European Commission, Joint Research Centre (JRC), Via E. Fermi 2749 - TP 127, I-21027, Ispra, Italy.
Department of Epidemiology and Data Science, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam Public Health institute, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Feb 24;21(1):173. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-06148-2.
In 2017, the European Commission's Joint Research Centre (JRC) started developing a methodological framework for a guideline-based quality assurance (QA) scheme to improve cancer quality of care. During the first phase of the work, inconsistency emerged about the use of terminology for the definition, the conceptual underpinnings and the way QA relates to health questions that are answered in guidelines. The objective of this final of three articles is to propose a conceptual framework for an integrated approach to guideline and QA development and clarify terms and definitions for key elements. This work will inform the upcoming European Commission Initiative on Colorectal Cancer (ECICC).
A multidisciplinary group of 23 experts from key organizations in the fields of guideline development, performance measurement and quality assurance participated in a mixed method approach including face-to-face dialogue and several rounds of virtual meetings. Informed by results of a systematic literature review that indicated absence of an existing framework and practical examples, we first identified the relations of key elements in guideline-based QA and then developed appropriate concepts and terminology to provide guidance.
Our framework connects the three key concepts of quality indicators, performance measures and performance indicators integrated with guideline development. Quality indicators are constructs used as a guide to monitor, evaluate, and improve the quality of the structure, process and outcomes of healthcare services; performance measures are tools that quantify or describe measurable elements of practice performance; and performance indicators are quantifiable and measurable units or scores of practice, which should be guided by guideline recommendations.
The inconsistency in the way key terms of QA are used and defined has confused the field. Our conceptual framework defines the role, meaning and interactions of the key elements for improving quality in healthcare. It directly builds on the questions asked in guidelines and answered through recommendations. These findings will be applied in the forthcoming ECICC and for the future updates of ECIBC. These are large-scale integrated projects aimed at improving healthcare quality across Europe through the development of guideline-based QA schemes; this will help in implementing and improving our approach.
2017 年,欧盟委员会联合研究中心(JRC)开始制定基于指南的质量保证(QA)计划的方法框架,以提高癌症护理质量。在工作的第一阶段,对于 QA 的定义、概念基础以及与指南中回答的健康问题的关系的术语使用出现了不一致。本文的最后一篇(共三篇)的目的是为指南和 QA 开发的综合方法提出一个概念框架,并阐明关键要素的术语和定义。这项工作将为即将推出的欧盟委员会结直肠癌倡议(ECICC)提供信息。
一个由来自指南制定、绩效测量和质量保证领域的 23 名关键组织的多学科专家组成的小组,参与了一种混合方法,包括面对面对话和几轮虚拟会议。根据系统文献回顾的结果,即缺乏现有框架和实际示例,我们首先确定了基于指南的 QA 的关键要素之间的关系,然后开发了适当的概念和术语来提供指导。
我们的框架将质量指标、绩效测量和与指南开发相结合的绩效指标这三个关键概念联系起来。质量指标是用于指导监测、评估和改善医疗保健服务的结构、过程和结果质量的结构;绩效测量是量化或描述实践绩效的可测量要素的工具;绩效指标是实践的可量化和可测量的单位或分数,应该由指南建议指导。
QA 关键术语的使用和定义方式的不一致使该领域感到困惑。我们的概念框架定义了改善医疗保健质量的关键要素的作用、意义和相互作用。它直接建立在指南中提出的问题和通过建议回答的问题之上。这些发现将应用于即将推出的 ECICC 和 ECIBC 的未来更新。这些是大型综合项目,旨在通过制定基于指南的 QA 计划来提高整个欧洲的医疗保健质量;这将有助于实施和改进我们的方法。