Suppr超能文献

急性胆囊炎管理中的医疗保健差异:种族、性别和社会经济因素对胆囊切除术与经皮胆囊造口术的影响。

Healthcare Disparities in the Management of Acute Cholecystitis: Impact of Race, Gender, and Socioeconomic Factors on Cholecystectomy vs Percutaneous Cholecystostomy.

机构信息

Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Endoscopy, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 75 Francis Street, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.

Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.

出版信息

J Gastrointest Surg. 2021 Apr;25(4):880-886. doi: 10.1007/s11605-021-04959-6. Epub 2021 Feb 24.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

While percutaneous cholecystostomy (PC) is a recommended treatment strategy in lieu of cholecystectomy (CCY) for acute cholecystitis among patients who may not be considered good surgical candidates, reports on disparities in treatment utilization remain limited. The aim of this study was to investigate the role of demographic, clinical, and socioeconomic factors in treatment of acute cholecystitis.

METHODS

Patients with a diagnosis of acute cholecystitis who underwent CCY versus PC were reviewed from the U.S. Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) database between 2008-2014. Measured variables including age, race/ethnicity, Charlson comorbidity index (CCI), hospital type/region, insurance payer, household income, length of stay (LOS), hospital cost, and mortality were compared using chi-square and ANOVA. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to identify specific predictors of cholecystitis treatment.

RESULTS

A total of 1,492,877 patients (CCY:n=1,435,255 versus PC:n=57,622) were analyzed. The majority of patients that received PC were at urban teaching hospitals (65.2%). LOS was significantly longer with higher associated costs for PC [(11.1±11.0 versus 4.5±5.3 days; P<0.001) and ($99577±138850 versus $48399±58330; P<0.001)]. Mortality was also increased for patients that received PC compared to CCY (8.8% versus 0.6%; P<0.001). Multivariable regression demonstrated multiple socioeconomic and healthcare-related factors influencing the utilization of PC including male gender, Black or Asian race/ethnicity, Medicare payer status, urban hospital location, and household income (all P<0.001).

CONCLUSION

Although patients receiving PC had higher CCI scores, multiple socioeconomic and healthcare related factors appeared to also influence this treatment decision. Additional studies to investigate these disparities are indicated to improve outcomes for all individuals with this condition.

摘要

背景

虽然经皮胆囊造口术(PC)是一种推荐的治疗策略,可替代可能不被认为是良好手术候选者的急性胆囊炎患者的胆囊切除术(CCY),但关于治疗利用差异的报告仍然有限。本研究旨在探讨人口统计学、临床和社会经济因素在急性胆囊炎治疗中的作用。

方法

从 2008 年至 2014 年,从美国全国住院患者样本(NIS)数据库中回顾了接受 CCY 与 PC 的急性胆囊炎患者。使用卡方检验和 ANOVA 比较了年龄、种族/民族、Charlson 合并症指数(CCI)、医院类型/地区、保险支付人、家庭收入、住院时间(LOS)、医院费用和死亡率等测量变量。采用多变量逻辑回归分析确定胆囊炎治疗的特定预测因素。

结果

共分析了 1492877 例患者(CCY:n=1435255 例,PC:n=57622 例)。接受 PC 的大多数患者是城市教学医院(65.2%)。PC 的 LOS 明显更长,相关费用也更高[(11.1±11.0 与 4.5±5.3 天;P<0.001)和($99577±138850 与 $48399±58330;P<0.001)]。与 CCY 相比,接受 PC 的患者死亡率也更高(8.8%与 0.6%;P<0.001)。多变量回归显示,影响 PC 使用的多种社会经济和医疗相关因素包括男性性别、黑人和亚洲种族/民族、医疗保险支付人状态、城市医院位置和家庭收入(均 P<0.001)。

结论

尽管接受 PC 的患者 CCI 评分较高,但多种社会经济和医疗相关因素似乎也影响了这一治疗决策。需要进一步研究这些差异,以改善所有患有这种疾病的人的结局。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验