University of Washington, Tacoma, 1214 N. Prospect Street, Tacoma, WA 98406, USA.
Int J Drug Policy. 2021 Dec;98:103178. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2021.103178. Epub 2021 Feb 26.
The multiple disciplines and epistemic communities of the drug research broad landscape outline the context of what we collectively and officially "know" about drug use. While there is a growing body of ethnography with people who use drugs (PWUD), researchers who are themselves out as drug users-and their unofficial expertise-are largely absent. Miranda Fricker's "epistemic injustice" framework (2007) illuminates this knowledge deficit, describing an inability to conceptualize a person's experience due to historic marginalization from the very knowledge-making that defines that experience. The disclosure of lived experience in self-reflexive critique offers an authentic way to explore the complex, intersectional politics of drug use, something that is representationally and critically missing in drug studies. Locating the missing "I" in drug research may help drug studies recognize and interrogate the hegemonies of academic discourses that influence the varieties of lived experience important to drug scholarship.
药物研究领域的多个学科和知识共同体勾勒出了我们集体和官方“了解”药物使用情况的背景。虽然越来越多的人种学研究关注吸毒者（PWUD），但公开承认自己是吸毒者的研究人员及其非官方专业知识却基本缺失。米兰达·弗里克（Miranda Fricker）的“知识不公正”框架（2007）揭示了这一知识缺陷，描述了由于历史上被边缘化，以至于无法从定义该经验的知识制作中概念化一个人的经验的能力。在自我反思批判中揭示生活经历为探索药物使用的复杂、交叉政治提供了一种真实的方式，而这在药物研究中是代表性和批判性缺失的。在药物研究中找到缺失的“我”，可能有助于药物研究认识和质疑影响药物学术重要的各种生活经验的学术话语霸权。
