• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

公民再振兴运动有未来吗?

Does the Civic Renewal Movement Have a Future?

出版信息

Hastings Cent Rep. 2021 Jan;51 Suppl 1:S10-S14. doi: 10.1002/hast.1223.

DOI:10.1002/hast.1223
PMID:33630342
Abstract

A civic ideal is an ideal of deliberative self-governance. People who participate in discussing what their own groups should do are being civic. Civic venues, institutions, and habits have waned since the mid-1990s. In the 1990s, a movement arose to restore them, under the banner of "civic renewal." This movement was carefully nonpartisan, often impartial about specific issues, and interested in creating alternative settings that could complement such basic political institutions as Congress and elections. As the condition of democracy has worsened in recent years, this approach looks inadequate or irrelevant. The most promising sources of civic renewal now are parties and social movements that have substantive agendas, such as racial justice, and that improve civic life as a collateral benefit.

摘要

公民理想是审议式自我治理的理想。参与讨论自己所属群体应该做什么的人就是公民。自 20 世纪 90 年代中期以来,公民场所、机构和习惯日渐式微。20 世纪 90 年代,一场以“公民更新”为旗号的运动兴起,旨在恢复这些场所、机构和习惯。这场运动非常不具党派性,对具体问题往往保持公正,并且热衷于创造可以补充国会和选举等基本政治机构的替代环境。近年来,随着民主状况的恶化,这种方法似乎显得不够充分或不相关。目前,公民更新最有希望的来源是有实质性议程的政党和社会运动,如种族正义,并且将改善公民生活作为附带利益。

相似文献

1
Does the Civic Renewal Movement Have a Future?公民再振兴运动有未来吗?
Hastings Cent Rep. 2021 Jan;51 Suppl 1:S10-S14. doi: 10.1002/hast.1223.
2
Civic Learning for a Democracy in Crisis.危机中的民主公民学习。
Hastings Cent Rep. 2021 Jan;51 Suppl 1:S2-S4. doi: 10.1002/hast.1221.
3
Civic Competence of Youth in Europe: Measuring Cross National Variation Through the Creation of a Composite Indicator.欧洲青年的公民能力:通过构建综合指标衡量跨国差异
Soc Indic Res. 2015;123(2):431-457. doi: 10.1007/s11205-014-0746-z. Epub 2014 Sep 16.
4
Civic engagement and the transition to adulthood.公民参与与成年过渡
Future Child. 2010 Spring;20(1):159-79. doi: 10.1353/foc.0.0043.
5
Advances in civic engagement research: issues of civic measures and civic context.公民参与研究的进展:公民措施和公民背景问题。
Adv Child Dev Behav. 2011;41:273-308. doi: 10.1016/b978-0-12-386492-5.00011-7.
6
Civic Participation in Chinese Cyberpolitics: A Grounded Theory Approach of Para-Xylene Projects.公民参与中国网络政治:对二甲苯项目的扎根理论方法。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Nov 26;18(23):12458. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182312458.
7
Recommendations for Better Civic Learning: Building and Rebuilding Democracy.《更好的公民学习建议:建设和重建民主》。
Hastings Cent Rep. 2021 Jan;51 Suppl 1:S64-S75. doi: 10.1002/hast.1232.
8
Toward a Developmental Science of Politics.迈向政治发展科学。
Monogr Soc Res Child Dev. 2019 Sep;84(3):7-185. doi: 10.1111/mono.12410.
9
Where civic republicanism and deliberative democracy meet.
Hastings Cent Rep. 1996 Nov-Dec;26(6):12-4.
10
An innovative participatory method for newly democratic societies: The "civic groups forum" on national health insurance reform in Taiwan.一种创新的参与式方法适用于新兴民主社会:台湾国家健康保险改革的“公民团体论坛”。
Soc Sci Med. 2010 Mar;70(6):896-903. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2009.10.053. Epub 2009 Nov 26.