Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Centre Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.
JAMA Oncol. 2021 May 1;7(5):759-770. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2020.8072.
Patients with extrapulmonary neuroendocrine carcinomas (EPNECs) receive essentially the same treatment as those with small cell lung cancer (SCLC) despite differences in origin, clinical course, and survival. This SCLC-based approach is attributable to the rarity of EPNECs, which impedes the use of randomized clinical trials. However, neuroendocrine carcinomas are becoming more common because of the increasing use of systemic cancer therapy for adenocarcinomas. This treatment can transdifferentiate certain adenocarcinomas into neuroendocrine carcinomas. In addition, the treatment landscape for SCLC is slowly changing, potentially impacting the treatment paradigms for EPNECs.
New information on tumorigenesis of EPNECs from different origins, either as a primary malignant tumor or after neuroendocrine differentiation from adenocarcinomas, demonstrates their biological similarity. Activated molecular pathways that appear to underlie the development of EPNECs are potentially targetable, and some of these targets, such as poly(adenosine diphosphate-ribose) polymerase, Wee1, and Aurora A kinase, are currently under investigation. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) already constituted a new treatment modality for patients with SCLC and produced some promising results in patients with EPNECs.
Although only moderately effective, the introduction of ICIs signifies the first new option in systemic treatment of SCLC in decades. To prove the value of ICIs and other new drugs for patients with EPNECs, these patients should be included in clinical trials independent of the primary tumor site. Furthermore, to optimize clinical decision-making for patients with EPNECs, experts from the neuroendocrine tumor board should collaborate with members from tumor site-specific boards, which will require patient referral to a center with EPNEC expertise.
尽管起源、临床过程和生存情况不同,但患有肺外神经内分泌癌(EPNEC)的患者接受的治疗与小细胞肺癌(SCLC)患者基本相同。这种基于 SCLC 的治疗方法归因于 EPNEC 的罕见性,这阻碍了随机临床试验的使用。然而,由于越来越多地使用全身癌症疗法治疗腺癌,神经内分泌癌变得更加常见。这种治疗可以使某些腺癌向神经内分泌癌转化。此外,SCLC 的治疗格局正在缓慢变化,这可能会影响 EPNEC 的治疗模式。
不同起源的 EPNEC 肿瘤发生的新信息,无论是作为原发性恶性肿瘤还是腺癌神经内分泌分化后,都表明它们具有生物学相似性。似乎为 EPNEC 发展提供基础的激活分子途径是潜在可靶向的,其中一些靶点,如聚(腺苷二磷酸核糖)聚合酶、Wee1 和 Aurora A 激酶,目前正在研究中。免疫检查点抑制剂(ICI)已经成为 SCLC 患者的一种新的治疗方式,并在 EPNEC 患者中产生了一些有希望的结果。
尽管 ICI 的效果仅为中度有效,但它是几十年来 SCLC 系统治疗的第一个新选择。为了证明 ICI 和其他新药对 EPNEC 患者的价值,这些患者应独立于原发肿瘤部位纳入临床试验。此外,为了优化 EPNEC 患者的临床决策,神经内分泌肿瘤委员会的专家应与肿瘤部位特定委员会的成员合作,这将需要将患者转介至具有 EPNEC 专业知识的中心。