• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

欧盟委员会乳腺癌指南倡议的制定方法:指南透明时代的建议。

Methods for Development of the European Commission Initiative on Breast Cancer Guidelines: Recommendations in the Era of Guideline Transparency.

机构信息

McMaster University Health Sciences Centre, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada (H.J.S.).

European Commission, Joint Research Centre, Ispra, Italy (D.L., N.D., Z.S.).

出版信息

Ann Intern Med. 2019 Aug 20;171(4):273-280. doi: 10.7326/M18-3445. Epub 2019 Jul 23.

DOI:10.7326/M18-3445
PMID:31330534
Abstract

Neither breast cancer prevention and early-detection programs, nor their outcomes, are uniform across Europe. This article describes the rationale, methods, and process for development of the European Commission (EC) Initiative on Breast Cancer Screening and Diagnosis Guidelines. To be consistent with standards set by the Institute of Medicine and others, the EC followed 6 general principles. First, the EC selected, via an open call, a panel with broad representation of areas of expertise. Second, it ensured that all recommendations were supported by systematic reviews. Third, the EC separately considered important subgroups of women, included patient advocates in the guidelines development group, and focused on good communication to inform women's decisions. Fourth, EC rules on conflicts of interest were followed and the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) Evidence to Decision frameworks were used to structure the process and minimize the influence of competing interests. Fifth, it focused its recommendations on outcomes that matter to women, and certainty of the evidence is rated for each. Sixth, the EC elicited stakeholder feedback to ensure that the recommendations remain up to date and relevant to practice. This article describes the approach and highlights ways of disseminating and adapting the recommendations both within and outside Europe, using innovative information technology tools.

摘要

乳腺癌预防和早期检测计划及其结果在欧洲并不统一。本文描述了制定欧盟委员会(EC)乳腺癌筛查和诊断指南倡议的基本原理、方法和流程。为了与医学研究所和其他机构制定的标准保持一致,EC 遵循了 6 条总体原则。首先,EC 通过公开征集,选择了一个具有广泛专业知识代表性的小组。其次,它确保所有建议都得到系统评价的支持。第三,EC 分别考虑了女性的重要亚组,包括将患者代言人纳入指南制定小组,并专注于良好的沟通,以告知女性的决策。第四,遵守 EC 关于利益冲突的规定,并使用 GRADE(推荐评估、制定和评估分级)证据决策框架来构建流程,最大限度地减少利益竞争的影响。第五,它将建议重点放在对女性重要的结果上,并对每项证据的确定性进行评级。第六,EC 征求利益相关者的反馈意见,以确保建议保持最新,并与实践相关。本文介绍了该方法,并重点介绍了在欧洲内外传播和调整建议的方法,使用了创新的信息技术工具。

相似文献

1
Methods for Development of the European Commission Initiative on Breast Cancer Guidelines: Recommendations in the Era of Guideline Transparency.欧盟委员会乳腺癌指南倡议的制定方法:指南透明时代的建议。
Ann Intern Med. 2019 Aug 20;171(4):273-280. doi: 10.7326/M18-3445. Epub 2019 Jul 23.
2
["European Commission Initiative on Breast Cancer": Selected Breast Cancer Screening Recommendations from the European Guidelines.].["欧盟委员会乳腺癌倡议:欧洲指南中选定的乳腺癌筛查建议。"]
Rev Esp Salud Publica. 2020 Dec 16;94:e202012179.
3
Breast Cancer Screening and Diagnosis: A Synopsis of the European Breast Guidelines.乳腺癌筛查与诊断:欧洲乳腺指南概要。
Ann Intern Med. 2020 Jan 7;172(1):46-56. doi: 10.7326/M19-2125. Epub 2019 Nov 26.
4
Contextual differences considered in the Tunisian ADOLOPMENT of the European guidelines on breast cancer screening.突尼斯在采用欧洲乳腺癌筛查指南时所考虑的背景差异。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2021 May 13;19(1):80. doi: 10.1186/s12961-021-00731-z.
5
Recommendations from the international evidence-based guideline for the assessment and management of polycystic ovary syndrome.国际循证指南关于多囊卵巢综合征评估和管理的推荐意见。
Fertil Steril. 2018 Aug;110(3):364-379. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2018.05.004. Epub 2018 Jul 19.
6
Updated recommendations for breast cancer screening.乳腺癌筛查更新建议。
Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2010 Dec;22(6):498-505. doi: 10.1097/GCO.0b013e3283404e71.
7
Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany.德国药品效益评估的程序和方法。
Eur J Health Econ. 2008 Nov;9 Suppl 1:5-29. doi: 10.1007/s10198-008-0122-5.
8
[Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany].[德国药品效益评估的程序和方法]
Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 2008 Dec;133 Suppl 7:S225-46. doi: 10.1055/s-0028-1100954. Epub 2008 Nov 25.
9
Guidelines for early detection of breast cancer in Brazil. I - Development methods.巴西乳腺癌早期检测指南。I - 制定方法。
Cad Saude Publica. 2018 Jun 21;34(6):e00116317. doi: 10.1590/0102-311X00116317.
10
Recommendations from the international evidence-based guideline for the assessment and management of polycystic ovary syndrome.多囊卵巢综合征评估与管理的国际循证指南推荐意见。
Hum Reprod. 2018 Sep 1;33(9):1602-1618. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dey256.

引用本文的文献

1
Italian adaptation of the European guidelines for breast cancer diagnosis, staging, and preoperative planning: a GRADE-ADOLOPMENT approach.《欧洲乳腺癌诊断、分期及术前规划指南》的意大利语改编版:一种GRADE-ADOLOPMENT方法
Radiol Med. 2025 Aug 18. doi: 10.1007/s11547-025-02065-0.
2
Cancer screening in patients with acromegaly: a plea for a personalized approach and international registries.肢端肥大症患者的癌症筛查:呼吁采用个性化方法并建立国际登记系统。
Rev Endocr Metab Disord. 2025 Mar 15. doi: 10.1007/s11154-025-09957-6.
3
Microwave imaging for breast cancer screening: protocol for an open, multicentric, interventional, prospective, non-randomised clinical investigation to evaluate cancer detection capabilities of MammoWave system on an asymptomatic population across multiple European countries.
用于乳腺癌筛查的微波成象:一项开放性、多中心、介入性、前瞻性、非随机临床研究的方案,旨在评估 MammoWave 系统在多个欧洲国家的无症状人群中对癌症检测能力。
BMJ Open. 2024 Nov 2;14(11):e088431. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-088431.
4
Sample size calculation for data reliability and diagnostic performance: a go-to review.数据可靠性和诊断性能的样本量计算:综述。
Eur Radiol Exp. 2024 Jul 5;8(1):79. doi: 10.1186/s41747-024-00474-w.
5
Comprehensive characterization of stemness-related lncRNAs in triple-negative breast cancer identified a novel prognostic signature related to treatment outcomes, immune landscape analysis and therapeutic guidance: a silico analysis with in vivo experiments.三阴性乳腺癌中与干性相关的长链非编码 RNA 的全面特征分析:一项与治疗结果、免疫图谱分析和治疗指导相关的新型预后标志物的计算分析及体内实验验证。
J Transl Med. 2024 May 4;22(1):423. doi: 10.1186/s12967-024-05237-0.
6
The paradox of MRI for breast cancer screening: high-risk and dense breasts-available evidence and current practice.乳腺癌筛查中MRI的悖论:高危和致密型乳腺——现有证据及当前实践
Insights Imaging. 2024 Mar 27;15(1):96. doi: 10.1186/s13244-024-01653-4.
7
Conducting a health technology assessment in the West Bank, occupied Palestinian territory: lessons from a feasibility project.在被占领的巴勒斯坦西岸进行卫生技术评估:可行性项目的经验教训。
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2024 Feb 15;40(1):e12. doi: 10.1017/S0266462324000084.
8
World Allergy Organization (WAO) Diagnosis and Rationale for Action against Cow's Milk Allergy (DRACMA) Guidelines update - I - Plan and definitions.世界过敏组织(WAO)牛奶过敏诊断与治疗原理指南(DRACMA)更新——I. 计划与定义
World Allergy Organ J. 2022 Feb 1;15(1):100609. doi: 10.1016/j.waojou.2021.100609. eCollection 2022 Jan.
9
Comparison of clinical practice guidelines on radiation dermatitis: a narrative review.比较辐射性皮炎临床实践指南:叙述性综述。
Support Care Cancer. 2022 Jun;30(6):4663-4674. doi: 10.1007/s00520-022-06829-6. Epub 2022 Jan 24.
10
Benefits and harms of annual, biennial, or triennial breast cancer mammography screening for women at average risk of breast cancer: a systematic review for the European Commission Initiative on Breast Cancer (ECIBC).每年、每两年或每三年对平均乳腺癌风险女性进行乳腺癌筛查的获益和危害:欧盟委员会乳腺癌倡议(ECIBC)的系统评价。
Br J Cancer. 2022 Mar;126(4):673-688. doi: 10.1038/s41416-021-01521-8. Epub 2021 Nov 26.