Suppr超能文献

美国西雅图住宅中使用基于高效空气过滤器的便携式空气净化器的能源消耗:一项监测研究

Energy consumption of using HEPA-based portable air cleaner in residences: A monitoring study in Seattle, US.

作者信息

Xiang Jianbang, Huang Ching-Hsuan, Austin Elena, Shirai Jeff, Liu Yisi, Seto Edmund

机构信息

Department of Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, United States.

出版信息

Energy Build. 2021 Apr 1;236. doi: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2021.110773. Epub 2021 Feb 1.

Abstract

Portable air cleaners (PACs), offering both auto and manual (adjustable) operation modes, are commonly used in residences. Compared with adjustable mode, auto mode's advantage of reducing indoor PM has been previously demonstrated. This study examines the energy consumption of such PACs in six residences recruited in Seattle, United States, and compares the power consumption between auto and adjustable modes. Each residence went through a one-week-long PAC filtration session under auto and adjustable modes, respectively. PAC power consumption, indoor PM, temperature, and relative humidity (RH) were measured at 10-second intervals in each residence. A linear mixed-effects regression (LMER) model was used to compare the PAC power consumption between the two modes after adjusting for indoor PM, temperature, and RH. Results show that the mean (standard deviation) PAC power consumption under adjustable and auto modes were 7.0 (3.5) and 6.8 (2.6) W, respectively. The average monthly energy consumption of continuous PAC operation was estimated to be ~5 kWh for both modes. Based on the LEMR model, PAC power consumption under auto mode was approximately 3% larger than that under adjustable mode, after adjusting for living-room PM, temperature, and RH levels. The implications for PAC operation mode selection in residential environments were discussed.

摘要

便携式空气净化器(PAC)具有自动和手动(可调节)两种运行模式,常用于家庭住宅。与可调节模式相比,自动模式在降低室内颗粒物方面的优势此前已有研究证明。本研究调查了美国西雅图六所住宅中此类PAC的能耗情况,并比较了自动模式和可调节模式下的耗电量。每所住宅分别在自动模式和可调节模式下进行了为期一周的PAC过滤测试。在每所住宅中,每隔10秒测量一次PAC的耗电量、室内颗粒物、温度和相对湿度(RH)。在对室内颗粒物、温度和相对湿度进行校正后,使用线性混合效应回归(LMER)模型比较两种模式下PAC的耗电量。结果显示,可调节模式和自动模式下PAC的平均(标准差)耗电量分别为7.0(3.5)瓦和6.8(2.6)瓦。两种模式下PAC持续运行的月平均能耗估计约为5千瓦时。基于LEMR模型,在校正客厅颗粒物、温度和相对湿度水平后,自动模式下PAC的耗电量比可调节模式下大约高3%。文中还讨论了住宅环境中PAC运行模式选择的相关问题。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2474/7904108/d1135f163b07/nihms-1671249-f0001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验