• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Healthy eating: a matter of prioritisation by households or policymakers?健康饮食:家庭还是政策制定者的优先事项?
Public Health Nutr. 2021 May;24(7):1851-1853. doi: 10.1017/S1368980021000677. Epub 2021 Feb 26.
2
Differences in Perceptions of the Food Environment Between African American Men Who Did and Did Not Consume Recommended Levels of Fruits and Vegetables.食用水果和蔬菜达到推荐量与未达到推荐量的非裔美国男性对食物环境认知的差异。
Health Educ Behav. 2016 Dec;43(6):648-655. doi: 10.1177/1090198115626923. Epub 2016 Mar 1.
3
The more that households prioritise healthy eating, the better they can afford to consume a sufficient quantity and variety of fruits and vegetables.家庭越重视健康饮食,就越能负担得起消费足够数量和种类的水果和蔬菜。
Public Health Nutr. 2021 May;24(7):1841-1850. doi: 10.1017/S1368980020004929. Epub 2020 Dec 15.
4
Gaps between fruit and vegetable production, demand, and recommended consumption at global and national levels: an integrated modelling study.全球和国家层面水果和蔬菜生产、需求和推荐摄入量之间的差距:综合建模研究。
Lancet Planet Health. 2019 Jul;3(7):e318-e329. doi: 10.1016/S2542-5196(19)30095-6.
5
Barriers to Fresh Fruit and Vegetable Access in Adult Patients in the Mayo-La Crosse Family Medicine Residency Clinic.梅奥-拉克罗斯家庭医学住院医师诊所成年患者获取新鲜水果和蔬菜的障碍
Cureus. 2024 Jun 25;16(6):e63114. doi: 10.7759/cureus.63114. eCollection 2024 Jun.
6
Availability of, access to and consumption of fruits and vegetables in a peri-urban area in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa.南非夸祖鲁-纳塔尔省一个城郊地区水果和蔬菜的供应、获取和消费情况。
Matern Child Nutr. 2013 Jul;9(3):409-24. doi: 10.1111/j.1740-8709.2011.00372.x. Epub 2011 Dec 20.
7
Financial Incentives Increase Purchases Of Fruit And Vegetables Among Lower-Income Households With Children.经济激励措施增加了有孩子的低收入家庭购买水果和蔬菜的数量。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2019 Sep;38(9):1557-1566. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2018.05420.
8
Diet Quality and Fruit, Vegetable, and Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Consumption by Household Food Insecurity among 8- to 12-Year-Old Children during Summer Months.8 至 12 岁儿童在夏季家庭食物不安全与饮食质量及水果、蔬菜和含糖饮料消费的关系
J Acad Nutr Diet. 2019 Oct;119(10):1695-1702. doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2019.03.004. Epub 2019 May 2.
9
Fruit and vegetable consumption across population segments: evidence from a national household survey.不同人群的水果和蔬菜消费情况:来自全国住户调查的证据。
J Health Popul Nutr. 2023 Jun 8;42(1):54. doi: 10.1186/s41043-023-00382-6.
10
Patterns of sociodemographic and food practice characteristics in relation to fruit and vegetable consumption in children: results from the U.K. National Diet and Nutrition Survey Rolling Programme (2008-2010).儿童蔬果消费与社会人口学及饮食行为特征模式:英国国家饮食与营养调查滚动项目(2008-2010 年)的结果。
Public Health Nutr. 2013 Nov;16(11):1912-23. doi: 10.1017/S1368980013001912. Epub 2013 Aug 7.

引用本文的文献

1
The Supply of Calories, Proteins, and Fats in Low-Income Countries: A Four-Decade Retrospective Study.低收入国家的卡路里、蛋白质和脂肪供应:四十年回顾研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jul 9;18(14):7356. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18147356.

本文引用的文献

1
Ultraprocessed food and chronic noncommunicable diseases: A systematic review and meta-analysis of 43 observational studies.超加工食品与慢性非传染性疾病:43 项观察性研究的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Obes Rev. 2021 Mar;22(3):e13146. doi: 10.1111/obr.13146. Epub 2020 Nov 9.
2
The effects of nudges on purchases, food choice, and energy intake or content of purchases in real-life food purchasing environments: a systematic review and evidence synthesis.在现实生活中的食品购买环境中,推动对购买、食品选择以及购买的能量摄入或内容的影响:系统评价和证据综合。
Nutr J. 2020 Sep 17;19(1):103. doi: 10.1186/s12937-020-00623-y.
3
Dark Nudges and Sludge in Big Alcohol: Behavioral Economics, Cognitive Biases, and Alcohol Industry Corporate Social Responsibility.大型酒精饮料行业中的隐性劝诱与阻碍:行为经济学、认知偏差与酒精行业企业社会责任
Milbank Q. 2020 Dec;98(4):1290-1328. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12475. Epub 2020 Sep 15.
4
To what extent do dietary costs explain socio-economic differences in dietary behavior?饮食成本在多大程度上解释了饮食行为的社会经济差异?
Nutr J. 2020 Aug 24;19(1):88. doi: 10.1186/s12937-020-00608-x.
5
What role should the commercial food system play in promoting health through better diet?商业食品系统在通过改善饮食促进健康方面应发挥什么作用?
BMJ. 2020 Mar 17;368:m545. doi: 10.1136/bmj.m545.
6
Systematic review: a systems innovation perspective on barriers and facilitators for the implementation of healthy food-store interventions.系统评价:从系统创新视角看健康食品店干预措施实施的障碍和促进因素。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2019 Nov 21;16(1):108. doi: 10.1186/s12966-019-0867-5.
7
Health effects of dietary risks in 195 countries, 1990-2017: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017.195 个国家 1990 年至 2017 年饮食风险对健康的影响:2017 年全球疾病负担研究的系统分析。
Lancet. 2019 May 11;393(10184):1958-1972. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)30041-8. Epub 2019 Apr 4.
8
Yes We Can: Eating Healthy on a Limited Budget.是的,我们能做到:在预算有限的情况下保持健康饮食。
J Nutr Educ Behav. 2019 Mar;51(3):268-276. doi: 10.1016/j.jneb.2018.12.002.
9
The Global Syndemic of Obesity, Undernutrition, and Climate Change: The Lancet Commission report.肥胖、营养不良与气候变化的全球综合征:《柳叶刀》委员会报告
Lancet. 2019 Feb 23;393(10173):791-846. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32822-8. Epub 2019 Jan 27.
10
Trends and Disparities in Diet Quality Among US Adults by Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program Participation Status.美国成年人的膳食质量趋势和差异,按补充营养援助计划参与状况划分。
JAMA Netw Open. 2018 Jun;1(2):e180237. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.0237.

健康饮食:家庭还是政策制定者的优先事项?

Healthy eating: a matter of prioritisation by households or policymakers?

机构信息

Department of Epidemiology and Data Science, Amsterdam UMC-Vrije Universiteit, De Boelelaan 1089a, 1081HVAmsterdam, The Netherlands.

Upstream Team, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands Email:

出版信息

Public Health Nutr. 2021 May;24(7):1851-1853. doi: 10.1017/S1368980021000677. Epub 2021 Feb 26.

DOI:10.1017/S1368980021000677
PMID:33632356
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8094431/
Abstract

I reflect upon the potential reasons why American low-income households do not spend an optimal proportion of their food budgets on fruits and vegetables, even though this would allow them to meet the recommended levels of fruit and vegetable consumption. Other priorities than health, automatic decision-making processes and access to healthy foods play a role, but solutions for the persistent socio-economic inequalities in diet should be sought in the wider food system which promotes cheap, mass-produced foods. I argue that, ultimately, healthy eating is not a matter of prioritisation by individual households but by policymakers.

摘要

我思考了为什么美国低收入家庭即使知道多吃水果和蔬菜有益于健康,也没有将食品预算的最优部分用于购买水果和蔬菜,从而达到推荐的水果和蔬菜摄入量。除了健康,其他优先事项、自动决策过程和获取健康食品的机会都会产生影响,但应该在更广泛的促进廉价、大规模生产食品的食品体系中寻求解决饮食方面持续存在的社会经济不平等问题的办法。我认为,归根结底,健康饮食不是家庭的优先事项,而是政策制定者的优先事项。