Department of Ethology, Institute of Animal Science, Přátelství 815, 104 00, Praha 10-Uhříněves, Czech Republic; Department of Ethology and Companion Animal Science, Faculty of Agrobiology, Food and Natural Resources, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Kamýcká 129, 165 00, Praha - Suchdol, Czech Republic.
Department of Behavioral and Cognitive Biology, Faculty of Life Sciences, University of Vienna, Althanstrasse 14, UZA I, 1090, Vienna, Austria; Department of Zoology, University of South Bohemia, Branišovská 1760, 370 05, Budweiss, Czech Republic.
Behav Processes. 2021 May;186:104361. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2021.104361. Epub 2021 Feb 24.
Personality is not a uniquely human characteristic and it has been documented in a wide range of organisms, from mammals to birds, reptiles, fish, and invertebrates. However, personality is still poorly understood in Cervids. Therefore, our study aimed to fill this gap by i) investigating personality and ii) exploring its links to dominance hierarchy, assessed by behavioral observations in 11 captive and tame male red deer (Cervus elaphus). Using questionnaires to assess personality, three trained volunteers rated these animals in 15 behaviorally composed adjectives with detailed descriptions, based on their overall impression at the end of the observation period. Behavioral data from animals were collected across three different situations, namely "feeding" (i.e., high competition for a scarce resource), "normal" (i.e., no external stimuli) in a group setting, and "handling" (i.e., stressful situation due to human manipulation) in an individual setting. We estimated dominance hierarchies between the individuals based on situations of average and high competition (i.e., "normal" and "feeding") via the Clutton-Brock Index (CBI). Using Fleiss' Kappa for inter-rater reliability, only five of our 15 behavioral adjectives showed acceptable reliability. Using principal component analysis, four of these adjectives formed one personality component labelled "Confidence/Aggressiveness". We found that although "Confidence/Aggressiveness" did not correlate with CBI, ratings of two adjectives loading onto this component, namely "Confident" and "Submissive", significantly correlated with the CBI, indicating that the questionnaire ratings reflect real behavioral variation in red deer males. Our study provides the first assessment of personality in male red deer and adds to the growing literature on Cervid personality, offering the basis for future personality research in ungulates.
人格并非人类所特有的特征,它已经在从哺乳动物到鸟类、爬行动物、鱼类和无脊椎动物等广泛的生物中得到了记录。然而,在鹿类中,人格仍然知之甚少。因此,我们的研究旨在通过以下两个方面来填补这一空白:(1)研究人格;(2)探索其与通过行为观察在 11 只圈养和驯化的雄性红鹿( Cervus elaphus )中评估的支配等级制度之间的联系。使用问卷评估人格,三名受过训练的志愿者根据观察结束时的整体印象,用 15 个详细描述的行为组成形容词来对这些动物进行评分。动物的行为数据是在三种不同的情况下收集的,即“进食”(即,对稀缺资源的激烈竞争)、在群体环境中的“正常”(即,没有外部刺激)和在个体环境中的“处理”(即,由于人为操作而产生的压力情况)。我们根据平均和高竞争情况(即“正常”和“进食”),基于个体情况通过 Clutton-Brock 指数(CBI)来估计个体之间的支配等级制度。使用 Fleiss' Kappa 进行内部评估者之间的可靠性,我们的 15 个行为形容词中只有 5 个显示出可接受的可靠性。使用主成分分析,这 5 个形容词中的 4 个形成了一个名为“自信/攻击性”的人格组成部分。我们发现,尽管“自信/攻击性”与 CBI 不相关,但加载到该成分上的两个形容词的评分,即“自信”和“顺从”,与 CBI 显著相关,这表明问卷评分反映了红鹿雄性的真实行为变化。我们的研究首次对雄性红鹿的人格进行了评估,并为鹿类的人格研究增添了新的内容,为未来的有蹄类动物的人格研究提供了基础。