• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

生物制剂单药和联合治疗 Stevens-Johnson 综合征和中毒性表皮坏死松解症的疗效和安全性的系统评价。

A Systematic Review of Efficacy and Safety of Monotherapy and Combination Therapy With Biologic for Stevens-Johnson Syndrome and Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis.

机构信息

7938 University of Toronto, Faculty of Medicine, Toronto, Ontario.

8166 Department of Dermatology and Skin Science, University of British Columbia; Division of Dermatology, St. Paul's Hospital, Vancouver, British Columbia.

出版信息

J Cutan Med Surg. 2021 Nov-Dec;25(6):598-615. doi: 10.1177/1203475421993779. Epub 2021 Feb 25.

DOI:10.1177/1203475421993779
PMID:33631950
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Biologic drugs have the potential to halt the progression of Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS) and toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN) by decreasing concentrations of tumor necrosis factor-α, a cytokine implicated in epithelial cell death. The objective of this systematic review is to investigate the efficacy and safety of biologic monotherapy and combination therapy for SJS/TEN.

METHODS

MEDLINE and EMBASE in OVID were searched on October 28, 2020. Inclusion criteria were original studies containing human participants diagnosed with SJS/TEN and treated with biologics. Studies were excluded if they were literature reviews, systematic reviews, letters to the editor, or conference abstracts.

RESULTS

The 38 articles reviewed included 27 (71.1%) case reports, 6 (15.8%) case series, 3 (7.9%) retrospective reviews, and 2 (5.3%) RCTs. The age range of the included studies was 2 to 85 years, the mean age was 46.4 years. The mean body surface (BSA) across the 38 included articles was 31.0%. The average actual mortality reported within the 38 included articles was 9.2%. Both biologic monotherapy and combination therapy were associated with improved outcomes in SJS/TEN. Furthermore, anti TNF-alpha therapy, specifically etanercept, showed improved outcomes as monotherapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, reviewed studies presented a strong case for biologic treatment, both monotherapy and combination use, in SJS/TEN treatment. Based on the number of fatal adverse events observed, biologic monotherapy may be safer compared to combination therapy. Further research with a larger sample size and a randomized control trial design is required.

摘要

背景

生物制剂通过降低细胞因子肿瘤坏死因子-α的浓度,有可能阻止史蒂文斯-约翰逊综合征(SJS)和中毒性表皮坏死松解症(TEN)的进展,这种细胞因子与上皮细胞死亡有关。本系统评价的目的是研究生物单药治疗和联合治疗 SJS/TEN 的疗效和安全性。

方法

于 2020 年 10 月 28 日在 OVID 的 MEDLINE 和 EMBASE 中进行检索。纳入标准为包含人类 SJS/TEN 患者并接受生物制剂治疗的原始研究。如果研究为文献综述、系统评价、给编辑的信或会议摘要,则将其排除在外。

结果

综述的 38 篇文章包括 27 篇(71.1%)病例报告、6 篇(15.8%)病例系列、3 篇(7.9%)回顾性研究和 2 篇(5.3%)RCT。纳入研究的年龄范围为 2 至 85 岁,平均年龄为 46.4 岁。纳入的 38 篇文章中平均体表面积(BSA)为 31.0%。纳入的 38 篇文章中报告的平均实际死亡率为 9.2%。生物单药治疗和联合治疗均与 SJS/TEN 结局的改善相关。此外,抗 TNF-α 治疗,特别是依那西普,作为单药治疗显示出更好的结局。

结论

总体而言,回顾性研究强烈支持生物治疗,包括单药和联合使用,用于 SJS/TEN 的治疗。基于观察到的致死性不良事件数量,生物单药治疗可能比联合治疗更安全。需要进一步开展具有更大样本量和随机对照试验设计的研究。

相似文献

1
A Systematic Review of Efficacy and Safety of Monotherapy and Combination Therapy With Biologic for Stevens-Johnson Syndrome and Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis.生物制剂单药和联合治疗 Stevens-Johnson 综合征和中毒性表皮坏死松解症的疗效和安全性的系统评价。
J Cutan Med Surg. 2021 Nov-Dec;25(6):598-615. doi: 10.1177/1203475421993779. Epub 2021 Feb 25.
2
Biologic TNF-alpha inhibitors in the treatment of Stevens-Johnson syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis: a systemic review.生物制剂 TNF-α 抑制剂治疗 Stevens-Johnson 综合征和中毒性表皮坏死松解症:系统评价。
J Dermatolog Treat. 2020 Feb;31(1):66-73. doi: 10.1080/09546634.2019.1577548. Epub 2019 Feb 19.
3
Evaluation of Combination Therapy With Etanercept and Systemic Corticosteroids for Stevens-Johnson Syndrome and Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis: A Multicenter Observational Study.评价依那西普联合全身皮质类固醇治疗史蒂文斯-约翰逊综合征和中毒性表皮坏死松解症的疗效:一项多中心观察性研究。
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2022 May;10(5):1295-1304.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2022.01.038. Epub 2022 Feb 4.
4
Stevens-Johnson Syndrome/Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis and Treatment With a Biologic: A Case Report.史蒂文斯-约翰逊综合征/中毒性表皮坏死松解症及生物制剂治疗:一例报告
Perm J. 2017;21:16-060. doi: 10.7812/TPP/16-060.
5
Biologic TNF-α Inhibitors for Stevens-Johnson Syndrome, Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis, and TEN-SJS Overlap: A Study-Level and Patient-Level Meta-Analysis.用于史蒂文斯-约翰逊综合征、中毒性表皮坏死松解症及中毒性表皮坏死松解症-史蒂文斯-约翰逊综合征重叠综合征的生物肿瘤坏死因子-α抑制剂:一项研究水平和患者水平的荟萃分析
Dermatol Ther (Heidelb). 2023 Jun;13(6):1305-1327. doi: 10.1007/s13555-023-00928-w. Epub 2023 May 13.
6
Stevens-Johnson syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis associated with immune checkpoint inhibitors: a systematic review.史蒂文斯-约翰逊综合征和中毒性表皮坏死松解症与免疫检查点抑制剂相关:系统评价。
Front Immunol. 2024 Jul 12;15:1414136. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1414136. eCollection 2024.
7
Tumor necrosis factor inhibitors enhance corticosteroid therapy for Stevens-Johnson syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis linked to immune checkpoint inhibitors: a prospective study.肿瘤坏死因子抑制剂增强与免疫检查点抑制剂相关的史蒂文斯-约翰逊综合征和中毒性表皮坏死松解症的皮质类固醇治疗:一项前瞻性研究。
Front Immunol. 2024 Aug 7;15:1421684. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1421684. eCollection 2024.
8
Rapid remission of Stevens-Johnson syndrome by combination therapy using etanercept and intravenous immunoglobulin and a review of the literature.采用依那西普联合静脉注射免疫球蛋白治疗史蒂文斯-约翰逊综合征快速缓解:文献复习
Dermatol Ther. 2019 Jul;32(4):e12832. doi: 10.1111/dth.12832. Epub 2019 Feb 21.
9
Stevens-Johnson Syndrome and Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis: A Concise Review with a Comprehensive Summary of Therapeutic Interventions Emphasizing Supportive Measures.史蒂文斯-约翰逊综合征和中毒性表皮坏死松解症:一篇简要综述,全面总结治疗干预措施,重点强调支持性措施
Adv Ther. 2017 Jun;34(6):1235-1244. doi: 10.1007/s12325-017-0530-y. Epub 2017 Apr 24.
10
Corticosteroids in Stevens-Johnson Syndrome/toxic epidermal necrolysis: current evidence and implications for future research.史蒂文斯-约翰逊综合征/中毒性表皮坏死松解症中的皮质类固醇:当前证据及对未来研究的启示
Ann Pharmacother. 2015 Mar;49(3):335-42. doi: 10.1177/1060028014560012. Epub 2014 Nov 18.

引用本文的文献

1
The case for etanercept in the management of toxic epidermal necrolysis.依那西普在中毒性表皮坏死松解症治疗中的应用依据
Skin Health Dis. 2025 May 28;5(4):247-255. doi: 10.1093/skinhd/vzaf012. eCollection 2025 Aug.
2
Latin American guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of Stevens-Johnson syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis.拉丁美洲史蒂文斯-约翰逊综合征和中毒性表皮坏死松解症诊断与治疗指南。
World Allergy Organ J. 2025 Mar 26;18(4):101046. doi: 10.1016/j.waojou.2025.101046. eCollection 2025 Apr.
3
Tumor necrosis factor inhibitors enhance corticosteroid therapy for Stevens-Johnson syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis linked to immune checkpoint inhibitors: a prospective study.
肿瘤坏死因子抑制剂增强与免疫检查点抑制剂相关的史蒂文斯-约翰逊综合征和中毒性表皮坏死松解症的皮质类固醇治疗:一项前瞻性研究。
Front Immunol. 2024 Aug 7;15:1421684. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1421684. eCollection 2024.
4
Paradoxical and bimodal immune-mediated dermatological side effects of TNF-α inhibitors: A comprehensive review.肿瘤坏死因子-α抑制剂矛盾性和双峰性免疫介导的皮肤副作用:一项综述
Skin Res Technol. 2024 May;30(5):e13718. doi: 10.1111/srt.13718.
5
Targeted therapy for immune mediated skin diseases. What should a dermatologist know?靶向治疗免疫介导性皮肤病。皮肤科医生应该知道什么?
An Bras Dermatol. 2024 Jul-Aug;99(4):546-567. doi: 10.1016/j.abd.2023.10.002. Epub 2024 Mar 22.
6
Tumor necrosis factor-α inhibitor for successful treatment of toxic epidermal necrolysis with severe infection: a case series.肿瘤坏死因子-α抑制剂成功治疗合并严重感染的中毒性表皮坏死松解症:病例系列研究。
J Int Med Res. 2024 Jan;52(1):3000605231223059. doi: 10.1177/03000605231223059.
7
Biologic TNF-α Inhibitors for Stevens-Johnson Syndrome, Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis, and TEN-SJS Overlap: A Study-Level and Patient-Level Meta-Analysis.用于史蒂文斯-约翰逊综合征、中毒性表皮坏死松解症及中毒性表皮坏死松解症-史蒂文斯-约翰逊综合征重叠综合征的生物肿瘤坏死因子-α抑制剂:一项研究水平和患者水平的荟萃分析
Dermatol Ther (Heidelb). 2023 Jun;13(6):1305-1327. doi: 10.1007/s13555-023-00928-w. Epub 2023 May 13.
8
A Review of the Systemic Treatment of Stevens-Johnson Syndrome and Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis.史蒂文斯-约翰逊综合征和中毒性表皮坏死松解症的全身治疗综述
Biomedicines. 2022 Aug 28;10(9):2105. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines10092105.