• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

家庭越重视健康饮食,就越能负担得起消费足够数量和种类的水果和蔬菜。

The more that households prioritise healthy eating, the better they can afford to consume a sufficient quantity and variety of fruits and vegetables.

机构信息

Economic Research Service, USDA, 805 Pennsylvania Avenue, Kansas City, MO64105, USA.

出版信息

Public Health Nutr. 2021 May;24(7):1841-1850. doi: 10.1017/S1368980020004929. Epub 2020 Dec 15.

DOI:10.1017/S1368980020004929
PMID:33317652
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10195601/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To examine the variety of fruits and vegetables lower income households in the USA can buy while meeting Federal dietary recommendations at different levels of expenditure.

DESIGN

Simulation techniques were used to create 3000 market baskets of fruits and vegetables. All baskets contained enough food for a four-person household to meet dietary recommendations for fruits and vegetables over 1 week. Each basket's retail value was estimated along with the ability of a representative household to afford each basket with different levels of expenditure.

SETTING

We used data from the US Department of Agriculture's (USDA) Fruit and Vegetable Prices data product which reports a US household's costs to buy each of 157 different fruit and vegetable products per edible cup equivalent.

PARTICIPANTS

We consider the situation facing a lower income household that receives maximum benefits through the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP). These benefits are enough for the household to obtain a nutritious and palatable diet without spending any of its own money on food if it approximately follows USDA's Thrifty Food Plan.

RESULTS

Households receiving maximum SNAP benefits can buy a sufficient variety and quantity of fruits and vegetables if they allocate about 40 % of those benefits to these two food groups. However, if households spend less than that amount, the variety of products they can buy while still satisfying recommendations drops off quickly.

CONCLUSION

Households that move fruits and vegetables to the centre of their budgets can better afford to meet Federal dietary guidelines.

摘要

目的

考察美国低收入家庭在不同支出水平下,为满足联邦饮食建议,所能购买的水果和蔬菜种类。

设计

采用模拟技术创建 3000 种水果和蔬菜的购物篮。所有购物篮都包含足够的食物,供四口之家在一周内满足水果和蔬菜的饮食建议。根据不同的支出水平,估计了每个篮子的零售价值以及代表性家庭购买每个篮子的能力。

设置

我们使用了美国农业部(USDA)水果和蔬菜价格数据产品的数据,该产品报告了美国家庭购买 157 种不同水果和蔬菜产品每种可食用杯当量的成本。

参与者

我们考虑了接受补充营养援助计划(SNAP)最大福利的低收入家庭的情况。如果该家庭大致遵循美国农业部的节俭食品计划,这些福利足以让其在不花自己一分钱购买食物的情况下,获得营养丰富且美味的饮食。

结果

如果接受 SNAP 最大福利的家庭将大约 40%的福利分配给这两个食品组,他们可以购买足够的水果和蔬菜种类和数量。然而,如果家庭支出低于这个数额,那么他们在满足建议的同时,可购买的产品种类会迅速减少。

结论

将水果和蔬菜放在预算中心的家庭可以更好地负担满足联邦饮食指南的费用。

相似文献

1
The more that households prioritise healthy eating, the better they can afford to consume a sufficient quantity and variety of fruits and vegetables.家庭越重视健康饮食,就越能负担得起消费足够数量和种类的水果和蔬菜。
Public Health Nutr. 2021 May;24(7):1841-1850. doi: 10.1017/S1368980020004929. Epub 2020 Dec 15.
2
U.S. Fruit and Vegetable Affordability on the Thrifty Food Plan Depends on Purchasing Power and Safety Net Supports.美国在节俭食品计划下水果和蔬菜的可负担性取决于购买力和安全网支持。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Feb 27;19(5):2772. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19052772.
3
Fruit and Vegetable Purchasing Patterns and Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program Participation: Findings From a Nationally Representative Survey.水果和蔬菜购买模式与补充营养援助计划参与情况:一项全国代表性调查的结果。
J Acad Nutr Diet. 2020 Oct;120(10):1633-1642. doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2020.05.016. Epub 2020 Jul 29.
4
Can low-income Americans afford to satisfy MyPyramid fruit and vegetable guidelines?美国低收入人群能否负担得起满足“我的金字塔”水果和蔬菜指南的要求?
J Nutr Educ Behav. 2011 May-Jun;43(3):173-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jneb.2010.08.011.
5
The Affordability of MyPlate: An Analysis of SNAP Benefits and the Actual Cost of Eating According to the Dietary Guidelines.“我的餐盘”计划的可承受性:根据膳食指南对补充营养援助计划福利与饮食实际成本的分析
J Nutr Educ Behav. 2017 Sep;49(8):623-631.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jneb.2017.06.005.
6
Financial incentives increase fruit and vegetable intake among Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program participants: a randomized controlled trial of the USDA Healthy Incentives Pilot.经济激励措施可增加补充营养援助计划参与者的果蔬摄入量:美国农业部健康激励试点项目的一项随机对照试验
Am J Clin Nutr. 2016 Aug;104(2):423-35. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.115.129320. Epub 2016 Jun 22.
7
Is price a barrier to eating more fruits and vegetables for low-income families?价格是否会成为低收入家庭增加水果和蔬菜摄入量的障碍?
J Am Diet Assoc. 2007 Nov;107(11):1909-15. doi: 10.1016/j.jada.2007.08.015. Epub 2007 Oct 18.
8
Association of Funding and Meal Preparation Time With Nutritional Quality of Meals of Supplemental Nutritional Assistance Program Recipients.资金来源和备餐时间与补充营养援助计划受助人膳食营养质量的关联。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Jun 1;4(6):e2114701. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.14701.
9
Nationwide expansion of a financial incentive program on fruit and vegetable purchases among Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program participants: A cost-effectiveness analysis.全国范围内针对补充营养援助计划参与者的果蔬购买财政激励计划扩展:一项成本效益分析。
Soc Sci Med. 2015 Dec;147:80-8. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.09.032. Epub 2015 Sep 30.
10
A cross-sectional analysis of the cost and affordability of achieving recommended intakes of non-starchy fruits and vegetables in the capital of Vanuatu.瓦努阿图首都实现推荐非淀粉类蔬菜水果摄入量的成本和可负担性的横断面分析。
BMC Public Health. 2015 Mar 28;15:301. doi: 10.1186/s12889-015-1644-2.

引用本文的文献

1
Using the Behaviour Change Wheel and Theoretical Domains Framework to identify factors related to increasing fruit and vegetable consumption in children to guide future intervention development.运用行为改变轮和理论领域框架来识别与增加儿童果蔬摄入量相关的因素,以指导未来干预措施的制定。
Public Health Nutr. 2024 Dec 5;27(1):e253. doi: 10.1017/S1368980024002362.
2
Confronting the challenge of promoting fruit and vegetable intake for obesity management: An alternative approach.应对促进水果和蔬菜摄入以管理肥胖症这一挑战:一种替代方法。
Int J Obes (Lond). 2024 Aug;48(8):1043-1044. doi: 10.1038/s41366-024-01520-8. Epub 2024 Apr 17.
3
The impact of a healthy checkout intervention on fruit and vegetable 'micro-pack' purchases in New Mexico.一项健康结账干预措施对新墨西哥州水果和蔬菜“微型包装”购买行为的影响。
Public Health Nutr. 2022 Sep 12;25(12):1-9. doi: 10.1017/S1368980022002026.
4
The cost of healthier and more sustainable food choices: Do plant-based consumers spend more on food?更健康、更具可持续性的食物选择成本:以植物为基础的消费者在食物上花费更多吗?
Agric Food Econ. 2022;10(1):18. doi: 10.1186/s40100-022-00224-9. Epub 2022 Jul 26.
5
U.S. Fruit and Vegetable Affordability on the Thrifty Food Plan Depends on Purchasing Power and Safety Net Supports.美国在节俭食品计划下水果和蔬菜的可负担性取决于购买力和安全网支持。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Feb 27;19(5):2772. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19052772.
6
The Supply of Calories, Proteins, and Fats in Low-Income Countries: A Four-Decade Retrospective Study.低收入国家的卡路里、蛋白质和脂肪供应:四十年回顾研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jul 9;18(14):7356. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18147356.

本文引用的文献

1
Is healthy eating too expensive?: How low-income parents evaluate the cost of food.健康饮食太贵了吗?:低收入家长如何评估食品成本。
Soc Sci Med. 2020 Mar;248:112823. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.112823. Epub 2020 Jan 31.
2
Yes We Can: Eating Healthy on a Limited Budget.是的,我们能做到:在预算有限的情况下保持健康饮食。
J Nutr Educ Behav. 2019 Mar;51(3):268-276. doi: 10.1016/j.jneb.2018.12.002.
3
Understanding the Process of Prioritizing Fruit and Vegetable Purchases in Families With Low Incomes: "A Peach May Not Fill You Up as Much as Hamburger".理解低收入家庭优先购买水果和蔬菜的过程:“一个桃子可能不如汉堡包让你饱”。
Health Educ Behav. 2018 Oct;45(5):817-823. doi: 10.1177/1090198117752790. Epub 2018 Jan 20.
4
Impacts of a Vegetable Cooking Skills Program Among Low-Income Parents and Children.低收入家长和儿童蔬菜烹饪技能方案的影响。
J Nutr Educ Behav. 2018 Sep;50(8):795-802. doi: 10.1016/j.jneb.2017.10.016. Epub 2017 Dec 12.
5
Impact of Cooking and Home Food Preparation Interventions Among Adults: A Systematic Review (2011-2016).成人烹饪和家庭食品准备干预措施的影响:系统评价(2011-2016 年)。
J Nutr Educ Behav. 2018 Feb;50(2):148-172.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jneb.2017.08.004. Epub 2017 Sep 25.
6
Identifying Underlying Beliefs About Fruit and Vegetable Consumption Among Low-Income Older Adults: An Elicitation Study Based on the Theory of Planned Behavior.识别低收入老年人对水果和蔬菜消费的潜在信念:一项基于计划行为理论的启发式研究。
J Nutr Educ Behav. 2017 Oct;49(9):717-723.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jneb.2017.05.343. Epub 2017 Jun 17.
7
Socioeconomic gradient in consumption of whole fruit and 100% fruit juice among US children and adults.美国儿童和成年人在全果及100%果汁消费方面的社会经济梯度。
Nutr J. 2015 Jan 5;14:3. doi: 10.1186/1475-2891-14-3.
8
Trends in dietary quality among adults in the United States, 1999 through 2010.美国成年人饮食质量趋势,1999 年至 2010 年。
JAMA Intern Med. 2014 Oct;174(10):1587-95. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2014.3422.
9
Fruit and vegetable consumption in a sample of 11-year-old children in ten European countries--the PRO GREENS cross-sectional survey.十个欧洲国家11岁儿童样本中的水果和蔬菜摄入量——PRO GREENS横断面调查
Public Health Nutr. 2014 Nov;17(11):2436-44. doi: 10.1017/S1368980014001347. Epub 2014 Jul 15.
10
Food costs, diet quality and energy balance in the United States.美国的食品成本、饮食质量与能量平衡
Physiol Behav. 2014 Jul;134:20-31. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2014.03.001. Epub 2014 Mar 11.