• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

超声引导锁骨下入路臂丛神经阻滞中 0.375%罗哌卡因与 0.25%左旋布比卡因起效时间的比较:一项随机对照试验。

Comparison of the onset time between 0.375% ropivacaine and 0.25% levobupivacaine for ultrasound-guided infraclavicular brachial plexus block: a randomized-controlled trial.

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan, 88, Olympic-ro 43-gil, Songpa-gu, Seoul, 05505, Korea.

Department of Anesthesia and Pain Medicine, College of Medicine, International St. Mary's Hospital, Catholic Kwandong University, Incheon, 22711, Korea.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2021 Feb 25;11(1):4703. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-84172-2.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-021-84172-2
PMID:33633231
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7907375/
Abstract

At centers with pressure on rapid operating room turnover, onset time is one of the important considerations for choosing a local anesthetic drug. To hasten the onset of the block, higher concentrations of local anesthetics are sometimes used. However, the use of diluted local anesthetics may be safer. Therefore, we aimed to compare the onset times of equipotential levobupivacaine and ropivacaine at low concentrations for infraclavicular brachial plexus block. Adult patients undergoing upper extremity surgery under ultrasound-guided infraclavicular brachial plexus block at our center were randomly allocated to the levobupivacaine and ropivacaine groups. Infraclavicular brachial plexus block was induced with 0.25% levobupivacaine or 0.375% ropivacaine depending on the assigned group. The degrees of sensory and motor blockade were assessed for 40 min after the administration of local anesthetics. A total of 46 patients were included in the analysis. Infraclavicular brachial plexus block with 0.25% levobupivacaine and 0.375% ropivacaine provided sufficient surgical anesthesia. The sensory onset time of 0.375% ropivacaine was shorter than that of 0.25% levobupivacaine (group R, 15 [15.0-22.5] min; group L, 30 [17.5-35.0] min, p = 0.001). There were no significant differences in other block characteristics and clinical outcomes between the two groups. Thus, when a quicker block onset is required, 0.375% ropivacaine is a better choice than 0.25% levobupivacaine.Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03679897).

摘要

在手术间周转率压力较大的中心,起效时间是选择局部麻醉药物的重要考虑因素之一。为了加速阻滞的起效,有时会使用更高浓度的局部麻醉剂。然而,使用稀释的局部麻醉剂可能更安全。因此,我们旨在比较低浓度等比重左旋布比卡因和罗哌卡因用于锁骨下臂丛神经阻滞的起效时间。在我们中心接受超声引导下锁骨下臂丛神经阻滞的上肢手术的成年患者,按照随机数字表法分配至左旋布比卡因组和罗哌卡因组。根据分组,锁骨下臂丛神经阻滞采用 0.25%左旋布比卡因或 0.375%罗哌卡因诱导。在局部麻醉剂给药后 40 分钟评估感觉和运动阻滞程度。共有 46 例患者纳入分析。0.25%左旋布比卡因和 0.375%罗哌卡因行锁骨下臂丛神经阻滞可提供充分的手术麻醉。0.375%罗哌卡因的感觉起效时间短于 0.25%左旋布比卡因(组 R:15[15.0-22.5]min;组 L:30[17.5-35.0]min,p=0.001)。两组在其他阻滞特征和临床结局方面无显著差异。因此,当需要更快的阻滞起效时,0.375%罗哌卡因是比 0.25%左旋布比卡因更好的选择。

试验注册

ClinicalTrials.gov(NCT03679897)。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1ad3/7907375/1aa8e2e00266/41598_2021_84172_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1ad3/7907375/20b782d7f262/41598_2021_84172_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1ad3/7907375/1aa8e2e00266/41598_2021_84172_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1ad3/7907375/20b782d7f262/41598_2021_84172_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1ad3/7907375/1aa8e2e00266/41598_2021_84172_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparison of the onset time between 0.375% ropivacaine and 0.25% levobupivacaine for ultrasound-guided infraclavicular brachial plexus block: a randomized-controlled trial.超声引导锁骨下入路臂丛神经阻滞中 0.375%罗哌卡因与 0.25%左旋布比卡因起效时间的比较:一项随机对照试验。
Sci Rep. 2021 Feb 25;11(1):4703. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-84172-2.
2
Postoperative analgesia comparing levobupivacaine and ropivacaine for brachial plexus block: A randomized prospective trial.左旋布比卡因与罗哌卡因用于臂丛神经阻滞的术后镇痛比较:一项随机前瞻性试验。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2017 Mar;96(12):e6457. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000006457.
3
A randomized comparison between costoclavicular and paracoracoid ultrasound-guided infraclavicular block for upper limb surgery.锁骨下与肋锁突下入路超声引导锁骨下臂丛阻滞用于上肢手术的随机对照比较。
Can J Anaesth. 2017 Jun;64(6):617-625. doi: 10.1007/s12630-017-0842-z. Epub 2017 Feb 15.
4
Infraclavicular and supraclavicular approaches to brachial plexus for ambulatory elbow surgery: A randomized controlled observer-blinded trial.腋路和锁骨上路用于门诊肘部手术的臂丛神经:一项随机对照观察者盲法试验。
J Clin Anesth. 2018 Aug;48:67-72. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2018.05.005. Epub 2018 May 26.
5
Hemidiaphragmatic paralysis following ultrasound-guided supraclavicular versus infraclavicular brachial plexus blockade: a randomized clinical trial.超声引导锁骨上与锁骨下入路臂丛神经阻滞后面横膈神经麻痹:一项随机临床试验。
Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2015 Mar-Apr;40(2):133-8. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000215.
6
Retroclavicular vs Infraclavicular block for brachial plexus anesthesia: a multi-centric randomized trial.锁骨下入路与锁骨下入路臂丛神经阻滞的比较:一项多中心随机试验。
BMC Anesthesiol. 2019 Oct 27;19(1):193. doi: 10.1186/s12871-019-0868-6.
7
Retroclavicular vs supraclavicular brachial plexus block for distal upper limb surgery: a randomised, controlled, single-blinded trial.锁骨下入路与锁骨上入路臂丛神经阻滞用于上肢远端手术:一项随机、对照、单盲试验。
Br J Anaesth. 2019 Apr;122(4):518-524. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2018.12.022. Epub 2019 Jan 31.
8
A randomized comparison between ultrasound-guided costoclavicular and infraclavicular block for upper extremity surgery.超声引导锁骨下与锁骨旁阻滞用于上肢手术的随机比较。
Turk J Med Sci. 2021 Aug 30;51(4):1883-1888. doi: 10.3906/sag-2011-126.
9
Interscalene brachial plexus anesthesia and analgesia for open shoulder surgery: a randomized, double-blinded comparison between levobupivacaine and ropivacaine.肌间沟臂丛神经麻醉和镇痛用于开放性肩部手术:左旋布比卡因和罗哌卡因的随机双盲比较
Anesth Analg. 2003 Jan;96(1):253-9, table of contents. doi: 10.1097/00000539-200301000-00051.
10
Does local anesthetic temperature affect the onset and duration of ultrasound-guided infraclavicular brachial plexus nerve block?: a randomized clinical trial.局部麻醉剂温度是否会影响超声引导锁骨下臂丛神经阻滞的起效时间和持续时间?一项随机临床试验。
Braz J Anesthesiol. 2021 Jul-Aug;71(4):376-380. doi: 10.1016/j.bjane.2021.02.044. Epub 2021 Apr 3.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of the recovery profiles of propofol, dexmedetomidine, and remimazolam for intraoperative sedation in patients undergoing upper limb surgery under brachial plexus blockade: a randomized controlled trial.臂丛神经阻滞下上肢手术患者术中使用丙泊酚、右美托咪定和瑞马唑仑镇静的恢复情况比较:一项随机对照试验
Can J Anaesth. 2025 Jun 13. doi: 10.1007/s12630-025-02987-3.
2
Levobupivacaine versus ropivacaine for brachial plexus block: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.左旋布比卡因与罗哌卡因用于臂丛神经阻滞:随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析
Indian J Anaesth. 2025 Feb;69(2):179-190. doi: 10.4103/ija.ija_1156_24. Epub 2025 Jan 29.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Retroclavicular vs Infraclavicular block for brachial plexus anesthesia: a multi-centric randomized trial.锁骨下入路与锁骨下入路臂丛神经阻滞的比较:一项多中心随机试验。
BMC Anesthesiol. 2019 Oct 27;19(1):193. doi: 10.1186/s12871-019-0868-6.
2
Comparative evaluation of two approaches of infraclavicular brachial plexus block for upper-limb surgeries.两种锁骨下臂丛神经阻滞方法用于上肢手术的比较评估
Saudi J Anaesth. 2019 Jan-Mar;13(1):35-39. doi: 10.4103/sja.SJA_737_17.
3
Efficacy of axillary versus infraclavicular brachial plexus block in preventing tourniquet pain: A randomised trial.
Comparison of the Analgesic Efficacy between Levobupivacaine 0.25% and Ropivacaine 0.375% for PENG (Pericapsular Nerve Group) Block in the Context of Hip Fracture Surgery of Elderly Patients: A Single-Center, Randomized, and Controlled Clinical Trial.
0.25%左布比卡因与0.375%罗哌卡因用于老年患者髋部骨折手术中PENG(关节囊周围神经组)阻滞的镇痛效果比较:一项单中心、随机对照临床试验
J Clin Med. 2024 Jan 29;13(3):770. doi: 10.3390/jcm13030770.
4
Quadratus Lumborum Block for Ovarian Cystectomy Surgery in a Patient With Severe Kyphoscoliosis.严重脊柱后凸侧弯患者卵巢囊肿切除术的腰方肌阻滞
Cureus. 2024 Jan 2;16(1):e51513. doi: 10.7759/cureus.51513. eCollection 2024 Jan.
5
Letter to the Editor: "Endovascular revascularization of critical limb ischemia: the role of ultrasound-guided popliteal sciatic nerve block for the procedural pain management".致编辑的信:“下肢严重缺血的血管内血运重建:超声引导下腘部坐骨神经阻滞在术中疼痛管理中的作用”
Eur Radiol. 2024 Jan;34(1):294-296. doi: 10.1007/s00330-023-10444-2. Epub 2023 Nov 11.
6
Peripheral nerve block with ropivacaine in Brugada syndrome patient: Anesthetic consideration.布加综合征患者使用罗哌卡因进行外周神经阻滞:麻醉相关考量
Saudi J Anaesth. 2023 Jan-Mar;17(1):91-93. doi: 10.4103/sja.sja_573_22. Epub 2023 Jan 2.
7
Ropivacaine suppresses tumor biological characteristics of human hepatocellular carcinoma via inhibiting IGF-1R/PI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling axis.罗哌卡因通过抑制 IGF-1R/PI3K/AKT/mTOR 信号轴抑制人肝癌细胞的肿瘤生物学特性。
Bioengineered. 2021 Dec;12(2):9162-9173. doi: 10.1080/21655979.2021.1995103.
腋路与锁骨下入路臂丛神经阻滞预防止血带疼痛的效果:一项随机试验。
Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2019 Jan;36(1):48-54. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000000928.
4
Ultrasound-Guided Infraclavicular Brachial Plexus Block: Prospective Randomized Comparison of the Lateral Sagittal and Costoclavicular Approach.超声引导锁骨下臂丛神经阻滞:外侧矢状和肋锁入路的前瞻性随机比较。
Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2018 Nov;43(8):825-831. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000822.
5
A randomised comparative evaluation of supraclavicular and infraclavicular approaches to brachial plexus block for upper limb surgeries using both ultrasound and nerve stimulator.使用超声和神经刺激器对锁骨上和锁骨下臂丛神经阻滞用于上肢手术的随机对照评估。
Indian J Anaesth. 2017 Jul;61(7):581-586. doi: 10.4103/ija.IJA_402_16.
6
Comparison of the coracoid and retroclavicular approaches for ultrasound-guided infraclavicular brachial plexus block.超声引导下锁骨下臂丛神经阻滞喙突入路与锁骨后入路的比较
J Anesth. 2017 Aug;31(4):572-578. doi: 10.1007/s00540-017-2359-6. Epub 2017 Apr 18.
7
Ropivacaine versus levobupivacaine in peripheral nerve block: A PRISMA-compliant meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.罗哌卡因与左旋布比卡因用于外周神经阻滞:一项符合PRISMA标准的随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2017 Apr;96(14):e6551. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000006551.
8
Low-Volume Brachial Plexus Block Providing Surgical Anesthesia for Distal Arm Surgery Comparing Supraclavicular, Infraclavicular, and Axillary Approach: A Randomized Observer Blind Trial.低容量臂丛神经阻滞为上肢远端手术提供外科麻醉:锁骨上、锁骨下及腋窝入路的比较:一项随机观察者盲法试验
Biomed Res Int. 2016;2016:7094121. doi: 10.1155/2016/7094121. Epub 2016 Nov 21.
9
Do the Concentration and Volume of Local Anesthetics Affect the Onset and Success of Infraclavicular Anesthesia?局部麻醉药的浓度和容量会影响锁骨下麻醉的起效和成功率吗?
Anesth Pain Med. 2015 Aug 22;5(4):e23963. doi: 10.5812/aapm.23963v2. eCollection 2015 Aug.
10
Comparison of ultrasound-guided supraclavicular, infraclavicular and below-C6 interscalene brachial plexus block for upper limb surgery: a randomised, observer-blinded study.超声引导下锁骨上、锁骨下及 C6 以下肌间沟臂丛神经阻滞用于上肢手术的比较:一项随机、观察者盲法研究。
Anaesth Intensive Care. 2015 Jul;43(4):468-72. doi: 10.1177/0310057X1504300408.