Guo Xudong, Wang Hanbo, Xiang Yuzhu, Jin Xunbo, Jiang Shaobo
Department of Urology, Shandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University, Jinan, Shandong, China.
Department of Urology, Shandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University, No. 9677, East Jingshi Road, Jinan, 250014, P.R. China.
Ther Adv Urol. 2021 Jan 21;13:1756287220984046. doi: 10.1177/1756287220984046. eCollection 2021 Jan-Dec.
Management of inflammatory renal disease (IRD) can still be technically challenging for laparoscopic procedures. The aim of the present study was to compare the safety and feasibility of laparoscopic and hand-assisted laparoscopic nephrectomy in patients with IRD.
We retrospectively analyzed the data of 107 patients who underwent laparoscopic nephrectomy (LN) and hand-assisted laparoscopic nephrectomy (HALN) for IRD from January 2008 to March 2020, including pyonephrosis, renal tuberculosis, hydronephrosis, and xanthogranulomatous pyelonephritis. Patient demographics, operative outcomes, and postoperative recovery and complications were compared between the LN and HALN groups. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was conducted to identify the independent predictors of adverse outcomes.
Fifty-five subjects in the LN group and 52 subjects in the HALN group were enrolled in this study. In the LN group, laparoscopic nephrectomy was successfully performed in 50 patients (90.9%), while four (7.3%) patients were converted to HALN and one (1.8%) case was converted to open procedure. In HALN group, operations were completed in 51 (98.1%) patients and conversion to open surgery was necessary in one patient (1.9%). The LN group had a shorter median incision length (5 cm 7 cm, < 0.01) but a longer median operative duration (140 min 105 min, < 0.01) than the HALN group. There was no significant difference in blood loss, intraoperative complication rate, postoperative complication rate, recovery of bowel function, and hospital stay between the two groups. Multivariable logistic regression revealed that severe perinephric adhesions was an independent predictor of adverse outcomes.
Both LN and HALN appear to be safe and feasible for IRD. As a still minimally invasive approach, HALN provided an alternative to IRD or when conversion was needed in LN.
对于腹腔镜手术而言,炎症性肾病(IRD)的管理在技术上仍然具有挑战性。本研究的目的是比较腹腔镜肾切除术和手辅助腹腔镜肾切除术在IRD患者中的安全性和可行性。
我们回顾性分析了2008年1月至2020年3月期间因IRD接受腹腔镜肾切除术(LN)和手辅助腹腔镜肾切除术(HALN)的107例患者的数据,包括脓性肾盂炎、肾结核、肾盂积水和黄色肉芽肿性肾盂肾炎。比较了LN组和HALN组患者的人口统计学特征、手术结果、术后恢复情况及并发症。进行多变量逻辑回归分析以确定不良结局的独立预测因素。
本研究纳入了LN组的55例患者和HALN组的52例患者。在LN组中,50例患者(90.9%)成功进行了腹腔镜肾切除术,4例患者(7.3%)转为HALN,1例患者(1.8%)转为开放手术。在HALN组中,51例患者(98.1%)完成了手术,1例患者(1.9%)需要转为开放手术。与HALN组相比,LN组的中位切口长度较短(5 cm vs 7 cm,P<0.01),但中位手术时间较长(140 min vs 105 min,P<0.01)。两组在失血量、术中并发症发生率、术后并发症发生率、肠功能恢复及住院时间方面无显著差异。多变量逻辑回归显示,严重的肾周粘连是不良结局的独立预测因素。
LN和HALN对于IRD似乎都是安全可行的。作为一种仍然微创的方法,HALN为IRD或LN需要中转时提供了一种替代方案。