Center of Personality Disorder Research.
Department of Psychology.
Psychol Assess. 2020 Jan;32(1):50-59. doi: 10.1037/pas0000747. Epub 2019 Jul 22.
The International Classification of Diseases-11th Edition (ICD-11) Classification of Personality Disorders provides the option of coding 5 trait domain qualifiers that contribute to the individual expression of personality dysfunction (i.e., Negative Affectivity, Detachment, Dissociality, Disinhibition, and Anankastia). Previous investigations of these trait domains are based on self-reported data, and so is much of the research literature from which the ICD-11 trait model has evolved. However, the ICD-11 itself involves judgments made by clinicians about their patients. Thus, it is important to examine whether the trait domains identified in self-report studies can also be obtained from clinician-reported data. A sample of 238 mental health patients were characterized by clinicians using an informant-report form of the Personality Inventory for ICD-11 (PiCD-IRF). As expected, exploratory factor analysis (EFA) indicated that clinician-reported ICD-11 trait domains could be captured by both 4- and 5-factor structures, of which the 5-factor solution seemed less conceptually sound relative to the 4-factor solution. The 4-factor model captured the unipolar domains of Negative Affectivity, Detachment, Dissociality, along with a bipolar domain of Disinhibition versus Anankastia, whereas the 5-factor model furthermore captured features of Disinhibition and Anankastia as 2 separate factors. The hierarchical structure from 1 to 5 factors partially resembled previously reported trait structures and models of psychopathology. These findings overall support the multimethod robustness of ICD-11 trait domain qualifiers and the potential for their valid ratings by mental health clinicians. The PiCD-IRF is provided in the online supplementary material - for clinical or research purposes. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved).
《国际疾病分类第 11 版(ICD-11)人格障碍分类》提供了编码 5 个特质域限定词的选项,这些限定词有助于个体人格功能障碍的表达(即负性情感、超脱、反社会、冲动和强迫)。这些特质域的先前研究基于自我报告数据,因此,ICD-11 特质模型发展所依据的大部分研究文献也是如此。然而,ICD-11 本身涉及临床医生对其患者的判断。因此,重要的是要检查自我报告研究中确定的特质域是否也可以从临床医生报告的数据中获得。对 238 名心理健康患者进行了特征描述,由临床医生使用 ICD-11 人格问卷的知情者报告表(PiCD-IRF)进行评估。正如预期的那样,探索性因素分析(EFA)表明,临床医生报告的 ICD-11 特质域可以通过 4 因子和 5 因子结构来捕捉,其中 5 因子结构相对于 4 因子结构在概念上似乎不太合理。4 因子模型捕捉到了负性情感、超脱、反社会等单极域,以及与强迫对立的双极冲动域,而 5 因子模型则进一步捕捉到了冲动和强迫的特征作为 2 个单独的因子。从 1 到 5 个因子的层次结构部分类似于先前报告的特质结构和心理病理学模型。这些发现总体上支持 ICD-11 特质域限定词的多方法稳健性及其被心理健康临床医生有效评估的潜力。PiCD-IRF 在线补充材料中提供-供临床或研究使用。(PsycINFO 数据库记录(c)2019 APA,保留所有权利)。