Samfira Elena Mirela, Maricuţoiu Laurenţiu P
Teacher Training Department, Banat University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine from Timisoara, Timisoara, Romania.
Department of Psychology, West University of Timisoara, Timisoara, Romania.
Front Psychol. 2021 Feb 10;12:624938. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.624938. eCollection 2021.
Perfectionism has been studied for almost 30 years. In the present study, we investigated the internal validity of The Perfectionism Inventory (PI-Hill et al., 2004) in an occupation that encourages perfectionistic tendencies in own behavior or in students' behavior. We collected data from a large sample of schoolteachers ( = 633, 81.18% female, 63.02% from urban areas, 46.66% from secondary schools, mean age = 42.11 years) recruited using a snowball sampling approach, and we analyzed the factor structure of the PI using confirmatory factor analyses. We found that the 8-factor structure of PI provided a reasonable fit root mean square error of approximation [RMSEA = 0.055, 90% CI = (0.053-0.057); SRMR = 0.071]. However, additional analyses revealed problematic divergent validity only in the case of the scales associated with self-evaluative perfectionism, not in the case of the scales associated with conscientious perfectionism. We found that teachers displayed distinguishably different forms of perfectionism only when it referred to own person, not when it referred to perfectionism imposed to others. Based on these findings, we suggested that the PI could provide a useful framework for investigating the role of conscientious-related forms of perfectionism in the development of teacher beliefs regarding their school behavior.
对完美主义的研究已近30年。在本研究中,我们在一个鼓励自身行为或学生行为中具有完美主义倾向的职业领域,调查了《完美主义量表》(PI-Hill等人,2004年)的内部效度。我们采用滚雪球抽样法从大量学校教师样本(n = 633,81.18%为女性,63.02%来自城市地区,46.66%来自中学,平均年龄 = 42.11岁)中收集数据,并使用验证性因素分析来分析该量表的因素结构。我们发现,该量表的八因素结构提供了合理的拟合度(近似均方根误差[RMSEA = 0.055,90%置信区间 = (0.053 - 0.057)];标准化残差均方根[SRMR = 0.071])。然而,进一步分析表明,仅在与自我评估完美主义相关的量表中存在有问题的区分效度问题,而在与尽责完美主义相关的量表中则不存在。我们发现,教师仅在涉及自身时表现出明显不同形式的完美主义,而在涉及强加给他人的完美主义时则不然。基于这些发现,我们认为该量表可为研究尽责相关形式的完美主义在教师关于其学校行为信念发展中的作用提供一个有用的框架。