• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Using the County Health Rankings Framework to Create National Percentile Scores for Health Outcomes and Health Factors.利用县健康排名框架创建健康结果和健康因素的全国百分位分数。
Perm J. 2020 Dec;25:1. doi: 10.7812/TPP/20.012.
2
Comparison of US County-Level Public Health Performance Rankings With County Cluster and National Rankings: Assessment Based on Prevalence Rates of Smoking and Obesity and Motor Vehicle Crash Death Rates.美国县一级公共卫生绩效排名与县聚类和全国排名的比较:基于吸烟和肥胖患病率以及机动车事故死亡率的评估。
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Jan 4;2(1):e186816. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.6816.
3
The County Health Rankings: rationale and methods.《县健康排名:原理与方法》
Popul Health Metr. 2015 Apr 17;13:11. doi: 10.1186/s12963-015-0044-2. eCollection 2015.
4
Using empirical Bayes methods to rank counties on population health measures.运用经验贝叶斯方法对人口健康指标进行县排名。
Prev Chronic Dis. 2013 Aug 1;10:E129. doi: 10.5888/PCD10.130028.
5
A cross-sectional study on health differences between rural and non-rural U.S. counties using the County Health Rankings.一项利用县卫生排名对美国农村和非农村县之间健康差异的横断面研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2015 Oct 1;15:441. doi: 10.1186/s12913-015-1053-3.
6
County Rankings Have Limited Utility When Predicting Liver Transplant Outcomes.县级排名在预测肝移植结果方面的作用有限。
Dig Dis Sci. 2020 Jan;65(1):104-110. doi: 10.1007/s10620-019-05734-z. Epub 2019 Jul 22.
7
Investigating improvements in premature death in two rural, majority-minority counties in the south.调查美国南部两个农村地区(少数民族占多数)过早死亡情况的改善情况。
SSM Popul Health. 2020 Jun 23;11:100618. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2020.100618. eCollection 2020 Aug.
8
Mississippi County Health Rankings 2011: improving health in your community.2011年密西西比县健康排名:改善您社区的健康状况。
J Miss State Med Assoc. 2011 Oct;52(10):322-5.
9
"Top Performing" US Hospitals and the Health Status of Counties they Serve.“表现最佳”的美国医院及其服务的县的健康状况。
J Community Health. 2018 Jun;43(3):477-487. doi: 10.1007/s10900-017-0440-6.
10
Cluster Analysis Methods to Support Population Health Improvement Among US Counties.聚类分析方法支持美国各县的人口健康改善。
J Public Health Manag Pract. 2024;30(6):E319-E328. doi: 10.1097/PHH.0000000000002034. Epub 2024 Sep 20.

引用本文的文献

1
Health differences between rural and non-rural Texas counties based on 2023 County Health Rankings.基于2023年县健康排名的德克萨斯州农村和非农村县之间的健康差异。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 Jan 2;25(1):2. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-12109-2.
2
Social and environmental determinants of health among children with long-term movement impairment.长期运动功能障碍儿童健康的社会和环境决定因素
Front Rehabil Sci. 2022 Aug 11;3:831070. doi: 10.3389/fresc.2022.831070. eCollection 2022.

本文引用的文献

1
Mobilizing Action Toward Community Health (MATCH): metrics, incentives, and partnerships for population health.促进社区健康行动(MATCH):人口健康的指标、激励措施及伙伴关系
Prev Chronic Dis. 2010 Jul;7(4):A68. Epub 2010 Jun 15.
2
The development of a standardized neighborhood deprivation index.标准化邻里剥夺指数的制定。
J Urban Health. 2006 Nov;83(6):1041-62. doi: 10.1007/s11524-006-9094-x.

利用县健康排名框架创建健康结果和健康因素的全国百分位分数。

Using the County Health Rankings Framework to Create National Percentile Scores for Health Outcomes and Health Factors.

机构信息

Center for Population Health, Kaiser Permanente Care Management Institute, Oakland, CA.

Center for Wireless and Population Health Systems, University of California, San Diego, CA.

出版信息

Perm J. 2020 Dec;25:1. doi: 10.7812/TPP/20.012.

DOI:10.7812/TPP/20.012
PMID:33635759
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8803257/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

As a means of conceptualizing population health, the County Health Rankings & Roadmaps program developed a methodology to rank counties within each state on Health Outcomes and Health Factors. We built on this framework by introducing an additional application that utilized national percentile scores and population size weighting to compare counties on a national, rather than a state, level.

METHODS

We created national percentile scores for 3078 US counties and used population size weighting in our calculations so that values for counties with larger populations would be weighted more heavily than values for counties with smaller populations.

RESULTS

We demonstrated how this application can be used to 1) compare counties nationally, 2) examine clustering and variability among counties, and 3) compare the health of states and regions. To underscore its utility, we included an example application by Kaiser Permanente. As a form of method validation, the results of this application are in line with other ranking systems (eg, US News and World Report and United Health Foundation; ρ = 0.39 to 0.91, p < 0.001).

DISCUSSION

This application can be used by communities and organizations that may be interested in comparing the health of counties, service areas, and regions in which they operate. We included additional considerations and highlighted some limitations for those interested in utilizing this application.

CONCLUSION

By comparing counties nationally and utilizing population size weighting, community partners can focus on areas that may be of greatest need in moving toward a national Culture of Health.

摘要

简介

作为一种概念化人口健康的方法,县健康排名和路线图项目开发了一种方法,对每个州内的县根据健康结果和健康因素进行排名。我们在此框架的基础上引入了一个额外的应用程序,利用全国百分位数得分和人口规模加权来比较全国范围内而不是州范围内的县。

方法

我们为 3078 个美国县创建了全国百分位得分,并在计算中使用人口规模加权,以便人口较多的县的数值比人口较少的县的数值更重。

结果

我们展示了如何使用此应用程序 1)在全国范围内比较县,2)检查县之间的聚类和变异性,以及 3)比较州和地区的健康状况。为了强调其效用,我们包括了 Kaiser Permanente 的一个应用示例。作为一种方法验证的形式,此应用程序的结果与其他排名系统(例如,美国新闻与世界报道和联合健康基金会)一致(ρ=0.39 至 0.91,p<0.001)。

讨论

对此感兴趣的社区和组织可以使用此应用程序来比较其运营所在的县、服务区和地区的健康状况。我们为有兴趣使用此应用程序的人提供了其他考虑因素,并强调了一些限制。

结论

通过全国范围内的县比较和人口规模加权利用,社区合作伙伴可以关注那些在朝着全国健康文化迈进中可能最需要关注的领域。