Cardioangiologisches Centrum Bethanien (CCB), Kardiologie, Medizinische Klinik III, Agaplesion Markus Krankenhaus, Akademisches Lehrkrankenhaus der Goethe-Universität Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Centro Cardiologico Monzino, IRCCS, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy.
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2021 Apr;32(4):984-993. doi: 10.1111/jce.14973. Epub 2021 Mar 8.
To evaluate the feasibility, procedural data, and lesion characteristics of the anterior line (AL) and roofline (RL) ablation by using ablation index (AI)-guided high power (50 W) among patients with recurrent atrial fibrillation (AF) or atrial tachycardia (AT) after pulmonary vein isolation (PVI).
Data from 35 consecutive patients with macro-reentrant left atrial tachycardia or substrate at the left atrium anterior wall or roof after previous PVI were collected. Ablation power was set to 50 W, targeting AI 500 for AL and 400 for RL. The first-pass conduction block (FPB) was evaluated. The AL was arbitrarily divided into three (caudal, middle, and cranial) segments to analyze the location of conduction gaps in non-FPB patients.
A total of 32 AL and 17 RL were deployed and FPB was achieved in 24 (75%) and 14 (82%) of them, respectively. In the non-FPB group, the most frequent gap location along the AL was the middle third. The final block of AL was achieved in 97%, and the block of RL was achieved in 100%. The radiofrequency (RF) ablation time was short (2.9 ± 0.8 min for AL and 46.2 ± 15.6 s for RL). For AL, the female gender was significantly more frequent in FPB than in non-FPB patients (p = .028); patients with non-FPB were associated with significantly longer RF time as compared to patients with FPB (204 ± 47 s vs. 161 ± 41 s; p = .02). No procedural complications occurred.
AI-guided high-power (50 W) ablation appears to be a feasible, effective, and fast technique for AL and RL ablation.
评估在肺静脉隔离(PVI)后复发的心房颤动(AF)或房性心动过速(AT)患者中,使用消融指数(AI)指导的高功率(50 W)进行前侧线(AL)和顶线(RL)消融的可行性、程序数据和病变特征。
收集了 35 例先前 PVI 后左心房前壁或顶部存在大折返性左房性心动过速或基质的连续患者的数据。消融功率设定为 50 W,AL 的目标 AI 为 500,RL 的目标 AI 为 400。评估首次通过传导阻滞(FPB)。将 AL 任意分为三个(尾侧、中间和头侧)节段,分析非 FPB 患者传导间隙的位置。
共部署了 32 个 AL 和 17 个 RL,分别有 24 个(75%)和 14 个(82%)实现了 FPB。在非 FPB 组中,AL 中最常见的间隙位置是中间三分之一。AL 的最终阻滞率为 97%,RL 的阻滞率为 100%。射频(RF)消融时间较短(AL 为 2.9±0.8 分钟,RL 为 46.2±15.6 秒)。对于 AL,FPB 患者中女性明显多于非 FPB 患者(p=0.028);与 FPB 患者相比,非 FPB 患者的 RF 时间明显更长(204±47 秒与 161±41 秒;p=0.02)。无手术并发症发生。
AI 指导的高功率(50 W)消融似乎是一种可行、有效且快速的 AL 和 RL 消融技术。