• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经皮胆囊造口术:预后因素及与胆囊切除术的比较。

Percutaneous cholecystostomy: prognostic factors and comparison to cholecystectomy.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, The University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.

The Malcom Randall Veterans Affairs Medical Center, 1601 SW Archer Road, Gainesville, FL, 32608, USA.

出版信息

Surg Endosc. 2017 Nov;31(11):4568-4575. doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5517-x. Epub 2017 Apr 13.

DOI:10.1007/s00464-017-5517-x
PMID:28409378
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5733717/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Data regarding long-term outcomes following percutaneous cholecystostomy (PC) are limited, and comparisons to cholecystectomy (CCY) are lacking. We hypothesized that chronic disease burden would predict 1-year mortality following PC, and that outcomes following PC and CCY would be similar when controlling for preprocedural risk factors.

METHODS

We performed a 10-year retrospective cohort analysis of patients with acute cholecystitis managed by PC (n = 114) or CCY (n = 234). Treatment response was assessed by systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) criteria at PC/CCY and 72 h later. Logistic regression identified predictors of 30-day and 1-year mortality following PC. PC and CCY patients were matched by age, Tokyo Guidelines (TG13) cholecystitis severity grade, and VASQIP calculator predicted mortality (n = 42/group).

RESULTS

The presence of SIRS at 72 h following PC was associated with 30-day mortality [OR 8.9 (95% CI 2.6-30)]. SIRS at 72 h was present in and 21.4% of all PC patients, significantly higher than unmatched CCY patients (4.7%, p = 0.048). Independent predictors of 1-year mortality following PC were DNR status [19.7 (2.1-186)], disseminated cancer [7.5 (2.1-26)], and congestive heart failure [3.9 (1.4-11)]. PC patients with none of these risk factors had 17.9% 90-day mortality and no deaths after 90 days; late deaths continued to occur among patients with DNR, CHF, or disseminated cancer. At baseline, PC patients had greater acute and chronic disease burden than CCY patients. After matching, PC and CCY patients had similar age (69 vs. 70 years), TG13 grade (2.4 vs. 2.4), and predicted 30-day mortality (5.5 vs. 6.8%). Matched PC patients had higher 30-day mortality (14.3 vs. 2.4%, p = 0.109) and 180-day mortality (28.6 vs. 7.1%, p = 0.048).

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment response to PC predicted 30-day mortality; DNR status, and chronic diseases predicted 1-year mortality. Although the matching procedure did not eliminate selection bias, PC was associated with persistent systemic inflammation and higher long-term mortality than CCY.

摘要

背景

经皮胆囊造口术(PC)后长期结果的数据有限,且缺乏与胆囊切除术(CCY)的比较。我们假设慢性疾病负担会预测 PC 后 1 年的死亡率,并且在控制术前风险因素后,PC 和 CCY 的结果将相似。

方法

我们对接受 PC(n=114)或 CCY(n=234)治疗的急性胆囊炎患者进行了 10 年回顾性队列分析。通过 PC/CCY 时和 72 小时后的全身炎症反应综合征(SIRS)标准评估治疗反应。Logistic 回归确定了 PC 后 30 天和 1 年死亡率的预测因素。根据年龄、东京指南(TG13)胆囊炎严重程度等级和 VASQIP 计算器预测死亡率(n=42/组)对 PC 和 CCY 患者进行匹配。

结果

PC 后 72 小时时存在 SIRS 与 30 天死亡率相关[OR 8.9(95%CI 2.6-30)]。PC 患者中有 21.4%存在 SIRS,明显高于未匹配的 CCY 患者(4.7%,p=0.048)。PC 后 1 年死亡率的独立预测因素为 DNR 状态[19.7(2.1-186)]、播散性癌症[7.5(2.1-26)]和充血性心力衰竭[3.9(1.4-11)]。没有这些危险因素的 PC 患者 90 天死亡率为 17.9%,90 天后无死亡;DNR、CHF 或播散性癌症患者仍继续发生晚期死亡。在基线时,PC 患者的急性和慢性疾病负担均大于 CCY 患者。匹配后,PC 和 CCY 患者的年龄(69 岁与 70 岁)、TG13 分级(2.4 与 2.4)和预测 30 天死亡率(5.5%与 6.8%)相似。匹配的 PC 患者的 30 天死亡率(14.3%比 2.4%,p=0.109)和 180 天死亡率(28.6%比 7.1%,p=0.048)更高。

结论

PC 的治疗反应预测了 30 天的死亡率;DNR 状态和慢性疾病预测了 1 年的死亡率。尽管匹配程序并未消除选择偏倚,但与 CCY 相比,PC 与持续的全身炎症和更高的长期死亡率相关。

相似文献

1
Percutaneous cholecystostomy: prognostic factors and comparison to cholecystectomy.经皮胆囊造口术:预后因素及与胆囊切除术的比较。
Surg Endosc. 2017 Nov;31(11):4568-4575. doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5517-x. Epub 2017 Apr 13.
2
Percutaneous Cholecystostomy in Acute Cholecystitis-Predictors of Recurrence and Interval Cholecystectomy.急性胆囊炎经皮胆囊造瘘术——复发及择期胆囊切除术的预测因素
J Surg Res. 2018 Dec;232:539-546. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2018.06.051. Epub 2018 Aug 3.
3
Revisiting percutaneous cholecystostomy for acute cholecystitis based on a 10-year experience.基于10年经验重新审视经皮胆囊造瘘术治疗急性胆囊炎
Arch Surg. 2012 May;147(5):416-22. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.2012.135.
4
Finding the Most Favorable Timing for Cholecystectomy after Percutaneous Cholecystostomy Tube Placement: An Analysis of Institutional and National Data.经皮胆囊穿刺置管引流后行胆囊切除术的最佳时机选择:机构和国家数据的分析。
J Am Coll Surg. 2021 Jan;232(1):55-64. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2020.10.010. Epub 2020 Oct 21.
5
Antibiotics May be Safely Discontinued Within One Week of Percutaneous Cholecystostomy.经皮胆囊造瘘术后一周内可安全停用抗生素。
World J Surg. 2017 May;41(5):1239-1245. doi: 10.1007/s00268-016-3861-y.
6
Healthcare Disparities in the Management of Acute Cholecystitis: Impact of Race, Gender, and Socioeconomic Factors on Cholecystectomy vs Percutaneous Cholecystostomy.急性胆囊炎管理中的医疗保健差异:种族、性别和社会经济因素对胆囊切除术与经皮胆囊造口术的影响。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2021 Apr;25(4):880-886. doi: 10.1007/s11605-021-04959-6. Epub 2021 Feb 24.
7
Routine surveillance cholangiography after percutaneous cholecystostomy delays drain removal and cholecystectomy.经皮胆囊造瘘术后进行常规监测胆管造影会延迟引流管拔除和胆囊切除术。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2017 Feb;82(2):351-355. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000001315.
8
Percutaneous cholecystostomy-tube for high-risk patients with acute cholecystitis: current practice and implications for future research.经皮胆囊造瘘术-高危急性胆囊炎患者:当前实践与未来研究意义。
Surg Endosc. 2019 Oct;33(10):3396-3403. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-06634-5. Epub 2019 Jan 2.
9
Outcome comparison between percutaneous cholecystostomy and cholecystectomy: a 10-year population-based analysis.经皮胆囊造瘘术与胆囊切除术的疗效比较:一项基于人群的10年分析。
BMC Surg. 2017 Dec 7;17(1):130. doi: 10.1186/s12893-017-0327-6.
10
Persistent acute cholecystitis after cholecystostomy - increased mortality due to treatment approach?经胆囊造口术后持续性急性胆囊炎 - 治疗方法导致死亡率增加?
HPB (Oxford). 2022 Jun;24(6):963-973. doi: 10.1016/j.hpb.2021.11.006. Epub 2021 Nov 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Optimal timing of laparoscopic cholecystectomy after percutaneous gallbladder drainage in patients with acute calculous cholecystitis: A retrospective comparative study.急性结石性胆囊炎患者经皮胆囊引流术后腹腔镜胆囊切除术的最佳时机:一项回顾性比较研究。
Ann Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2025 Aug 31;29(3):286-292. doi: 10.14701/ahbps.25-062. Epub 2025 Jun 18.
2
A new method for predicting SIRS after percutaneous transhepatic gallbladder drainage.经皮经肝胆囊引流术后全身炎症反应综合征的一种新预测方法。
Sci Rep. 2023 Dec 6;13(1):21523. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-48908-6.
3
What is the effect of percutaneous cholesistostomy in patients with acute cholecystitis? when is the right time for the procedure?经皮胆囊造口术对急性胆囊炎患者的影响如何?何时是进行该手术的合适时机?
Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2023 Oct 27;29(11):1269-1279. doi: 10.14744/tjtes.2023.40090.
4
Management of Acute Cholecystitis in High-Risk Patients: Percutaneous Gallbladder Drainage as a Definitive Treatment vs. Emergency Cholecystectomy-Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.高危患者急性胆囊炎的管理:经皮胆囊引流作为确定性治疗与急诊胆囊切除术的系统评价和荟萃分析
J Clin Med. 2023 Jul 26;12(15):4903. doi: 10.3390/jcm12154903.
5
Does percutaneous cholecystostomy affect prognosis of patients with acute cholecystitis that are unresponsive to conservative treatment?经皮胆囊造口术是否会影响保守治疗无效的急性胆囊炎患者的预后?
Saudi J Gastroenterol. 2023 Nov-Dec;29(6):376-380. doi: 10.4103/sjg.sjg_87_23.
6
Impact of percutaneous cholecystostomy in the management of acute cholecystitis: a retrospective cohort study at a tertiary center.经皮胆囊造口术在急性胆囊炎治疗中的影响:一家三级中心的回顾性队列研究。
Updates Surg. 2023 Jun;75(4):905-914. doi: 10.1007/s13304-023-01499-3. Epub 2023 Mar 29.
7
Factors influencing failure to undergo interval cholecystectomy after percutaneous cholecystostomy among patients with acute cholecystitis: a retrospective study.影响急性胆囊炎患者经皮胆囊造瘘术后行胆囊切除术失败的因素:一项回顾性研究。
BMC Gastroenterol. 2021 Oct 29;21(1):410. doi: 10.1186/s12876-021-01989-x.
8
Outcomes of percutaneous cholecystostomy in elderly patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.老年患者经皮胆囊造瘘术的结局:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Prz Gastroenterol. 2021;16(3):188-195. doi: 10.5114/pg.2020.100658. Epub 2020 Nov 5.
9
Management of Patients With Acute Cholecystitis After Percutaneous Cholecystostomy: From the Acute Stage to Definitive Surgical Treatment.经皮胆囊造瘘术后急性胆囊炎患者的管理:从急性期到确定性手术治疗
Front Surg. 2021 Apr 15;8:616320. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2021.616320. eCollection 2021.
10
Cholecystectomy Vs. Cholecystostomy for the Management of Acute Cholecystitis in Elderly Patients.胆囊切除术与胆囊造口术治疗老年急性胆囊炎。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2019 Mar;23(3):503-509. doi: 10.1007/s11605-018-3863-1. Epub 2018 Sep 17.

本文引用的文献

1
Outcomes in Older Patients with Grade III Cholecystitis and Cholecystostomy Tube Placement: A Propensity Score Analysis.老年Ⅲ级胆囊炎患者行胆囊造瘘管置入术的结局:一项倾向评分分析
J Am Coll Surg. 2017 Apr;224(4):502-511.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2016.12.021. Epub 2017 Jan 6.
2
ROC-ing along: Evaluation and interpretation of receiver operating characteristic curves.一路前行:接收器操作特性曲线的评估与解读
Surgery. 2016 Jun;159(6):1638-1645. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2015.12.029. Epub 2016 Mar 5.
3
Thirty-Day Postoperative Mortality Risk Estimates and 1-Year Survival in Veterans Health Administration Surgery Patients.退伍军人事务部手术患者的 30 天术后死亡率估计和 1 年生存率。
JAMA Surg. 2016 May 1;151(5):417-22. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2015.4882.
4
Subtotal Cholecystectomy-"Fenestrating" vs "Reconstituting" Subtypes and the Prevention of Bile Duct Injury: Definition of the Optimal Procedure in Difficult Operative Conditions.胆囊次全切除术——“开窗式”与“重建式”亚型及胆管损伤的预防:困难手术条件下最佳术式的定义
J Am Coll Surg. 2016 Jan;222(1):89-96. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2015.09.019. Epub 2015 Oct 9.
5
Training vs practice: A tale of opposition in acute cholecystitis.培训与实践:急性胆囊炎中一对对立的故事。
World J Hepatol. 2015 Oct 18;7(23):2470-3. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v7.i23.2470.
6
Cholecystectomy vs. percutaneous cholecystostomy for the management of critically ill patients with acute cholecystitis: a protocol for a systematic review.胆囊切除术与经皮胆囊造瘘术治疗重症急性胆囊炎患者的比较:一项系统评价方案
Syst Rev. 2015 May 30;4:77. doi: 10.1186/s13643-015-0065-8.
7
Index cholecystectomy in grade II and III acute calculous cholecystitis is feasible and safe.二级和三级急性结石性胆囊炎的择期胆囊切除术是可行且安全的。
ANZ J Surg. 2015 Nov;85(11):854-9. doi: 10.1111/ans.12986. Epub 2015 Feb 2.
8
Optimal time for early laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis.急性胆囊炎行早期腹腔镜胆囊切除术的最佳时机。
JAMA Surg. 2015 Feb;150(2):129-36. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2014.2339.
9
The validity of the VA surgical risk tool in predicting postoperative mortality among octogenarians.退伍军人事务部(VA)手术风险工具在预测八旬老人术后死亡率方面的有效性。
Am J Surg. 2015 Feb;209(2):274-9. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2014.07.005. Epub 2014 Oct 13.
10
Assessing preoperative frailty utilizing validated geriatric mortality calculators and their association with postoperative hip fracture mortality risk.使用经过验证的老年死亡率计算器评估术前虚弱状况及其与术后髋部骨折死亡风险的关联。
Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil. 2014 Sep;5(3):109-15. doi: 10.1177/2151458514537272.