• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

临床医生报告的 ICD-11 人格障碍特质修饰语的结构。

Structure of clinician-reported ICD-11 personality disorder trait qualifiers.

机构信息

Center of Personality Disorder Research.

Department of Psychology.

出版信息

Psychol Assess. 2020 Jan;32(1):50-59. doi: 10.1037/pas0000747. Epub 2019 Jul 22.

DOI:10.1037/pas0000747
PMID:31328934
Abstract

The International Classification of Diseases-11th Edition (ICD-11) Classification of Personality Disorders provides the option of coding 5 trait domain qualifiers that contribute to the individual expression of personality dysfunction (i.e., Negative Affectivity, Detachment, Dissociality, Disinhibition, and Anankastia). Previous investigations of these trait domains are based on self-reported data, and so is much of the research literature from which the ICD-11 trait model has evolved. However, the ICD-11 itself involves judgments made by clinicians about their patients. Thus, it is important to examine whether the trait domains identified in self-report studies can also be obtained from clinician-reported data. A sample of 238 mental health patients were characterized by clinicians using an informant-report form of the Personality Inventory for ICD-11 (PiCD-IRF). As expected, exploratory factor analysis (EFA) indicated that clinician-reported ICD-11 trait domains could be captured by both 4- and 5-factor structures, of which the 5-factor solution seemed less conceptually sound relative to the 4-factor solution. The 4-factor model captured the unipolar domains of Negative Affectivity, Detachment, Dissociality, along with a bipolar domain of Disinhibition versus Anankastia, whereas the 5-factor model furthermore captured features of Disinhibition and Anankastia as 2 separate factors. The hierarchical structure from 1 to 5 factors partially resembled previously reported trait structures and models of psychopathology. These findings overall support the multimethod robustness of ICD-11 trait domain qualifiers and the potential for their valid ratings by mental health clinicians. The PiCD-IRF is provided in the online supplementary material - for clinical or research purposes. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved).

摘要

《国际疾病分类第 11 版(ICD-11)人格障碍分类》提供了编码 5 个特质域限定词的选项,这些限定词有助于个体人格功能障碍的表达(即负性情感、超脱、反社会、冲动和强迫)。这些特质域的先前研究基于自我报告数据,因此,ICD-11 特质模型发展所依据的大部分研究文献也是如此。然而,ICD-11 本身涉及临床医生对其患者的判断。因此,重要的是要检查自我报告研究中确定的特质域是否也可以从临床医生报告的数据中获得。对 238 名心理健康患者进行了特征描述,由临床医生使用 ICD-11 人格问卷的知情者报告表(PiCD-IRF)进行评估。正如预期的那样,探索性因素分析(EFA)表明,临床医生报告的 ICD-11 特质域可以通过 4 因子和 5 因子结构来捕捉,其中 5 因子结构相对于 4 因子结构在概念上似乎不太合理。4 因子模型捕捉到了负性情感、超脱、反社会等单极域,以及与强迫对立的双极冲动域,而 5 因子模型则进一步捕捉到了冲动和强迫的特征作为 2 个单独的因子。从 1 到 5 个因子的层次结构部分类似于先前报告的特质结构和心理病理学模型。这些发现总体上支持 ICD-11 特质域限定词的多方法稳健性及其被心理健康临床医生有效评估的潜力。PiCD-IRF 在线补充材料中提供-供临床或研究使用。(PsycINFO 数据库记录(c)2019 APA,保留所有权利)。

相似文献

1
Structure of clinician-reported ICD-11 personality disorder trait qualifiers.临床医生报告的 ICD-11 人格障碍特质修饰语的结构。
Psychol Assess. 2020 Jan;32(1):50-59. doi: 10.1037/pas0000747. Epub 2019 Jul 22.
2
The Personality Inventory for ICD-11: Investigating reliability, structural and concurrent validity, and method variance.《ICD-11 人格量表:信度、结构和同时效度以及方法偏差的研究》
Psychol Assess. 2020 Jan;32(1):8-17. doi: 10.1037/pas0000776. Epub 2019 Sep 26.
3
ICD-11 and DSM-5 personality trait domains capture categorical personality disorders: Finding a common ground.《ICD-11 和 DSM-5 人格特质领域能否涵盖类别性人格障碍:寻找共同点》
Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2018 May;52(5):425-434. doi: 10.1177/0004867417727867. Epub 2017 Aug 23.
4
Validation of Personality Inventory for DSM-5 (PID-5) algorithms to assess ICD-11 personality trait domains in a psychiatric sample.验证《精神障碍诊断与统计手册第五版人格量表》(PID-5)算法在精神科样本中评估《国际疾病分类第 11 版》人格特质领域的适用性。
Psychol Assess. 2020 Jan;32(1):40-49. doi: 10.1037/pas0000746. Epub 2019 Jun 17.
5
Assessment of the ICD-11 dimensional trait model: An introduction to the special section.评估 ICD-11 维度特质模型:特刊介绍。
Psychol Assess. 2020 Jan;32(1):1-7. doi: 10.1037/pas0000785. Epub 2019 Nov 21.
6
Alignment of the personality inventory for ICD-11 with the five-factor model of personality.与人格五因素模型的 ICD-11 人格量表的对齐。
Psychol Assess. 2022 Jul;34(7):711-716. doi: 10.1037/pas0001141. Epub 2022 May 5.
7
Personality Disorders in the ICD-11: Spanish Validation of the PiCD and the SASPD in a Mixed Community and Clinical Sample.《国际疾病分类第11版》中的人格障碍:PiCD和SASPD在混合社区与临床样本中的西班牙语验证
Assessment. 2021 Apr;28(3):759-772. doi: 10.1177/1073191120936357. Epub 2020 Jun 25.
8
Application of the ICD-11 classification of personality disorders.人格障碍 ICD-11 分类的应用。
BMC Psychiatry. 2018 Oct 29;18(1):351. doi: 10.1186/s12888-018-1908-3.
9
Deriving ICD-11 personality disorder domains from dsm-5 traits: initial attempt to harmonize two diagnostic systems.从 DSM-5 特质推导 ICD-11 人格障碍领域:协调两个诊断系统的初步尝试。
Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2017 Jul;136(1):108-117. doi: 10.1111/acps.12748. Epub 2017 May 15.
10
Six-month stability and predictive validity of the personality inventory for ICD-11.《ICD-11 人格量表的六个月稳定性和预测效度》。
BMC Psychol. 2022 Nov 16;10(1):270. doi: 10.1186/s40359-022-00979-2.

引用本文的文献

1
The validity, reliability and clinical utility of the Alternative DSM-5 Model for Personality Disorders (AMPD) according to DSM-5 revision criteria.根据《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第5版修订标准,人格障碍替代模型(AMPD)的有效性、可靠性和临床实用性。
World Psychiatry. 2025 Oct;24(3):319-340. doi: 10.1002/wps.21339.
2
The new ICD-11 diagnosis of personality disorder in forensic psychiatry.法医精神病学中人格障碍的国际疾病分类第11版新诊断标准
Front Psychiatry. 2025 Aug 19;16:1630512. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1630512. eCollection 2025.
3
Cross-walking personality disorder types to ICD-11 trait domains: An overview of current findings.
将人格障碍类型与《国际疾病分类第11版》(ICD - 11)特质领域进行交叉对照:当前研究结果概述
Front Psychiatry. 2023 Apr 6;14:1175425. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1175425. eCollection 2023.
4
Dimensional models of personality disorders: Challenges and opportunities.人格障碍的维度模型:挑战与机遇。
Front Psychiatry. 2023 Mar 7;14:1098452. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1098452. eCollection 2023.
5
Six-month stability and predictive validity of the personality inventory for ICD-11.《ICD-11 人格量表的六个月稳定性和预测效度》。
BMC Psychol. 2022 Nov 16;10(1):270. doi: 10.1186/s40359-022-00979-2.
6
Clinical Implications of ICD-11 for Diagnosing and Treating Personality Disorders.《ICD-11 对人格障碍诊断和治疗的临床意义》
Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2022 Oct;24(10):553-563. doi: 10.1007/s11920-022-01364-x. Epub 2022 Aug 24.
7
Maladaptive personality traits may link childhood trauma history to current internalizing symptoms.适应不良的人格特质可能会将童年创伤史与当前的内化症状联系起来。
Scand J Psychol. 2022 Oct;63(5):468-475. doi: 10.1111/sjop.12830. Epub 2022 May 23.
8
Editorial: Entering the Brave New World of ICD-11 Personality Disorder Diagnosis.社论:踏入国际疾病分类第11版人格障碍诊断的全新世界。
Front Psychiatry. 2021 Nov 17;12:793133. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.793133. eCollection 2021.
9
Anankastia or Psychoticism? Which One Is Better Suited for the Fifth Trait in the Pathological Big Five: Insight From the Circumplex of Personality Metatraits Perspective.强迫性还是精神病性?哪一个更适合病理性大五人格中的第五个特质:来自人格元特质环性模型视角的见解
Front Psychiatry. 2021 Oct 14;12:648386. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.648386. eCollection 2021.
10
Preliminary Scales for Personality Disorder: Self and Interpersonal Dysfunction Plus Five Personality Disorder Trait Domains.人格障碍初步量表:自我与人际功能障碍加五个人格障碍特质领域
Front Psychol. 2021 Jul 12;12:668724. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.668724. eCollection 2021.