Suppr超能文献

注视眼优势与黄斑光刺激试验时间和黄斑中层厚度的关系。

Relationship of Sighting Ocular Dominance with Macular Photostress Test Time and Thickness of the Middle Macular Layers.

机构信息

Eye Clinic, Zile State Hospital, Tokat, Turkey.

Eye Clinic, Denizli State Hospital, Denizli, Turkey.

出版信息

Optom Vis Sci. 2021 Mar 1;98(3):285-288. doi: 10.1097/OPX.0000000000001654.

Abstract

SIGNIFICANCE

The mechanisms of sighting ocular dominance, which is particularly important in monovision therapies and sports vision, are not fully understood yet. Whether the macula affects ocular dominance or ocular dominance affects the macula is also a subject of interest.

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship of sighting ocular dominance with macular photostress test time and middle macular layer thickness.

METHODS

One-hundred eyes of 50 healthy adult volunteers were included in this cross-sectional study. Sighting eye dominance was decided by a hole-in-the-card test. The macular photostress test was performed by exposing the eye to the ophthalmoscope light for 10 seconds and measuring the time taken to return to visual acuity within one row of pre-light exposure acuity. The spectral-domain optical coherence tomography examinations were performed to measure thickness of middle macular layers (i.e., outer nuclear, outer plexiform, inner nuclear, and inner plexiform). Refractive error and intraocular pressure (IOP) measurements were also recorded.

RESULTS

The comparison of dominant and nondominant eyes in the aspect of refractive error, IOP, and macular photostress test time did not show statistically significant differences (P > .05). The thicknesses of macular outer nuclear, outer plexiform, inner nuclear, and inner plexiform layers were similar in the dominant and nondominant eyes (P > .05). In addition, macular photostress time was not statistically significantly correlated with the thickness of middle macular layers (P > .05).

CONCLUSIONS

The thickness of middle macular layers and macular photostress recovery time are similar in dominant and nondominant eyes.

摘要

意义

尽管单视疗法和运动视力中特别重要的是确定注视眼优势的机制尚未完全了解,但黄斑是否会影响注视眼优势,或者注视眼优势是否会影响黄斑,这也是一个研究热点。

目的

本研究旨在探讨注视眼优势与黄斑光应激试验时间和黄斑中层厚度的关系。

方法

本横断面研究纳入了 50 名健康成年志愿者的 100 只眼。通过孔卡测试确定注视眼优势。黄斑光应激试验通过将眼睛暴露在检眼镜光下 10 秒,并测量恢复到光暴露前一行视力的时间来进行。使用频域光相干断层扫描检查来测量黄斑中层(即外核层、外丛状层、内核层和内丛状层)的厚度。还记录了屈光不正和眼内压(IOP)测量值。

结果

在屈光不正、IOP 和黄斑光应激试验时间方面,优势眼和非优势眼之间的比较没有统计学上的显著差异(P>0.05)。黄斑外核层、外丛状层、内核层和内丛状层的厚度在优势眼和非优势眼之间相似(P>0.05)。此外,黄斑光应激时间与黄斑中层厚度之间无统计学显著相关性(P>0.05)。

结论

优势眼和非优势眼的黄斑中层厚度和黄斑光应激恢复时间相似。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验