Senkov O N, Miracle D B
Air Force Research Laboratory, Materials and Manufacturing Directorate, Wright-Patterson AFB, USA.
Sci Rep. 2021 Feb 25;11(1):4531. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-83953-z.
Two classical criteria, by Pugh and Pettifor, have been widely used by metallurgists to predict whether a material will be brittle or ductile. A phenomenological correlation by Pugh between metal brittleness and its shear modulus to bulk modulus ratio was established more than 60 years ago. Nearly four decades later Pettifor conducted a quantum mechanical analysis of bond hybridization in a series of intermetallics and derived a separate ductility criterion based on the difference between two single-crystal elastic constants, C-C. In this paper, we discover the link between these two criteria and show that they are identical for materials with cubic crystal structures.
冶金学家广泛使用由普格(Pugh)和佩蒂弗(Pettifor)提出的两个经典标准来预测材料是脆性还是韧性的。60多年前,普格建立了金属脆性与其剪切模量与体积模量之比之间的唯象相关性。近四十年后,佩蒂弗对一系列金属间化合物中的键杂化进行了量子力学分析,并基于两个单晶弹性常数C - C之间的差异得出了一个单独的延展性标准。在本文中,我们发现了这两个标准之间的联系,并表明对于具有立方晶体结构的材料,它们是相同的。