• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

手术方式对高危组织学类型子宫内膜样癌的结局及预后的影响。

The effect of surgical approach on the outcomes and prognosis of high-risk histologic endometrioid carcinomas.

作者信息

Han Zhihong, Zheng Zhong, Tao Kai, Yu Yanping, Wu Jinping, Tian Xiaofei

机构信息

Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Shaanxi Provincial Tumor Hospital, Xi'an, China.

Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.

出版信息

Gland Surg. 2021 Jan;10(1):355-363. doi: 10.21037/gs-20-887.

DOI:10.21037/gs-20-887
PMID:33633992
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7882312/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

High-risk histologic endometrioid carcinomas include poorly differentiated endometrial carcinoma (PDEC), uterine clear cell carcinoma (UCCC), uterine carcinosarcoma (UCS), and uterine papillary serous carcinomas (UPCS). The purpose of this study was to investigate and compare the effect of open surgery and minimally invasive surgery on the prognosis of patients with high-risk endometrial cancer tissue types.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was conducted to investigate 57 UCS or UPCS, 53 UCCC, and 110 PDEC patients receiving initial treatment at the Department of Gynecology in Shaanxi Provincial Tumor hospital and the Affiliated Hospital of Medical College of Xi'an Jiaotong University between February 2010 and January 2015. Prognostic factors were determined using univariate/multivariate analysis, and survival rates were assessed using the Kaplan-Meier method. The Cox regression model was adopted to assess the independent prognostic factors.

RESULTS

Two hundred and twenty patients who met the criteria were included in this study. At the end of follow-up period, 94 patients were still alive. Univariate analysis found that the survival time of the patients was related to staging, adjuvant therapy, and surgical approach. Multivariate analysis revealed that surgical approach, staging, pathology, and adjuvant therapy were independent prognostic factors.

CONCLUSIONS

Minimally invasive surgery has a shorter survival time compared to open surgery in women with PDEC, UCCC, UCS, and UPCS. Multivariate analysis confirmed that staging, pathological type, surgical approach, and postoperative adjuvant therapy are independent risk factors for prognosis and affect the survival of women with PDEC, UCCC, UCS, and UPCS.

摘要

背景

高危组织学类型的子宫内膜样癌包括低分化子宫内膜癌(PDEC)、子宫透明细胞癌(UCCC)、子宫癌肉瘤(UCS)和子宫浆液性乳头状癌(UPCS)。本研究的目的是调查和比较开放手术与微创手术对高危子宫内膜癌组织类型患者预后的影响。

方法

对2010年2月至2015年1月期间在陕西省肿瘤医院妇科和西安交通大学医学院附属医院接受初始治疗的57例UCS或UPCS、53例UCCC和110例PDEC患者进行回顾性分析。采用单因素/多因素分析确定预后因素,采用Kaplan-Meier法评估生存率。采用Cox回归模型评估独立预后因素。

结果

本研究纳入了220例符合标准的患者。随访期末,94例患者仍存活。单因素分析发现患者的生存时间与分期、辅助治疗和手术方式有关。多因素分析显示手术方式、分期、病理和辅助治疗是独立的预后因素。

结论

对于PDEC、UCCC、UCS和UPCS患者,微创手术的生存时间比开放手术短。多因素分析证实分期、病理类型、手术方式和术后辅助治疗是预后的独立危险因素,并影响PDEC、UCCC、UCS和UPCS患者的生存。

相似文献

1
The effect of surgical approach on the outcomes and prognosis of high-risk histologic endometrioid carcinomas.手术方式对高危组织学类型子宫内膜样癌的结局及预后的影响。
Gland Surg. 2021 Jan;10(1):355-363. doi: 10.21037/gs-20-887.
2
Clinicopathological characteristics, treatment and outcomes in uterine carcinosarcoma and grade 3 endometrial cancer patients: a comparative study.子宫癌肉瘤与3级子宫内膜癌患者的临床病理特征、治疗及预后:一项对比研究
J Gynecol Oncol. 2016 Mar;27(2):e18. doi: 10.3802/jgo.2016.27.e18. Epub 2015 Oct 12.
3
Optimal cytoreduction, depth of myometrial invasion, and age are independent prognostic factors for survival in women with uterine papillary serous and clear cell carcinomas.在患有子宫乳头状浆液性和透明细胞癌的女性中,最佳减瘤术、肌层浸润深度和年龄是独立的生存预后因素。
Int J Surg. 2016 Aug;32:71-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2016.06.041. Epub 2016 Jun 27.
4
Uterine papillary serous, clear cell, and poorly differentiated endometrioid carcinomas: a comparative study.子宫乳头状浆液性、透明细胞和低分化子宫内膜样癌:一项比较研究。
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2011 May;21(4):661-7. doi: 10.1097/IGC.0b013e3182150c89.
5
[Clinicopathological and survival analysis of 34 cases of uterine clear cell carcinoma].34例子宫透明细胞癌的临床病理及生存分析
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi. 2021 Mar 23;43(3):345-350. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112152-20200611-00550.
6
Adjuvant vaginal interventional radiotherapy in early-stage non-endometrioid carcinoma of corpus uteri: a systematic review.早期子宫体非子宫内膜样癌的辅助性阴道介入放疗:一项系统综述
J Contemp Brachytherapy. 2021 Apr;13(2):231-243. doi: 10.5114/jcb.2021.105292. Epub 2021 Apr 14.
7
Clinicopathologic characteristics and prognosis comparison of the uterine high grade endometrial carcinomas.子宫高级别子宫内膜癌的临床病理特征和预后比较。
Ginekol Pol. 2021;92(4):278-283. doi: 10.5603/GP.2020.0184. Epub 2021 Mar 10.
8
Comparative Survival Outcomes of Uterine Papillary Serous Carcinoma, Clear Cell Carcinoma, Grade 3 Endometrioid Adenocarcinoma, and Carcinosarcoma of Endometrial Cancer in Rajavithi Hospital.拉贾维提医院子宫内膜癌中子宫浆液性乳头状癌、透明细胞癌、3级子宫内膜样腺癌和癌肉瘤的生存结局比较
J Med Assoc Thai. 2016 Feb;99 Suppl 2:S75-83.
9
Adjuvant therapy of uterine clear cell carcinoma: a review.子宫透明细胞癌的辅助治疗:综述
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2016 Mar;293(3):485-92. doi: 10.1007/s00404-015-3973-x. Epub 2015 Dec 1.
10
Uterine carcinosarcoma and high-risk endometrial carcinomas: a clinicopathological comparison.子宫癌肉瘤与高危子宫内膜癌:临床病理比较
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2015 May;25(4):629-36. doi: 10.1097/IGC.0000000000000350.

本文引用的文献

1
Sentinel lymph node mapping in high-risk endometrial cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.高危子宫内膜癌前哨淋巴结映射:一项系统评价与荟萃分析。
Gland Surg. 2020 Dec;9(6):2091-2105. doi: 10.21037/gs-20-807.
2
Unique Molecular Features in High-Risk Histology Endometrial Cancers.高危组织学类型子宫内膜癌的独特分子特征
Cancers (Basel). 2019 Oct 27;11(11):1665. doi: 10.3390/cancers11111665.
3
Oncologic Outcome of Patients with (Low-Risk) Endometrial Carcinoma Undergoing Laparotomy versus Minimally Invasive Hysterectomy: A Retrospective Analysis.(低危型)子宫内膜癌患者行剖腹手术与微创手术子宫切除术的肿瘤学结局:一项回顾性分析。
Oncol Res Treat. 2019;42(12):636-649. doi: 10.1159/000502757. Epub 2019 Sep 19.
4
Nationwide Introduction of Minimally Invasive Robotic Surgery for Early-Stage Endometrial Cancer and Its Association With Severe Complications.全国范围内推广早期子宫内膜癌的微创机器人手术及其与严重并发症的关联。
JAMA Surg. 2019 Jun 1;154(6):530-538. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2018.5840.
5
Laparoscopic versus Laparotomy: Staging Surgery for Endometrial Cancer - Malaysia's Early Experience.腹腔镜手术与开腹手术:子宫内膜癌的分期手术——马来西亚的早期经验
Gynecol Minim Invasive Ther. 2019 Jan-Mar;8(1):25-29. doi: 10.4103/GMIT.GMIT_25_18. Epub 2019 Jan 23.
6
Cancer statistics, 2019.癌症统计数据,2019 年。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2019 Jan;69(1):7-34. doi: 10.3322/caac.21551. Epub 2019 Jan 8.
7
Adjuvant chemoradiotherapy versus radiotherapy alone for women with high-risk endometrial cancer (PORTEC-3): final results of an international, open-label, multicentre, randomised, phase 3 trial.高危型子宫内膜癌患者辅助放化疗对比单纯放疗(PORTEC-3):一项国际性、开放标签、多中心、随机、III 期临床试验的最终结果。
Lancet Oncol. 2018 Mar;19(3):295-309. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(18)30079-2. Epub 2018 Feb 12.
8
Uterine Neoplasms, Version 1.2018, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology.《子宫肿瘤(第 1.2018 版)》,NCCN 肿瘤学临床实践指南。
J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2018 Feb;16(2):170-199. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2018.0006.
9
Effect of Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy vs Total Abdominal Hysterectomy on Disease-Free Survival Among Women With Stage I Endometrial Cancer: A Randomized Clinical Trial.腹腔镜全子宫切除术与经腹全子宫切除术治疗Ⅰ期子宫内膜癌无病生存的效果比较:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA. 2017 Mar 28;317(12):1224-1233. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.2068.
10
Minimally Invasive Staging Surgery in Women with Early-Stage Endometrial Cancer: Analysis of the National Cancer Data Base.早期子宫内膜癌女性的微创分期手术:国家癌症数据库分析
Ann Surg Oncol. 2017 Jun;24(6):1677-1687. doi: 10.1245/s10434-016-5752-8. Epub 2017 Jan 10.