Paling M R, Abbitt P L, Mugler J P, Brookeman J R
Department of Radiology, University of Virginia Medical Center, Charlottesville 22908.
Radiology. 1988 Jun;167(3):695-9. doi: 10.1148/radiology.167.3.3363125.
Twenty patients with known liver metastases were examined with magnetic resonance imaging; four different pulse sequences were used and six different images were produced to allow comparison of pulse sequence performance at a 1.0-T field strength. Pulse sequence performance was in each case calculated by measuring contrast-to-noise ratios (C/N) comparing normal liver, metastatic tumors to liver, and background noise. All pulse sequences required approximately the same length of time for data acquisition. Short inversion time inversion-recovery (STIR) sequences yielded the greatest signal difference-to-noise ratio in 17 patients. Phase contrast images produced the greatest contrast ratio in three patients. Although short TR, short TE spin-echo sequences provided the best anatomic detail, in no patient did this sequence yield the greatest signal difference-to-noise ratio in the comparison of liver and tumor. Differences in field strength and in equipment software and hardware may account for the discrepancy between our findings and previously published data.
对20例已知有肝转移的患者进行了磁共振成像检查;使用了四种不同的脉冲序列,并生成了六幅不同的图像,以便在1.0-T场强下比较脉冲序列的性能。每种情况下,通过测量正常肝脏、肝脏转移瘤与背景噪声之间的对比噪声比(C/N)来计算脉冲序列的性能。所有脉冲序列的数据采集所需时间大致相同。短反转时间反转恢复(STIR)序列在17例患者中产生了最大的信号差异噪声比。相位对比图像在3例患者中产生了最大的对比率。尽管短TR、短TE自旋回波序列提供了最佳的解剖细节,但在肝脏与肿瘤的比较中,该序列在任何患者中都未产生最大的信号差异噪声比。场强以及设备软件和硬件的差异可能是我们的研究结果与先前发表的数据之间存在差异的原因。