Im Dan C S, Reddy Susheel, Hawkins Claudia, Galvin Shannon
Division of Infectious Diseases, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, United States.
Front Microbiol. 2021 Feb 11;12:576357. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.576357. eCollection 2021.
Chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is a significant public health problem. Strategies to identify more HCV infections and improve linkage to care (LTC) are needed. We compared characteristics, treatment and LTC among chronic HCV patients in different health care settings.
Newly diagnosed HCV antibody positive (anti-HCV+) patients within settings of acute care, inpatient and outpatient in one health system were studied. Proportion of LTC and treatment were analyzed only for HCV RNA positive patients. Chi-square, one-way ANOVA and logistic regression were used to compare the characteristics and outcomes in the three care settings. Patients in acute care settings were excluded from multivariate analyses due to low sample size.
About 43, 368, and 1159 anti-HCV+ individuals were identified in acute care, inpatient, and outpatient, respectively. Proportion of RNA positivity in acute, inpatient, and outpatient were 47.8, 60.3 and 29.2%, respectively ( < 0.01). After adjusting for age, insurance type, race, and gender, outpatients had higher odds of LTC and of treatment (OR 4.7 [2.9, 7.6] and 4.5 [2.8, 7.3]).
Inpatients had lower proportion of LTC and treatment compared to outpatients. Use of LTC coordinators and the provision of integrated service for specialty care may improve outcomes.
慢性丙型肝炎病毒(HCV)感染是一个重大的公共卫生问题。需要采取策略来识别更多的HCV感染病例并改善与治疗的衔接(LTC)。我们比较了不同医疗环境下慢性HCV患者的特征、治疗情况和与治疗的衔接情况。
对一个医疗系统中急性护理、住院和门诊环境下新诊断的HCV抗体阳性(抗-HCV+)患者进行研究。仅对HCV RNA阳性患者分析与治疗的衔接比例和治疗情况。采用卡方检验、单因素方差分析和逻辑回归来比较三种护理环境下的特征和结果。由于样本量小,急性护理环境下的患者被排除在多变量分析之外。
在急性护理、住院和门诊环境中分别识别出约43例、368例和1159例抗-HCV+个体。急性、住院和门诊环境下RNA阳性的比例分别为47.8%、60.3%和29.2%(<0.01)。在调整年龄、保险类型、种族和性别后,门诊患者与治疗的衔接几率和接受治疗的几率更高(比值比4.7 [2.9, 7.6]和4.5 [2.8, 7.3])。
与门诊患者相比,住院患者与治疗的衔接比例和接受治疗的比例较低。使用与治疗衔接协调员并提供专科护理综合服务可能会改善治疗结果。