Peos Jackson J, Helms Eric R, Fournier Paul A, Krieger James, Sainsbury Amanda
Faculty of Science, School of Human Sciences (Exercise and Sports Science), The University of Western Australia, Crawley, Western Australia, Australia.
Sports Performance Institute New Zealand (SPRINZ), Auckland University of Technology, Auckland, New Zealand.
PLoS One. 2021 Feb 25;16(2):e0247292. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0247292. eCollection 2021.
Athletes undergoing energy restriction for weight/fat reduction sometimes apply 'diet breaks' involving increased energy intake, but there is little empirical evidence of effects on outcomes. Twenty-six resistance-trained athletes (11/26 or 42% female) who had completed 12 weeks of intermittent energy restriction participated in this study. Participants had a mean (SD) age of 29.3 (6.4) years, a weight of 72.7 (15.9) kg, and a body fat percentage of 21.3 (7.5) %. During the 1-week diet break, energy intake was increased (by means of increased carbohydrate intake) to predicted weight maintenance requirements. While the 1-week diet break had no significant effect on fat mass, it led to small but significant increases in mean body weight (0.6 kg, P<0.001), fat-free mass (0.7 kg, P<0.001) and in resting energy expenditure, from a mean (and 95% confidence interval) of 7000 (6420 to 7580) kJ/day to 7200 (6620 to 7780) kJ/day (P = 0.026). Overall, muscle endurance in the legs (but not arms) improved after the diet break, including significant increases in the work completed by the quadriceps and hamstrings in a maximum-effort 25-repetition set, with values increasing from 2530 (2170 to 2890) J to 2660 (2310 to 3010) J (P = 0.018) and from 1280 (1130 to 1430) J to 1380 (1220 to 1540) J (P = 0.018) following the diet break, respectively. However, muscle strength did not change. Participants reported significantly lower sensations of hunger (P = 0.017), prospective consumption (P = 0.020) and irritability (P = 0.041) after the diet break, and significantly higher sensations of fullness (P = 0.002), satisfaction (P = 0.002), and alertness (P = 0.003). In summary, a 1-week diet break improved muscle endurance in the legs and increased mental alertness, and reduced appetite and irritability. With this considered, it may be wise for athletes to coordinate diet breaks with training sessions that require muscle endurance of the legs and/or mental focus, as well as in the latter parts of a weight loss phase when increases in appetite might threaten dietary adherence. Trial registration: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry Reference Number: ACTRN12618000638235 anzctr.org.au.
为减轻体重/减少脂肪而进行能量限制的运动员有时会采用“饮食中断”的方法,即增加能量摄入,但关于其对结果影响的实证证据很少。26名完成了12周间歇性能量限制的抗阻训练运动员(11名女性,占26名运动员的42%)参与了本研究。参与者的平均(标准差)年龄为29.3(6.4)岁,体重为72.7(15.9)千克,体脂率为21.3(7.5)%。在为期1周的饮食中断期间,通过增加碳水化合物摄入量,将能量摄入提高到预测的体重维持需求量。虽然为期1周的饮食中断对脂肪量没有显著影响,但导致平均体重小幅但显著增加(0.6千克,P<0.001),去脂体重增加(0.7千克,P<0.001),静息能量消耗也增加,从平均(及95%置信区间)7000(6420至7580)千焦/天增加到7200(6620至7780)千焦/天(P = 0.026)。总体而言,饮食中断后腿部(而非手臂)的肌肉耐力有所改善,包括在最大努力进行的25次重复训练中,股四头肌和腘绳肌完成的工作量显著增加,饮食中断后,股四头肌的值从2530(2170至2890)焦耳增加到2660(2310至3010)焦耳(P = 0.018),腘绳肌的值从1280(1130至1430)焦耳增加到1380(1220至1540)焦耳(P = 0.018)。然而,肌肉力量没有变化。参与者报告称,饮食中断后饥饿感(P = 0.017)、预期进食量(P = 0.020)和易怒情绪(P = 0.041)显著降低,饱腹感(P = 0.002)、满意度(P = 0.002)和警觉性(P = 0.003)显著提高。总之,为期1周的饮食中断改善了腿部肌肉耐力,提高了精神警觉性,减少了食欲和易怒情绪。考虑到这一点,运动员在安排饮食中断时,或许明智的做法是与需要腿部肌肉耐力和/或精神专注力的训练课程相协调,以及在减肥阶段后期进行,因为此时食欲增加可能会威胁到饮食依从性。试验注册:澳大利亚新西兰临床试验注册中心参考编号:ACTRN12618000638235 anzctr.org.au 。