Independent researcher, West Leederville, Western Australia.
J Strength Cond Res. 2021 May 1;35(5):1425-1448. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000003959.
Nuzzo, JL. History of strength training research in man: an inventory and quantitative overview of studies published in English between 1894 and 1979. J Strength Cond Res 35(5): 1425-1448, 2021-Limited scholarship exists on the history of strength training research. The current review advances existing qualitative and biographical work by inventorying all experimental studies and case reports published before 1980 on the effects of ≥1 week of strength training on human health and function. Data on authors, journals, citations, study samples, training interventions, study outcomes, and study themes were extracted and summarized. Three hundred thirty-nine strength training studies were published between 1894 and 1979. Studies included 14,575 subjects, with 10,350 undergoing strength training. Subjects were usually healthy (81.1% of articles), university students (51.0%), or aged 18-65 years (86.7%). Men comprised 70.0% of subjects. Interventions typically involved isoinertial only (64.6%) or isometric only (35.4%) training. Upper-body interventions were more common (35.4%) than lower-body interventions (27.4%). Duration and frequency of training were typically 4-8 weeks (55.3%) and 3 days per week (39.2%), respectively. Isometric maximal voluntary contractions (54.0%) and one repetition maximum (20.4%) were the most common muscle strength tests. Other common outcomes included limb girths (20.9%) and muscle endurance (19.5%). Common research themes were physiology (54.3%), physical fitness (28.9%), and injury/rehabilitation (20.4%). The 339 studies have been cited 21,996 times. Moritani and deVries' 1979 article on time course of neuromuscular adaptations is the most highly cited (1,815 citations). DeLorme (5 articles and 772 citations), Hellebrandt (4 articles and 402 citations), Rasch (9 articles and 318 citations), and Berger (12 articles and 1,293 citations) made the largest contributions. Research Quarterly published the most articles (27.4%). The history of strength training research is discussed in the context of the results.
努佐，JL。人类力量训练研究史：1894 年至 1979 年间以英文发表的研究的清单和定量概述。J 力量与调理研究 35(5):1425-1448,2021-关于力量训练研究的历史，学术文献很少。目前的综述通过对 1980 年前发表的关于≥1 周力量训练对人类健康和功能影响的所有实验研究和案例报告进行编目，推进了现有的定性和传记工作。提取并总结了作者、期刊、引用、研究样本、训练干预、研究结果和研究主题的数据。1894 年至 1979 年间发表了 339 项力量训练研究。研究包括 14575 名受试者，其中 10350 名进行了力量训练。受试者通常是健康的（81.1%的文章），是大学生（51.0%）或年龄在 18-65 岁之间（86.7%）。男性占受试者的 70.0%。干预措施通常涉及等长（64.6%）或等长（35.4%）训练。上半身干预比下半身干预更为常见（35.4%对 27.4%）。训练的持续时间和频率通常为 4-8 周（55.3%）和每周 3 天（39.2%）。最常见的肌肉力量测试是等长最大自愿收缩（54.0%）和一次重复最大值（20.4%）。其他常见的结果包括肢体周长（20.9%）和肌肉耐力（19.5%）。常见的研究主题包括生理学（54.3%）、身体适应性（28.9%）和损伤/康复（20.4%）。339 项研究已被引用 21996 次。莫利塔尼和德弗里斯 1979 年关于神经肌肉适应的时程的文章是被引用最多的（1815 次引用）。德洛姆（5 篇文章和 772 次引用）、赫勒布兰德（4 篇文章和 402 次引用）、拉什（9 篇文章和 318 次引用）和伯杰（12 篇文章和 1293 次引用）做出了最大贡献。《研究季刊》发表的文章最多（27.4%）。本文在讨论结果时讨论了力量训练研究的历史。
