WorldPop, School of Geography and Environmental Science, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom.
PLoS One. 2021 Feb 25;16(2):e0247535. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0247535. eCollection 2021.
Spatial datasets of building footprint polygons are becoming more widely available and accessible for many areas in the world. These datasets are important inputs for a range of different analyses, such as understanding the development of cities, identifying areas at risk of disasters, and mapping the distribution of populations. The growth of high spatial resolution imagery and computing power is enabling automated procedures to extract and map building footprints for whole countries. These advances are enabling coverage of building footprint datasets for low and middle income countries which might lack other data on urban land uses. While spatially detailed, many building footprints lack information on structure type, local zoning, or land use, limiting their application. However, morphology metrics can be used to describe characteristics of size, shape, spacing, orientation and patterns of the structures and extract additional information which can be correlated with different structure and settlement types or neighbourhoods. We introduce the foot package, a new set of open-source tools in a flexible R package for calculating morphology metrics for building footprints and summarising them in different spatial scales and spatial representations. In particular our tools can create gridded (or raster) representations of morphology summary metrics which have not been widely supported previously. We demonstrate the tools by creating gridded morphology metrics from all building footprints in England, Scotland and Wales, and then use those layers in an unsupervised cluster analysis to derive a pattern-based settlement typology. We compare our mapped settlement types with two existing settlement classifications. The results suggest that building patterns can help distinguish different urban and rural types. However, intra-urban differences were not well-predicted by building morphology alone. More broadly, though, this case study demonstrates the potential of mapping settlement patterns in the absence of a housing census or other urban planning data.
建筑物轮廓多边形的空间数据集在世界上许多地区变得越来越广泛可用和可访问。这些数据集是各种不同分析的重要输入,例如了解城市的发展、识别易受灾地区以及绘制人口分布。高空间分辨率图像和计算能力的增长使自动提取和绘制整个国家的建筑物轮廓成为可能。这些进展使低和中等收入国家能够覆盖建筑物轮廓数据集,而这些国家可能缺乏其他城市土地利用数据。虽然空间上详细,但许多建筑物轮廓缺乏关于结构类型、当地分区或土地利用的信息,从而限制了它们的应用。但是,形态学指标可以用于描述结构的大小、形状、间距、方向和模式的特征,并提取可以与不同结构和定居类型或社区相关联的其他信息。我们引入了 foot 软件包,这是一个灵活的 R 软件包中的一组新的开源工具,用于计算建筑物轮廓的形态学指标,并在不同的空间尺度和空间表示形式中对其进行总结。特别是,我们的工具可以创建以前未广泛支持的形态学摘要指标的网格化(或光栅)表示形式。我们通过从英格兰、苏格兰和威尔士的所有建筑物轮廓创建网格化形态学指标来演示这些工具,然后使用这些图层在无监督聚类分析中得出基于模式的定居类型学。我们将我们绘制的定居类型与两种现有的定居分类进行比较。结果表明,建筑物模式有助于区分不同的城市和农村类型。然而,仅通过建筑物形态学本身并不能很好地预测城市内部的差异。更广泛地说,尽管如此,这项案例研究表明了在没有住房普查或其他城市规划数据的情况下绘制定居模式的潜力。