7554/eLife.36163.
3
Data availability, reusability, and analytic reproducibility: evaluating the impact of a mandatory open data policy at the journal .数据可用性、可重用性和分析可重复性：评估期刊强制开放数据政策的影响
R Soc Open Sci. 2018 Aug 15;5(8):180448. doi: 10.1098/rsos.180448. eCollection 2018 Aug.
4
What exactly is 'N' in cell culture and animal experiments?细胞培养和动物实验中的“N”到底是什么？
PLoS Biol. 2018 Apr 4;16(4):e2005282. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.2005282. eCollection 2018 Apr.
5
Meta-research: Why research on research matters.元研究：为何研究研究很重要。
PLoS Biol. 2018 Mar 13;16(3):e2005468. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.2005468. eCollection 2018 Mar.
6
Transparent reporting of research results in eLife.eLife 中研究结果的透明报告。
Elife. 2016 Sep 9;5:e21070. doi: 10.7554/eLife.21070.
7
Transparency Is the Key to Quality.透明度是质量的关键。
J Biol Chem. 2015 Dec 11;290(50):29692-4. doi: 10.1074/jbc.E115.000002.
8
Beyond bar and line graphs: time for a new data presentation paradigm.超越柱状图和折线图：是时候采用新的数据呈现范式了。
PLoS Biol. 2015 Apr 22;13(4):e1002128. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1002128. eCollection 2015 Apr.
9
The need for randomization in animal trials: an overview of systematic reviews.动物试验中随机化的必要性：系统评价概述。
PLoS One. 2014 Jun 6;9(6):e98856. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0098856. eCollection 2014.
10
Power failure: why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience.停电：为什么小样本量会破坏神经科学的可靠性。
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2013 May;14(5):365-76. doi: 10.1038/nrn3475. Epub 2013 Apr 10.
Zotero 插件