Suppr超能文献

国际疾病分类第 11 版和精神障碍诊断与统计手册第 5 版的位置,在替代性五因素人格空间中的维度特质模型。

Location of International Classification of Diseases-11th Revision and Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition, dimensional trait models in the alternative five-factor personality space.

机构信息

Lleida Institute for Biomedical Research Dr. Pifarre Foundation.

University of Almeria.

出版信息

Personal Disord. 2021 Mar;12(2):127-139. doi: 10.1037/per0000460. Epub 2020 Oct 15.

Abstract

This study explores the dimensionality (factor analysis) and the relationships (empirical networks) between the Zuckerman alternative five-factor personality model and the two current pathological dimensional personality systems based on the and the , Section III. To this end, the Zuckerman-Kuhlman-Aluja Personality Questionnaire-Short Form (ZKA-PQ/SF), the Personality Inventory for and the Personality Inventory for Form were used with 1,229 healthy community subjects: 578 men ( = 40.03, = 17.77) and 651 women ( = 39.63, = 17.81). The results show that the pathological traits of Negative Affectivity, Detachment, Disinhibition, and Antagonism/Dissociality are correlatively placed in the Neuroticism, Extraversion, Sensation Seeking, and Aggressiveness dimensional space. Psychoticism is positioned, to a lesser extent and with a similar loading, in Sensation Seeking and Neuroticism, whereas Anankastia is associated with the Activity factor. The five ZKA-PQ domains explain 42% of the variance of Personality Inventory for and 39% of the variance of Personality Inventory for Form, whereas the ZKA-PQ facets explain 47% and 44%, respectively. It is concluded that Zuckerman's alternative five-factor model of personality may be useful to better understand the position of pathological or maladaptive traits in the space of normal personality, complementarily to the five-factor model. It also helps to integrate the maladaptive personality traits of the and the Section III into a single system. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved).

摘要

本研究探讨了 Zuckerman 替代五因素人格模型与基于 DSM-III 节的和 的当前两种病理性维度人格系统之间的维度(因素分析)和关系(实证网络)。为此,使用 Zuckerman-Kuhlman-Aluja 人格问卷-短式(ZKA-PQ/SF)、 和 人格问卷 Form 对 1229 名健康社区受试者进行了测试:578 名男性( = 40.03, = 17.77)和 651 名女性( = 39.63, = 17.81)。结果表明,负性情绪、超脱、抑制和对抗/反社会等病态特征在神经质、外向性、感觉寻求和攻击性维度空间中具有相关性。精神病质在一定程度上与感觉寻求和神经质具有相似的负荷,而强迫性在活动因素中具有相关性。ZKA-PQ 的五个领域解释了 人格问卷 Form 的 42%和 人格问卷的 39%的方差,而 ZKA-PQ 方面分别解释了 47%和 44%的方差。结论是,Zuckerman 的替代五因素人格模型可能有助于更好地理解病理性或适应不良特征在正常人格空间中的位置,对五因素模型具有补充作用。它还有助于将 和 节 III 的适应不良人格特质整合到一个单一的系统中。(PsycInfo 数据库记录(c)2021 APA,保留所有权利)。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验