Department of Psychological Sciences, Purdue University, 703 Third Street, West Lafayette, IN, 47907, USA.
Psychon Bull Rev. 2021 Jun;28(3):910-917. doi: 10.3758/s13423-021-01895-z. Epub 2021 Feb 25.
The prevalence of media multitasking - the concurrent use of multiple forms of media - has motivated research on whether and how it is related to various cognitive abilities, such as the ability to switch tasks. However, previous research on the relationship between media multitasking and task-switching performance has yielded mixed results, possibly because of small sample sizes and a confound between task and cue transitions that resulted in switch costs being impure measures of task-switching ability. The authors conducted a large-sample study in which media multitasking behavior was surveyed and task-switching performance was assessed using two cues per task, thereby allowing switch costs to be partitioned into task-switching and cue-repetition effects. The main finding was no evidence of any relationship between media multitasking scores and task-switching effects (or cue-repetition effects), either in correlational analyses or in extreme group analyses of light and heavy media multitaskers. The results are discussed in the context of previous research, with implications for studying media multitasking in relation to task-switching performance.
媒体多任务处理(同时使用多种媒体形式)的流行程度促使人们研究它是否以及如何与各种认知能力相关,例如任务切换能力。然而,之前关于媒体多任务处理和任务切换性能之间关系的研究结果存在差异,这可能是由于样本量小以及任务和提示转换之间的混淆,导致切换成本不是任务切换能力的纯度量。作者进行了一项大规模研究,在该研究中,通过使用两种提示来评估媒体多任务处理行为和任务切换性能,从而可以将切换成本分为任务切换和提示重复效应。主要发现是,无论是在相关分析还是在轻媒体多任务处理者和重媒体多任务处理者的极端群体分析中,媒体多任务处理分数与任务切换效应(或提示重复效应)之间都没有证据表明存在任何关系。在研究媒体多任务处理与任务切换性能的关系时,需要结合之前的研究来讨论这些结果。