• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

前列腺影像报告和数据系统第 2.1 版评分在前列腺特异性抗原水平为 4 至 10ng/mL 男性中的截断值:病变位置的重要性。

Cutoff Values of Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2.1 Score in Men With Prostate-specific Antigen Level 4 to 10 ng/mL: Importance of Lesion Location.

机构信息

Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China; Institute of Urology, Peking University, Beijing, China; National Urological Cancer Center of China, Beijing, China.

Department of Radiology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China.

出版信息

Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2021 Aug;19(4):288-295. doi: 10.1016/j.clgc.2020.12.007. Epub 2021 Jan 7.

DOI:10.1016/j.clgc.2020.12.007
PMID:33632569
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) has been shown to have a good performance in predicting cancer among patients with a prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level of 4 to 10 ng/mL. However, lesion location on mpMRI has never been separately considered.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with PSA level of 4 to 10 ng/mL were prospectively enrolled and underwent transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy. Patient information was collected, and logistic regression analysis was performed to determine the predictive factors of clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa). Patients were grouped by lesion location to determine the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) v2.1 cutoff value in predicting csPCa.

RESULTS

Among 222 patients, 121 were diagnosed with PCa and 92 had csPCa. Age, prostate volume, PSA density, location (peripheral zone, csPCa only), and PI-RADS v2.1 score were correlated with PCa and csPCa, and PI-RADS v2.1 score was the best predictor. A PI-RADS v2.1 score of 4 was the best cutoff value for predicting csPCa in patients with lesions only in the transitional zone with respect to the Youden index (0.5896) and negative predictive value (93.10%) with acceptable sensitivity (81.82%) and specificity (77.14%). An adjustment of the cutoff value to 3 for lesions in the peripheral zone would increase the negative predictive value (92.00%) and decrease the false negative rate (2.90%) with an acceptable sensitivity (97.10%) and specificity (30.67%).

CONCLUSION

PI-RADS v2.1 score is an effective predictor of csPCa in patients with PSA levels of 4 to 10 ng/mL. Patients with transitional zone or peripheral zone lesions should undergo biopsy if the PI-RADS v2.1 score is ≥ 4 or ≥ 3, respectively.

摘要

简介

多参数磁共振成像(mpMRI)已被证明在预测 PSA 水平为 4 至 10ng/ml 的患者的癌症方面具有良好的性能。然而,mpMRI 上的病变位置从未单独考虑过。

患者和方法

前瞻性纳入 PSA 水平为 4 至 10ng/ml 的患者,并进行经直肠超声引导下前列腺活检。收集患者信息,并进行逻辑回归分析,以确定预测临床显著前列腺癌(csPCa)的预测因素。根据病变位置将患者分组,以确定 PI-RADS v2.1 在预测 csPCa 中的截断值。

结果

在 222 名患者中,121 名被诊断为 PCa,92 名患有 csPCa。年龄、前列腺体积、PSA 密度、位置(外周区,仅 csPCa)和 PI-RADS v2.1 评分与 PCa 和 csPCa 相关,PI-RADS v2.1 评分是最好的预测因素。PI-RADS v2.1 评分 4 是预测仅在外周区有病变的患者发生 csPCa 的最佳截断值,根据 Youden 指数(0.5896)和阴性预测值(93.10%),具有可接受的敏感性(81.82%)和特异性(77.14%)。对于外周区病变,将截断值调整为 3,可提高阴性预测值(92.00%),降低假阴性率(2.90%),同时保持可接受的敏感性(97.10%)和特异性(30.67%)。

结论

PI-RADS v2.1 评分是 PSA 水平为 4 至 10ng/ml 的患者预测 csPCa 的有效指标。如果 PI-RADS v2.1 评分分别为≥4 或≥3,外周区或过渡区病变患者应进行活检。

相似文献

1
Cutoff Values of Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2.1 Score in Men With Prostate-specific Antigen Level 4 to 10 ng/mL: Importance of Lesion Location.前列腺影像报告和数据系统第 2.1 版评分在前列腺特异性抗原水平为 4 至 10ng/mL 男性中的截断值:病变位置的重要性。
Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2021 Aug;19(4):288-295. doi: 10.1016/j.clgc.2020.12.007. Epub 2021 Jan 7.
2
How to make clinical decisions to avoid unnecessary prostate screening in biopsy-naïve men with PI-RADs v2 score ≤ 3?如何在 PI-RADS v2 评分≤3 的初次活检无前列腺癌的男性中做出临床决策以避免不必要的前列腺筛查?
Int J Clin Oncol. 2020 Jan;25(1):175-186. doi: 10.1007/s10147-019-01524-9. Epub 2019 Aug 31.
3
Association Between Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) Score for the Index Lesion and Multifocal, Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer.前列腺影像报告和数据系统(PI-RADS)评分与指数病变和多灶性、临床显著前列腺癌的相关性。
Eur Urol Oncol. 2018 May;1(1):29-36. doi: 10.1016/j.euo.2018.01.002. Epub 2018 May 15.
4
Can Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2 reduce unnecessary prostate biopsies in men with PSA levels of 4-10 ng/ml?前列腺影像报告和数据系统第 2 版能否减少 PSA 水平在 4-10ng/ml 的男性进行不必要的前列腺活检?
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2018 May;144(5):987-995. doi: 10.1007/s00432-018-2616-6. Epub 2018 Mar 5.
5
Using the prostate imaging reporting and data system version 2 (PI-RIDS v2) to detect prostate cancer can prevent unnecessary biopsies and invasive treatment.采用前列腺影像报告和数据系统第 2 版(PI-RADS v2)检测前列腺癌可以避免不必要的活检和侵袭性治疗。
Asian J Androl. 2018 Sep-Oct;20(5):459-464. doi: 10.4103/aja.aja_19_18.
6
Combination of prostate imaging reporting and data system (PI-RADS) score and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) density predicts biopsy outcome in prostate biopsy naïve patients.前列腺影像报告和数据系统(PI-RADS)评分与前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)密度相结合可预测初次接受前列腺穿刺活检患者的活检结果。
BJU Int. 2017 Feb;119(2):225-233. doi: 10.1111/bju.13465. Epub 2016 Apr 1.
7
Prospective PI-RADS v2.1 Atypical Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia Nodules With Marked Restricted Diffusion: Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer on Multiparametric MRI.前瞻性 PI-RADS v2.1 伴显著弥散受限的不典型前列腺增生结节:多参数 MRI 检测临床显著前列腺癌。
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2021 Aug;217(2):395-403. doi: 10.2214/AJR.20.24370. Epub 2020 Sep 2.
8
Can the addition of clinical information improve the accuracy of PI-RADS version 2 for the diagnosis of clinically significant prostate cancer in positive MRI?临床信息的加入能否提高 PI-RADS 版本 2 对 MRI 阳性中临床显著前列腺癌的诊断准确性?
Clin Radiol. 2020 Feb;75(2):157.e1-157.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2019.09.139. Epub 2019 Nov 2.
9
Diagnostic value of combining PI-RADS v2.1 with PSAD in clinically significant prostate cancer.PI-RADS v2.1 联合 PSAD 对临床显著前列腺癌的诊断价值。
Abdom Radiol (NY). 2022 Oct;47(10):3574-3582. doi: 10.1007/s00261-022-03592-4. Epub 2022 Jul 5.
10
Structured approach to resolving discordance between PI-RADS v2.1 score and targeted prostate biopsy results: an opportunity for quality improvement.采用结构化方法解决 PI-RADS v2.1 评分与靶向前列腺活检结果之间的差异:提高质量的机会。
Abdom Radiol (NY). 2022 Aug;47(8):2917-2927. doi: 10.1007/s00261-022-03562-w. Epub 2022 Jun 8.

引用本文的文献

1
Tailored use of PSA density according to multiparametric MRI index lesion location: results of a large, multi-institutional series.根据多参数MRI指数病变位置定制使用前列腺特异性抗原密度:一项大型多机构系列研究的结果
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2025 Jun 2. doi: 10.1038/s41391-025-00987-4.
2
Diagnostic performance of MRI in detecting prostate cancer in patients with prostate-specific antigen levels of 4-10 ng/mL: a systematic review and meta-analysis.磁共振成像(MRI)对前列腺特异性抗原水平为4 - 10 ng/mL的患者检测前列腺癌的诊断效能:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Insights Imaging. 2024 Jun 18;15(1):147. doi: 10.1186/s13244-024-01699-4.
3
The Impact of Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2.1 and Prostate-Specific Antigen Density in the Prediction of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer.
前列腺影像报告和数据系统2.1版及前列腺特异性抗原密度在预测临床显著性前列腺癌中的作用
Urol Res Pract. 2023 Mar;49(2):120-124. doi: 10.5152/tud.2023.220199.
4
A Sensitive Fluorescent Immunoassay for Prostate Specific Antigen Detection Based on Signal Amplify Strategy of Horseradish Peroxidase and Silicon Dioxide Nanospheres.基于辣根过氧化物酶和二氧化硅纳米球信号放大策略的前列腺特异性抗原检测灵敏荧光免疫分析方法
J Anal Methods Chem. 2022 Jul 20;2022:6209731. doi: 10.1155/2022/6209731. eCollection 2022.
5
The potential of a nomogram combined PI-RADS v2.1 and contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) to reduce unnecessary biopsies in prostate cancer diagnostics.列线图联合 PI-RADS v2.1 评分与超声造影在前列腺癌诊断中减少不必要活检的潜力。
Br J Radiol. 2022 Sep 1;95(1138):20220209. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20220209. Epub 2022 Aug 17.