Alzahabi Reem, Becker Mark W, Hambrick David Z
Department of Psychology, Michigan State University.
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2017 Nov;43(11):1872-1894. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000412. Epub 2017 Apr 13.
Although multitasking with media has increased dramatically in recent years (Rideout, Foehr, & Roberts, 2010), the association between media multitasking and cognitive performance is poorly understood. In addition, the literature on the relationship between media multitasking and task-switching, one measure of cognitive control, has produced mixed results (Alzahabi & Becker, 2013; Minear et al., 2013; Ophir, Nass, & Wagner, 2009). Here we use an individual differences approach to investigate the relationship between media multitasking and task-switching performance by first examining the structure of task-switching and identifying the latent factors that contribute to switch costs. Participants performed a series of 3 different task-switching paradigms, each designed to isolate the effects of a specific putative mechanism (e.g., advanced preparation) related to task-switching performance, as well as a series of surveys to measure media multitasking and intelligence. The results suggest that task-switching performance is related to 2 somewhat independent factors, namely an advanced preparation factor and passive decay factor. In addition, multitasking with media was related to a faster ability to prepare for tasks, resulting in faster task-switching performance without a cost to accuracy. Media multitasking and intelligence were both unrelated to passive decay factors. These findings are consistent with a 2-component model of task-switching (Sohn & Anderson, 2001), as well as an automatic/executive framework of cognitive control (Schneider & Shiffrin, 1977). (PsycINFO Database Record
尽管近年来边使用媒体边进行多任务处理的情况急剧增加(赖德奥特、福尔和罗伯茨,2010年),但人们对媒体多任务处理与认知表现之间的关联却知之甚少。此外,关于媒体多任务处理与任务切换(认知控制的一种衡量指标)之间关系的文献得出了不一致的结果(阿尔扎哈比和贝克尔,2013年;米尼尔等人,2013年;奥菲尔、纳斯和瓦格纳,2009年)。在此,我们采用个体差异方法来研究媒体多任务处理与任务切换表现之间的关系,首先考察任务切换的结构,并确定导致切换成本的潜在因素。参与者完成了一系列3种不同的任务切换范式,每种范式都旨在分离与任务切换表现相关的特定假定机制(如提前准备)的影响,以及一系列用于测量媒体多任务处理和智力的调查。结果表明,任务切换表现与两个 somewhat 独立的因素有关,即提前准备因素和被动衰退因素。此外,边使用媒体边进行多任务处理与更快的任务准备能力有关,从而在不影响准确性的情况下实现更快的任务切换表现。媒体多任务处理和智力均与被动衰退因素无关。这些发现与任务切换的双成分模型( Sohn 和安德森,2001年)以及认知控制的自动/执行框架(施耐德和希夫林,1977年)一致。(《心理学文摘数据库记录》 ) (注:“somewhat”此处未准确翻译,因为在给定文本中含义不明确,推测可能是拼写错误,暂保留原文形式。)